OK.....so what do  "you"  think about  Iron Maiden in the entire 1990's...... (1990)No Prayer For The Dying.......(1992)"Fear Of The Dark"............(1995)"The X Factor"...........(1998)"Virtual Eleven"........???????????????????


What do you think...what is your "opinions" on the 1990's Iron Maiden albums as a whole...not just 1 song...I mean I want you to tell me if you think each album is "top notch quality" Iron Maiden...


I think "Be Quick Or Be Dead" is one of Maiden's best songs but as for the album of Fear Of The Dark? It sucks the big one...... ..one of Iron Maiden's lame albums.....  Now......your turn?

I would like to see how many fans actually think the Iron Maiden albums of the 1990's are just as equal and just as good as any other Iron Maiden albums.......this ought to be good....

		Sinner Rider wrote:
		I just took the time to read what everyone has been writing regarding this... Maiden is the one of the most talented metal bands, they never changed the sound. Never sold out and went techno or disco (yes I'm referring to kiss)..The never gave up on Eddie.. and c'mon created power metal.. (along with others) So they made a lil filler.. I know that the later stuff is lil more tame compared to the later....~ Brave new world was the acception. But what the hell was wrong with Seventh Son.. Fear of the Dark I can see.. (but hey the song fear of the dark is friggin awesome), I guess I can also see no prayer for the dyin.. but overall come on!  Motorhead is soild as hell... but they didn't necessarily create what Maiden did sound or talent wise.  I'm sorry Lemmy I love ya.. no disrespect mean't.

I just took the time to read what everyone has been writing regarding this...

Maiden is the one of the most talented metal bands, they never changed the sound. Never sold out and went techno or disco (yes I'm referring to kiss)..The never gave up on Eddie.. and c'mon created power metal.. (along with others)

So they made a lil filler.. I know that the later stuff is lil more tame compared to the later....~ Brave new world was the acception.

But what the hell was wrong with Seventh Son.. Fear of the Dark I can see.. (but hey the song fear of the dark is friggin awesome), I guess I can also see no prayer for the dyin.. but overall come on! 

Motorhead is soild as hell... but they didn't necessarily create what Maiden did sound or talent wise. 


I'm sorry Lemmy I love ya.. no disrespect mean't.

Well....again,we will have to "agree" to "disagree".   But I am curious though......I want to know what your opinion of the entire 1990's Iron Maiden albums.....4 albums in a row

Starting with 1990 "No Prayer For The Dying"............1992"Fear Of The Dark"...........1995"The X Factor"............1998"Virtual Eleven".......?

		british.steel wrote:
		Brave new world is a great album, 5 of the songs on that album are amazing,the other ones are great too. but what i meant was the 5 songs are great Maiden songs.  Dance of death and Matter of life and death both are perfect albums to me, i love their new style. and im sure their newest album that comes out 2010 will be much better than motorheads new stuff

Yeah but you said Brave New World you only liked 5 songs on...and that album is part of thier last 3 albums.....so now you are saying that you like the album from start to finish? LOL

		british.steel wrote:
		if only we could alter this thread to the whos more consistent band thing! lol but its just my opinion, i respect your opinion and you should respect mine. and as far as the consistency thing goes, each motorhead album ive heard has maybe 2-5 good songs, and maidens first 7 and last 3 are good start to finish. not a song i would skip

LOL! Whatever british steel.....lol!      This thread should of been titled " Who has been more consistant in writting consistant quality albums"?  Maiden or Motorhead?

And I'd lay money that 85 % of people would vote for Motorhead.

		british.steel wrote:
		and the Iron Maiden fans say that the first 7 albums are classic. and 7 classic lbums tears apart a "one hit wonder" band. and how come i dont hear about a movie called Motorhead:flight 666...cuz they cant sell out huge arenas like maiden does. Lemmy did better writing for Ozzy. Motorhead just doesnt cut it like maiden does

No......I can't answer who is "better".....but being a fan of both for this many years....(27 years for both bands)...I KNOW who is more "consistant in writting quality material"....and that trophy

has to go to Motorhead in my opinion.....and only judging on what Iron Maiden and Motorhead fans have told me about each band's albums throughout both the band's careers.

I've heard constant bickering about Iron Maiden's direction and styles of song writting....and how they are nowhere near as good as they once were from fans throught the years

but I never hear that from Motorhead fans all these years? Why is this? Because Motorhead stays true to thier fans and has written more quality albums for Motorhead fans

than Maiden has written for thier fans throught the years. Thats all I am saying....I'm not saying that Motorheads albums are better than the first 5 albums of Iron Maiden....

I'm just saying that to Motorhead fans...they get more albums consistantly from Motorhead than the Iron Maiden fan.

		british.steel wrote:
		J.D., we can go on for days about this no doubt about it. lol!....but there will never be a real answer to the question its all about the style of music you like and what you like, for me its Maiden, for you its Motorhead, thats fine i respect you opinion. we know who the "harder" band is, but you cant answer who is "better"

there are actually plenty of bands heavier than motorhead