| [_strat_] Monday, May 11, 2009 1:50:48 AM | |
|
Exactly. It demonstrates my mastery of English language, as well as my poetic spirit, all culminated in this one sentence. 
Actualy, I stole it from a book, but dont tell!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Head banger from Sunday, May 10, 2009 7:59:35 PM)| |  | Head banger wrote: | | well said
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Nope. Storms rage, waves crash overhead, dumbasses roar, but we just keep paddling on.
Hello to you too! Glad to see you back on.
| | | ronhartsell wrote: | | | Hi strat and Guido!!! Glad to see nothings changed with you two (lol)... |
|
|
|
|
| [Head banger] Sunday, May 10, 2009 7:59:35 PM | |
|
well said
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:09:17 PM)| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Nope. Storms rage, waves crash overhead, dumbasses roar, but we just keep paddling on.
Hello to you too! Glad to see you back on.
| | | ronhartsell wrote: | | | Hi strat and Guido!!! Glad to see nothings changed with you two (lol)... |
|
|
|
| [Necroticist] Sunday, May 10, 2009 7:54:17 PM | |
|
| I think i may take a 'time-out' = so pissed off with assholes, liars and cyber-sluts....might be a good option (ppl who matter know where to find me) |
|
| [guidogodoy] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:37:07 PM | |
|
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:24:13 PM)| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | For whom? You or the pelican?
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave! 
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [_strat_] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:24:13 PM | |
|
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:19:40 PM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | For whom? You or the pelican?
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [guidogodoy] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:20:30 PM | |
|
And a rollin' we are!
Good to see you too, Ron!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:06:17 PM)| | | ronhartsell wrote: | | | Hi strat and Guido!!! Glad to see nothings changed with you two (lol)... |
|
|
| [guidogodoy] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:19:40 PM | |
|
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:02:27 PM)| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | For whom? You or the pelican?
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [_strat_] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:09:17 PM | |
|
Nope. Storms rage, waves crash overhead, dumbasses roar, but we just keep paddling on.
Hello to you too! Glad to see you back on.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:06:17 PM)| | | ronhartsell wrote: | | | Hi strat and Guido!!! Glad to see nothings changed with you two (lol)... |
|
|
| [ron h] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:06:17 PM | |
|
| Hi strat and Guido!!! Glad to see nothings changed with you two (lol)... |
|
| [_strat_] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:02:27 PM | |
|
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:00:20 PM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | For whom? You or the pelican?
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [guidogodoy] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:00:20 PM | |
|
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:43:10 PM)| | | _strat_ wrote: | | For whom? You or the pelican?
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [ron h] Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:51:23 PM | |
|
| LOL...I'm only pissed that it took as long as it has to get back on-line!!! |
|
| [_strat_] Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:44:05 PM | |
|
Yup... Star Trek hipped up...
 |
|
| [_strat_] Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:43:10 PM | |
|
For whom? You or the pelican?
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:40:48 PM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
| [guidogodoy] Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:40:48 PM | |
|
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:19:48 PM)| | | _strat_ wrote: | | Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM |
|
|
|
|
| [_strat_] Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:19:48 PM | |
|
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Sunday, May 10, 2009 12:37:51 PM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM |
|
|
|
| [_strat_] Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:18:29 PM | |
|
Well, in defense of remakes, if they made them the same as the original, it wouldnt really have a point.
But... I usualy dont like them. The remake of the Planet of the Apes will imo stand as an eternal reminder that remaking classic movies is NOT cool. The original with Charlton Heston was awesome - the remake sucks. Because for all the bad things I could say about Heston, he was still a great actor.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:10:44 AM)| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM |
|
|
| [Deep Freeze] Sunday, May 10, 2009 12:52:24 PM | |
|
A LOT you know, DeNunzio!!! Apart from taking in the stray triceratops occasionally, our cave was pet-free..... HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHHAHAHAHAAA!!!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Sunday, May 10, 2009 12:37:51 PM)| | | guidogodoy wrote: | | I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM |
|
|
|
| [guidogodoy] Sunday, May 10, 2009 12:37:51 PM | |
|
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:10:44 AM)| | | Deep Freeze wrote: | | So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM |
|
|
| [Deep Freeze] Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:10:44 AM | |
|
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM |
|
