YES---GUIDO--I SEE --I THINK !!!!---YOU ARE THE NEW WINNER  !! 

		guidogodoy wrote:
		Ok, now I can honestly say that I both saw Saw and I see saw.  However,  I have never even seen one scene of Saw WHILE see sawing. I suppose that I could see Saw while see sawing but that remains to bee seen. I would love that the seesaw be near the sea so I could see Saw on a seesaw by the sea. What I do see is that it would be seen as cool to saw a seesaw near the sea while seeing Saw, you see?      loripip wrote: I GIVE UP --I SURRENDER ---YOU WIN --I JUST CAN'T BEAT THAT !!---  --THE WINNER --SOY  !!-- WHO HASN'T REALLY SEEN SAW TIL HE'S SEEN IT WITH ME .---YA SEE ?--DO YA WANT TO SEE SAW WITH ME ,SOY ?--THEN YOU COULD REALLY SEE SAW THE WAY I SAW SAW  WHEN I SAW SAW THE FIRST TIME --!!!    AND THEN WE CAN GO TO THE PLAYGROUND & GET ON THE SEESAW RIGHT AFTER WE SAW SAW !  OR WE CAN SEESAW BEFORE WE GO SEE SAW ---   HA !!--I STILL GOT IT !!  (DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS BUT I STILL GOT IT !!)       Soylentgreen4u wrote: I SEE YOUR LOGIC IN SEEING SCENES FROM SAW THAT I SEE IN THE SAW SERIES OF SCENES...FURTHERMORE,SEEING SCENES FROM THE SAW SERIES SEEMINGLY SEEMS TO MAKE NO SENSE...SEEING SAW AS I SAW SAW SEEMS SLIGHTLY SILLY...YOU SEE???......      loripip wrote: I'M GLAD YOU SAW SAW BUT IF YOU HAD SEEN SAW WHEN I SAW SAW  THEN WE WOULD'VE SEEN SAW AT THE SAME TIME  !!!   DO YA SEE WHAT I'M SAYING ABOUT SEEING SAW ? !!!!   I HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND BECAUSE I LOST MYSELF AT "I'M GLAD "      Soylentgreen4u wrote: RIIIIIIIGHT!!!...YES,YOU SHOULD SEE SAW...I SAW SAW & ALTHOUGH I'VE SEEN BETTER THAN SAW...SAW WAS OK CAUSE I SEEN SAW SEVERAL TIMES...SO THE MORAL OF THIS STORY IS:SEE SAW & YOU WILL SEE THAT SAW IS WORTH SEEING...GOT IT ,GOOD!...      loripip wrote: SAW MOVIES RULE !!!!--IT'S RARE TO FIND A SEQUEL THAT'S JUST AS GOOD IF NOT BETTER THAN THE ONE BEFORE !!--ENJOY !!!      guidogodoy wrote: Just starting Saw 3....I gotta say, I completely misjudged this series. It is WAY cool! I am not one for an abject gore-fest (as I had assumed) but this was far from it. Saw 1, especially. I had heard from everyone when it first came out that it was all about someone cutting off his foot. Um..yeah, it has that but they neglected to speak of the great story, camera work, flash forwards, backwards, etc. Finished Saw 2 last night and, while not QUITE as good, still drew me in with those elaborate traps. Ending, again, was one of those cool Twillight Zone twists. Off to Saw 3 I go. Already started and like the beginning. Harsh, but cool. All thanks to TV as I posted before. Had I not been flipping channels, I would have never known. Now I see why they made three after the original. Even see traces of that "trap...judge what to do for yourself" mentality in The Dark Knight. Joker does the same thing. <==if you haven't seen THAT yet...two thumbs up! GO!

SAW MOVIES RULE !!!!--IT'S RARE TO FIND A SEQUEL THAT'S JUST AS GOOD IF NOT BETTER THAN THE ONE BEFORE !!--ENJOY !!!

		guidogodoy wrote:
		Just starting Saw 3....I gotta say, I completely misjudged this series. It is WAY cool! I am not one for an abject gore-fest (as I had assumed) but this was far from it. Saw 1, especially. I had heard from everyone when it first came out that it was all about someone cutting off his foot. Um..yeah, it has that but they neglected to speak of the great story, camera work, flash forwards, backwards, etc. Finished Saw 2 last night and, while not QUITE as good, still drew me in with those elaborate traps. Ending, again, was one of those cool Twillight Zone twists. Off to Saw 3 I go. Already started and like the beginning. Harsh, but cool. All thanks to TV as I posted before. Had I not been flipping channels, I would have never known. Now I see why they made three after the original. Even see traces of that "trap...judge what to do for yourself" mentality in The Dark Knight. Joker does the same thing. <==if you haven't seen THAT yet...two thumbs up! GO!

EARLY 70's I BELIEVE ?...RODDY McDOWELL ?...QUITE CREEPY IF I RECALL...

		VICTIM OF METAL wrote:
		The Legend of Hell House? Anyone seen it?