Topics List Inbox Friends Search Admin Information  
 You are not logged in.   
Username: Password: Register

Social Issues and Politics
 This Topic was created by [THEWINNIPEGWARRIOR�] Messages per page: [20] 50 100 
Message display order: [Newest first] Oldest first 
Go to Parent Topic
 


Discussions on sensitive and sometimes controversial subjects. PLAY NICE!!!!!






You do not have enough Respect Points to post in this topic.


[Soylentgreen4u] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 12:20:22 PM 
FIRST OF ALL I WILL SAY "GOOD AFTERNOON",BECAUSE "I AM CANADIAN AND I'M ALSO 
POLITE"......

NOW THAT'S OUTTA THE WAY,WE CAN CONTINUE...YOUUUUUUU BEDWETTING TINY-BRAINED
WIPER OF OTHER PEOPLE'S BOTTOMS!......YOU START WITH:"SEE IF  I CAN DO THIS WITHOUT A TON OF BACKREADING?"...WHY NOT START WITH BABYSTEPS FIRST?...I WAS WONDERING IF YOU CAN CHEW GUM AND WALK AT THE SAME TIME,YOU MALODOUROUS
GUN-RUNNING REPUBLICAN!.......AT LEAST YOU ADMIT YOU'RE AN OLD MAN,WELL YOUR BRAIN IS SHOWING THAT ANYWAY! ...YOU CAN'T WIN...WE WILL CRUSH YOU LIKE BUG!!!...
SO YOU DON'T NEED TRADE WITH CHINA,WHO YOUR COUNTRY ROUTINELY CRITICIZES ON YOUR NETWORKS,YET YOUR ADMINISTRATION KISSES THEIR ASS IN THE NAME OF $...I NOTICE YOU LEFT OUT MY COUNTRY AS FAR AS NOT NEEDING TRADE..Hmmmm...AS WELL YOU
SHOULD:
-LAST YEAR IN THE FIRST 11 MONTHS OF TRADE WITH CANADA= $560,000,000,000
-LAST YEAR IN THE FIRST 11 MONTHS OF TRADE WITH CHINA=$379,000,000,000
....SO THE U.S. WILL BE JUST FINE WITHOUT THIS TRADE YOU SAY?...IF YOU SAY SO...

OHHH... ONE MORE THING...ARE YOU CALLING THE FRENCH WIMPS?...ANSWER THAT,I DARE YOU!........TAKE YOUR TIME,WHENEVER YOU GET BACK FROM THE STORE WITH A FRESH BATCH OF DEPENDS,FOR YOUR SOILED, LOATHSOME,SPOTTY BEHIND!...


  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Tuesday, February 03, 2009 8:37:23 AM)
[Deep Freeze] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 8:37:23 AM 

OK, let's see if I can do this without a ton of "backreading:,,,,,,

If "push came to shove" as far as China is concerned, I think we would win. Yes, I believe we could do it but it would depend on who is making the decisions. For example, if we had say a "Clinton" in office, NO. We would stand around playing grab ass until the first Chinese nuke leveled a coastal city then we would end up as strat mentioned. Now, if we had a "Reagan" at the helm (please see Lybia for example) we would stomp the rice out of that place before the first junk could leave port.

As I have said MANY times before, I am not interested in the "little guy". Capitalsim works. It is profitable. It has made me a very comfortable old man and that is that. All of this whining about the poor little countires that get taken advantage of by the big, mean US...BAH!! Too friggin bad! Quit your whining and develop "the bomb"..Israel did!! HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Oh boy! I can smell the smoke coming out of strat's ears..) HAAAHAHAHAHAAA!!!!!!

Finally, you cannnnnnnucks have land that is nothing but a place that we use to keep the cold! HA!!!!!!!! And the French ARE there and they DO push you guys around! How embarrassing must THAT be?? Some little frenchie in a beret with one of those tiny, pencil mustaches ordering you guys around ....HAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!  "Mon fi, geet mee a Pepsee avec a moooose saaanweeech!! Oh, aaan don't forgeeet zee FRENCH fries..." BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAAAAAA!!!!!!

[_strat_] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 7:29:26 AM 
Lol.... Yeah, that it could. Nuking would be more simple, but I guess your plan isnt bad either. And it could serve as an inspiration for a kickass computer game too.
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Head banger from Tuesday, February 03, 2009 7:27:27 AM)
[Head banger] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 7:27:27 AM 
true, the defender has the advantage, and definatly lets not find out.
could resolve the population issues of the world in short order.
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, February 03, 2009 7:22:36 AM)
[Head banger] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 7:26:16 AM 
thats not because of unions, its because of the free market that in the more developed countries people get more and have more rights
you see, the more jobs there are, the more companies need the workers, and skilled ones at that.  in a place with low employement, they know they can abuse people and pay them less, a union wont help, someone else will cross the line to work.  Always, the free marked decides, based on scarcity.  for the worker, they improve their situation by impriving their skills.  for a country, they improve their situation by creating more jobs and wealth.  money and work lead to freedom, not slavery towards a union or comunism.
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:11:03 AM)
[_strat_] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 7:22:36 AM 
True, but whoever would be the attacker would have to bring the army to the enemy... And with the US navy, I think the US has the upper hand here.

Also, the defender would have an advantage. IDK. Hopefuly, we wont find out.
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Head banger from Tuesday, February 03, 2009 7:16:19 AM)
[Head banger] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 7:16:19 AM 
eliminate the nukes, and forget that there are losers in every war.  forget economics also, just a straight up war.  the ants would win.  sure technology is nice, but china could field a 300 million person army if nessesary. 
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:14:51 AM)
[_strat_] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:30:03 AM 
You too. Damn time zones... I will be leaving work in two hours!
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:27:47 AM)
[ron h] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:27:47 AM 
...speaking of which, I must leave for work myself...but I'm with on that!!!...more later, have a good one!!...
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:11:03 AM)
[_strat_] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 5:11:03 AM 
Well, thats how it is. Not just in sweatshops and third world countries. Thats how labour markets work. The person that is prepared to work the longest hours, for the smallest possible wage, with minimum allowed rights... Gets the job. The only difference between us (as in the "developed world") and them (as in the "developing world") is that we have a more organised labour movement (and in our case it is the legacy of socialism), and laws that guarantee certain minimums and maximums. The employer cannot give you less than the minimal wage. He cannot force you to work longer than the law says. The principal is the same as in sweatshops, tho, only they dont have any law-enforced bottom lines. There the bottom line is bare survival.

And quite frankly... If the choice is slavery or playing on an uneven field, I choose the uneven field. And in any case, free trade as it is applied today, leads to slavery, there can be no doubt about it.
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:52:50 AM)
[ron h] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:52:50 AM 
...oh, strat...I've watched investigations into Wal Mart and how the products end up on the shelves...not only to they pit other countries against each other in bidding wars for labor, but then they pit the workers against each other to drive costs down even more...it's very sad...and it's all legal in these countries because their governments don't care how they get the work just so long as they get it...I've watched people get beat, attack each other, fired because someone walks in the door and says they can work for 5¢ less a day...it's dehumanizing...but you'll never see any of that in a Wal Mart ad...and this is just one example, I'm not even getting into 'sweat shops'...ppl providing cheap labor to work off debts in exchange for work visa's...you won't see that legally happening in our borders!!!...and those that do face harsh penalties, jail time, deportation if applicable...this is a crux to free trade...America(n) (policy) can't and won't accept that, and 'her' ppl find it a tragedy...this way of doing business is why I claim an un-even playing field (among others)!!
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:01:52 AM)
[_strat_] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:01:52 AM 
I sure can say it, and it wouldnt be the first time I did it in here. We get back to the capitalist system, and its implementation on a global level, especialy in a very unevenly developed world.

Now, what you probably mean is that Wal-Mart doesnt have anything "made in USA" on its shelves - but the companies that produce it are American. 1$ a week stuff - just like you said yourself. Much the same here. I would bet my life that the computer Im using right now was made somewhere in Southeast Asia. Screw the quality of life - the bosses dont care about it. They never worked a day themselves, never had to live with a limited amount of basic neccesities... They dont understand, and if they did they probably wouldnt give a shit anyway.   [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Tuesday, February 03, 2009 3:45:55 AM)
Edited at: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:04:52 AM
[ron h] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 3:45:55 AM 
...can anyone say 'corporate greed'??...and it is without boundaries or nationality, it's what happens in 'free' trade...the rich get richer, no matter what the cost...look at Wal Mart, owned and operated by Americans, but you'd be hard pressed to find anything American made on the shelves...a lot of it is the cheapest sh*t you'll find, but it costs nothing to put it on the shelves, and we've been dealing with this for years...why do you think companies outsource??, so they can get away with paying $1 a week in wages...wtf is that??...where's the quality of life??
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:41:13 AM)
[_strat_] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:41:13 AM 
Well, I thought it was directed at me, since I raised a voice against the US economy. In any case, if PK1990 is reading, then I will be declared an America hatin`, freedom loathin`, terrorist loathin` liberal sissy by default.

Ok, down to business. You may not care for the effects of American policies outside of the US, and you may think that it is just fine, and that you guys are helping out more than you are hurting. Bullshit. You know, markets are free, but that doesnt mean that people are too. We are pretty new to the game, admitedly. Us, the rest of former Yugoslavia, and the Warsaw pact had a very closed economy 20 years ago. But as soon as it opened, we were stormed by western companies, who came here with cheaper products (can you say outsourcing?), that were advertised wildly (and still are), and ours could not compete - hence why so many of east European companies were obliterated in the 90s. Or, whenever western companies (American or otherwise) saw competition there, they bought a company and simply closed it. That way of making money certainly is bad, wheter you care for it or not. And thats the way how the west became rich. Economic colonisation. No charity can ever outweight that. Not to mention that we buy your products, but dont recieve charity. Again, the "rest of the world" is not just some place - its many places, with different relations with you guys.

Now, plenty of morality in there... You may not care for it, but there it is. You need us way more than we need you.
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Monday, February 02, 2009 5:07:00 PM)
[_strat_] Tuesday, February 03, 2009 2:14:51 AM 
In case of US vs. China, there cant really be a winner. The US has the technology and the experience, China has numbers and an almost ant-like mentality. And both have nukes. Once China starts getting out of its borders, and acting the same way the US does (a matter of time, imo) we will have a new cold war. Pity, this time we are already choosing sides, instead of being nice and neutral like we were the last time.
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Head banger from Monday, February 02, 2009 10:29:45 PM)
[Head banger] Monday, February 02, 2009 10:29:45 PM 
my point wasnt actualy about america, it was protectionist trade policies.  I put forth that they hurt the country seeking protection just as much as those they trade with.  long term, to be successfull, you need more successfull partners.  is it better to get half a 8 inch pizza or a quarter of a 16 inch pizza.  now remember your geometry.

BTW, do you think your armed forces could take down china if push came to shove?  you could nuke eachother into oblivion, but thats lose lose.  could you win?
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Monday, February 02, 2009 10:56:09 AM)
[Soylentgreen4u] Monday, February 02, 2009 10:23:10 PM 
NO DRILLING IN THE ARCTIC! AND NO KILLING MOOSE...I'M AN ENVIRONMENTALIST AND....
"I AM CANADIAN"...STAY OUT OF MY FOREST...AND WHO TOOK MY BEER...EH?...

  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Head banger from Monday, February 02, 2009 10:15:54 PM)
[Head banger] Monday, February 02, 2009 10:15:54 PM 
oil, come on.  stop all imports and by the end of the next winter olympics your walking.  sure you have oil, in the arctic wildlife reserve, but how to get it.  forget the environmentalists, if they all blesses it, drill for it.  how will you get it home?  build a pipe to valdez?  look at a map.

build a pipe to chicago, but wait. that minor insignificant CANADA is in the way. 
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Monday, February 02, 2009 5:50:46 PM)
[Head banger] Monday, February 02, 2009 10:06:30 PM 
wait, did you sugest politicians and governments could learn?  and that they do the ocasional thing right?  realy.  I missed that day.
  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Monday, February 02, 2009 8:03:00 PM)
[Head banger] Monday, February 02, 2009 10:04:42 PM 

we are bigger, you are badder, and if you come up here and kill yourself a moose, you will find what stinks when cleaning it.  

the french would screw up a wet dream!!!
we had them and kicked their asses. 


  [Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Monday, February 02, 2009 8:52:29 PM)
<< Previous Message 681 to 700
Messages per page: [20] 50 100 
Message display order: [Newest first] Oldest first 
Page: First ...25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ... Last
Next >>