| [Drummaboy] Thursday, October 06, 2011 9:23:21 PM | |
|
| That's tough one. No Sleep 'Til Hammersmith was the first Metal vinyl album I ever bought when it first came out and that was before I bought any of Maiden's stuff. But I just seemed to get into Maiden in a much bigger way especially from Beast through to Seventh Son. HUGE Maiden follower back then. Then I lost interest until Dickinson and Smith returned. I'm only now getting back into Motorhead and rediscovering the back catalogue and the most recent run of albums are awesome. I'd have to pick Maiden over Motorhead but I love 'em both:). |
|
| [AnaCalavera] Wednesday, October 05, 2011 9:56:12 PM | |
|
I am a greater fan of Maiden than Motorhead because of the same reason of listening to them longer time than to Motorhead.
They have released great albums time after time. Musically, always awesome. Good lyrics, awesome music. |
|
| [daseeker] Tuesday, October 04, 2011 11:28:49 AM | |
|
| Wow what a topic? If there wasnt a Motorhead would there be a Maiden? But if it were not for Maiden would Metal have been as big? Damn I have to have BOTH! |
|
| [Rik_] Wednesday, July 20, 2011 9:53:08 AM | |
|
Got tickets to see Maiden this weekend. Saw them a couple of years ago when they played the whole of "matter of life and death" which was too much for me as it turned out. Looks like the set list for this year, if what I've read is accurate, is going to feature songs mainly from their last few albums including Final frontier which I lost interest in after one listen. Looks like it's going to be a lonnnnng night again!
At least if Motorhead play a couple of tracks you don't like they don't take up half the show time.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Wednesday, July 20, 2011 3:15:27 AM)| |  | J.D. DIAMOND wrote: | | I absolutely disagree. Maiden does not "rock hard" with studio albums these days.The last "rocking hard" album Iron Maiden has done was 1984's Powerslave. And thats the problem...they are too intelligent and it shows by the ridiculous progression every lame studio album has these last 26 years.
| | | kman1759 wrote: | | | I haven't listened to both bands too much but I must say Iron Maiden. They both rock pretty hard, but Lemmy's vocals got old to me after a while, his voice jsut kind of sounds like the same thing. Bruce is a great singer, I also find Maiden to be more intelligent. |
|
|
|
| [Blue Moon] Wednesday, July 20, 2011 5:48:23 AM | |
|
| I prefer Motörhead, and Iron Maiden tend to get a little too repetitive for my taste. |
|
| [J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, July 20, 2011 3:15:27 AM | |
|
I absolutely disagree. Maiden does not "rock hard" with studio albums these days.The last "rocking hard" album Iron Maiden has done was 1984's Powerslave. And thats the problem...they are too intelligent and it shows by the ridiculous progression every lame studio album has these last 26 years.
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by kman1759 from Tuesday, June 21, 2011 7:53:35 PM)| | | kman1759 wrote: | | | I haven't listened to both bands too much but I must say Iron Maiden. They both rock pretty hard, but Lemmy's vocals got old to me after a while, his voice jsut kind of sounds like the same thing. Bruce is a great singer, I also find Maiden to be more intelligent. |
|
|
| [Soylentgreen4u] Tuesday, July 19, 2011 11:38:23 PM | |
|
"WE ARE MOTORHEAD! ... AND WE'RE IN MONTREAL THIS SUNDAY FOR 'HEAVY MTL' " (TORONTO SATURDAY FOR 'HEAVY T.O.' ) 
|
|
| [kman1759] Tuesday, June 21, 2011 7:53:35 PM | |
|
| I haven't listened to both bands too much but I must say Iron Maiden. They both rock pretty hard, but Lemmy's vocals got old to me after a while, his voice jsut kind of sounds like the same thing. Bruce is a great singer, I also find Maiden to be more intelligent. |
|
| [carl.roper2011] Friday, May 13, 2011 2:54:43 PM | |
|
| Iron Maiden , been a fan of them from 1986 . I have got all their studio albums and live ones aswell |
|
| [Skybreaker] Sunday, May 08, 2011 9:54:10 PM | |
|
| Motorhead is harder but I like both. |
|
| [Rudy63] Friday, May 06, 2011 6:53:55 AM | |
|
| NOBODY CAN COMPETE WITH JUDAS PRIEST ! ! ! |
|
| [hotlegs] Tuesday, May 03, 2011 1:31:30 PM | |
|
i agree with both. but i have another goodone
for you.MOTORHEAD&MAIDEN.hotlegs. |
|
| [hellrazerjazz] Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:54:09 PM | |
|
|
| [geterdone] Monday, May 02, 2011 8:43:20 PM | |
|
why not both?, they both rock it hard,, however, maiden does do it with more clearity and finess, but motorhead has that raw in your face kick your ass slap you in the chops to wake you up sound, you gota love them both man , they both truely define HEAVY METAL
|
|
| [Rik_] Sunday, May 01, 2011 7:32:44 AM | |
|
Might as well ask... Saxon or Slayer?
| |
|
jimmyjames wrote: |
| |
| This thread is fuckin' retarded the only thing Maiden and Motorhead have in common is they are both from England. |
Edited at: Sunday, May 01, 2011 7:33:35 AM |
|
| [casc9983] Saturday, April 30, 2011 6:04:15 PM | |
|
I thinking quickly... I say Motörhead!
|
|
| [nick2584] Monday, March 21, 2011 5:21:21 PM | |
|
Both are good but i like maiden more better songs better show and the music is much better |
|
| [jimmyjames] Wednesday, March 09, 2011 10:14:37 PM | |
|
Whereas Stryper doesn't?
[Show/Hide Quoted Message] (Quoting Message by EdgarV72 from Monday, February 28, 2011 11:55:07 PM)| | | EdgarV72 wrote: | | | Mötorhead by far, raw and uncomplicated, just like metal is supposed to be.... you know Maiden kinda lacks of power, rawness, heavyness, they are by far more commercial, mainstream, and their drums are kinda softie... |
|
|
| [soccer star] Tuesday, March 08, 2011 2:13:31 PM | |
|
I like both bands and i have seen both live but when it comes down to it Maiden are the better band...No contest.
Maiden are more consistent and have sold many more albums.
Maiden could headline any major fest in the world..Motorhead could not but i still like em. |
|
| [metallo] Tuesday, March 08, 2011 11:04:07 AM | |
|
Again ??
is more than a month I'm not writing and still to decide if Motorhead or Maiden ?
Motorhead |
|
