[Head banger] Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:21:54 PM
should have strangled him with a shoelace. go to the local district office and complain. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by hellrider 31038 from Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:42:55 PM)
hellrider 31038 wrote:
I PROBABLY WOULD NOT BE HEAR NOW .. WAS DESPERATE TO KEEP IT I WAS DRAGGING THE CONVERSATION ON HOPING THEY WOULD JUST LET ME KEEP IT.TOLD THEM I WOULD GRIND THE RIVOTS OFF THAT HOLD THE SPIKES ON WITH MY DREMEL.DID NOT WORK
NEEEEXXXTTTTTTTTTTTTT TIIMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEEEEEE WIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL BE DIFFERENT
Head banger wrote:
should have told him "you got another think coming"!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
That seemed to have been an illegal confiscation on the part of the officer, HR. This comes directly from Canada's legal code on the subject:
-----
39. The following goods generally do not meet the definition of a prohibited weapon, and thus do not fall under TI 9898.00.00. Their misuse may nonetheless be punishable under other laws:
(a) cloth, nylon or plastic wristbands which may be weak and not effective as weapons;
(b) wristbands with dull ‘studs’ which may not be effective as weapons;
(c) spiked necklaces, ankle bracelets, belts, boots, spiked gloves and gauntlets or any other item of jewellery or clothing to which spikes are affixed.
hellrider 31038 wrote:
ONE OF MY SPIKE GLOVES JUST GOT CONFISCATED RIDING HOME FROM A DENTAL APPOINTMENT
I AM FUUUUUCCCC???????EEENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN PIIIIIIIISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSEEEEDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
OH WELL HE GOT MY CHEAP ONE IT DID NOT MATCH MY OTHER SMALL ONE
AND I GOT MORE WHERE THAT CAME FROM
SAID HE DID NOT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH MY ATTIRE AND SPIKES ON MY HELMET IT WAS ONLY THE FIST
SO I GUESS THAT MEANS I CAN GET BIGGER SPIKES FOR THE HELMET AND I CAN WEAR MORE SPIKES AS LONG AS THEY ARE NOT ON MY FIST.
DONT BOTHER ANYONE AND THEY FUC?????????? YOU AROUND
