Discussions on sensitive and sometimes controversial subjects. PLAY NICE!!!!!
You do not have enough Respect Points to post in this topic.
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:20:58 AM
What Sean Hannity has said over all this time is that Bush Jr was left with a deficit.. from the clinton ADM..
The deficit was 10 trillion when clinton took office.. From BUSH SR... Clinton managed to get it down to 6 trillion.. so when he left office.. the remaining deficit that BUSH JR took over was still from his fathers legacy..
And remeber clinton.. ran the US under a republican.. house/congress.
I personally dont care.. But you wanted a fact so Iam giving you one.. Please dont PM me with this stuff because I dont live in the USA anymore.. thank god..
National Debt Graph: Bush Sets 50-Year Record
Click image below to enlarge.
Double Whammy: 50-Year Record on Sept. 22. $10 Trillion on Sept. 30, 2008.
The gross national debt compared to GDP (how rich we are) reached its lowest level since 1931 as Reagan took office. It skyrocketed for 12 years through Bush I. Clinton reversed it at a peak of 67%. Bush II crossed that line on Sept. 22 and hit 69% on Sept 30. That's the highest it's been since 1955 (53 years ago).
Bush did three things to skyrocket the debt from $5.7 trillion to $10 trillion:
1. He lowered taxes on the rich (by far the biggest item).
2. He invaded Iraq instead of winning in Afghan-Pakistan (another $600 B).
3. He loosened controls on Wall Street.
Sean Hannity is a liar? He's distorting the facts? I assume you can give a few good examples of this if you're going to make the accusation, right? I doubt you can so you'll just say it's not worth your time, but I hope you'll at least try.
As for FOX being a Republican network, let me remind you all that every cable news channel is liberal. CNN is very liberal, have been since Turner launched it.
MSNBC, PA-LEASE! They're the ANTI-FOX channel, which is why they have absolutely no ratings at all.
PBS is extremely liberal with people like Moyer and that Woman who just hosted the debate last week. She has a pro Obama book coming out on inauguration day... Totally liberal.
The big three are liberal too. CBS (Which O'Reilly beat in ratings) is in the tank for Obama. Remember Dan Blather? Lied, actually lied about GW's service record. Never did any checking for validation, just ran the story 52 days before the Presidential election.
The cute little video with these little girls singing to Obama, guess what, the head of imploding NBC was behind all of that, along with a few of Hollywood's camera men. But yeah, NBC's top exec was behind it.
ABC is the least offensive of the big three, but still offensive.
Lying is never rewarded with success when all of your truths are easilly checked and verified by an intrested public. This is why FOX is beating MSNBC and CNN combined every night, night after night. O'Reilly goes after both parties, Hannity and Combs give you each political ideological position, there's no masking any of it. Hannity is the second most listened to talk show in all of America, second only to Rush. There's a reason for that and it ain't because the audiences are loony right wing nutjobs. Rather, most listeners are pretty affluent, hard working people who want to know what's going on.
FOX news channel is by far the best source of information you can find anywhere on the dial, the best source of getting both sides of an issue
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
I must now agree with SOY.. ( OMG i thought i would never say that)
Now living in Canada I enjoy not having to deal with the day to riddles of these selfish people and thier lives, that are in politics in the USA.. Its to bad that they have choosen two DOLTS.. to have to plaster on television to decide who is going to run that crumbling country,
Iam sorry but sean Hannity has more secrets to hide than Obama or Mcain.. He twists facts, and only presents half of the stories, leaving out almost all of the real facts.. that of which can be found on any goverment website..
I feel sorry for the USA.. Its too bad that people listen to these talking heads to make thier political decsions for them.. instead of listening to thier own hearts. and to do what is right by family and real life values.
thats it..
end of fucking list!
Healer wrote:
Mark your calendars. This will probably stir the pot….
IS GOING TO AIR A VERY IMPORTANT DOCUMENTARY ABOUT BARACK OBAMA,
SUNDAY NIGHT AT 9:00 PM.
HE STATED ON THE AIR THIS EVENING THAT NO ONE IN THE NEWS MEDIA WAS WILLING TO DO THIS.
HANNITY IS GOING BACK TO OBAMA'S EARLIER DAYS, SHOWING EVEN THEN HIS TIES TO RADICAL PROFESSORS, FRIENDS, SPIRITUAL ADVISERS, Etc.,
HE STATED THIS EVENING THAT HE WILL SHOW IN DETAIL HIS TIES TO REV. WRIGHT FOR 20+ YRS (which we all know) HOW HE WAS PARTICIPATING WITH THIS MAN, AND NOT FOR THE REASONS HE STATES!
HE HAS UNCOVERED MORE OF OBAMA'S RADICAL LEADERS AND WE WILL SEE THINGS THAT NO ONE IN THE MEDIA IS WILLING TO PUT OUT THERE.
THIS WILL BE A NIGHT THAT YOU WILL KNOW MORE ABOUT OBAMA THAN EVER BEFORE.
HANNITY IS VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT THIS PROGRAM AND ASKED THAT EVERYONE PLEASE, PLEASE WATCH~~
SUNDAY NIGHT, 9 PM.
HANNITY IS DETERMINED THIS INFORMATION BE PUT OUT THERE BECAUSE AS AMERICAN'S,
WE STILL DO NOT KNOW ABOUT OBAMA!!
WAKE UP AMERICA !!
THIS IS SERIOUS,
EVERYONE. I KNOW MOST OF YOU WATCH FOX NEWS, AND YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE VOTING FOR,
BUT IF YOU CAN,
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
THIS IS CRITICAL FOR OUR COUNTRY.
MY PRAYER IS THAT WE, ALONG WITH SEAN HANNITY, WILL REACH SOMEONE/ANYONE BEFORE NOV. 4th.
[Painkiller1990] Monday, October 13, 2008 9:32:28 PM
Sean Hannity is a liar? He's distorting the facts? I assume you can give a few good examples of this if you're going to make the accusation, right? I doubt you can so you'll just say it's not worth your time, but I hope you'll at least try.
As for FOX being a Republican network, let me remind you all that every cable news channel is liberal. CNN is very liberal, have been since Turner launched it.
MSNBC, PA-LEASE! They're the ANTI-FOX channel, which is why they have absolutely no ratings at all.
PBS is extremely liberal with people like Moyer and that Woman who just hosted the debate last week. She has a pro Obama book coming out on inauguration day... Totally liberal.
The big three are liberal too. CBS (Which O'Reilly beat in ratings) is in the tank for Obama. Remember Dan Blather? Lied, actually lied about GW's service record. Never did any checking for validation, just ran the story 52 days before the Presidential election.
The cute little video with these little girls singing to Obama, guess what, the head of imploding NBC was behind all of that, along with a few of Hollywood's camera men. But yeah, NBC's top exec was behind it.
ABC is the least offensive of the big three, but still offensive.
Lying is never rewarded with success when all of your truths are easilly checked and verified by an intrested public. This is why FOX is beating MSNBC and CNN combined every night, night after night. O'Reilly goes after both parties, Hannity and Combs give you each political ideological position, there's no masking any of it. Hannity is the second most listened to talk show in all of America, second only to Rush. There's a reason for that and it ain't because the audiences are loony right wing nutjobs. Rather, most listeners are pretty affluent, hard working people who want to know what's going on.
FOX news channel is by far the best source of information you can find anywhere on the dial, the best source of getting both sides of an issue [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by MG_Metalgoddess from Sunday, October 12, 2008 9:34:03 PM)
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
I must now agree with SOY.. ( OMG i thought i would never say that)
Now living in Canada I enjoy not having to deal with the day to riddles of these selfish people and thier lives, that are in politics in the USA.. Its to bad that they have choosen two DOLTS.. to have to plaster on television to decide who is going to run that crumbling country,
Iam sorry but sean Hannity has more secrets to hide than Obama or Mcain.. He twists facts, and only presents half of the stories, leaving out almost all of the real facts.. that of which can be found on any goverment website..
I feel sorry for the USA.. Its too bad that people listen to these talking heads to make thier political decsions for them.. instead of listening to thier own hearts. and to do what is right by family and real life values.
thats it..
end of fucking list!
Healer wrote:
Mark your calendars. This will probably stir the pot….
IS GOING TO AIR A VERY IMPORTANT DOCUMENTARY ABOUT BARACK OBAMA,
SUNDAY NIGHT AT 9:00 PM.
HE STATED ON THE AIR THIS EVENING THAT NO ONE IN THE NEWS MEDIA WAS WILLING TO DO THIS.
HANNITY IS GOING BACK TO OBAMA'S EARLIER DAYS, SHOWING EVEN THEN HIS TIES TO RADICAL PROFESSORS, FRIENDS, SPIRITUAL ADVISERS, Etc.,
HE STATED THIS EVENING THAT HE WILL SHOW IN DETAIL HIS TIES TO REV. WRIGHT FOR 20+ YRS (which we all know) HOW HE WAS PARTICIPATING WITH THIS MAN, AND NOT FOR THE REASONS HE STATES!
HE HAS UNCOVERED MORE OF OBAMA'S RADICAL LEADERS AND WE WILL SEE THINGS THAT NO ONE IN THE MEDIA IS WILLING TO PUT OUT THERE.
THIS WILL BE A NIGHT THAT YOU WILL KNOW MORE ABOUT OBAMA THAN EVER BEFORE.
HANNITY IS VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT THIS PROGRAM AND ASKED THAT EVERYONE PLEASE, PLEASE WATCH~~
SUNDAY NIGHT, 9 PM.
HANNITY IS DETERMINED THIS INFORMATION BE PUT OUT THERE BECAUSE AS AMERICAN'S,
WE STILL DO NOT KNOW ABOUT OBAMA!!
WAKE UP AMERICA !!
THIS IS SERIOUS,
EVERYONE. I KNOW MOST OF YOU WATCH FOX NEWS, AND YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE VOTING FOR,
BUT IF YOU CAN,
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
THIS IS CRITICAL FOR OUR COUNTRY.
MY PRAYER IS THAT WE, ALONG WITH SEAN HANNITY, WILL REACH SOMEONE/ANYONE BEFORE NOV. 4th.
[Head banger] Monday, October 13, 2008 9:21:04 PM
good, you can come, and bring more like you. I also think there should be a 2 year wait for welfare or any govt assistance. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by WhiskeyWoman from Monday, October 13, 2008 2:05:41 PM)
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
I'm really glad to hear that HB...
'coz I'm a fairly decent, hard-working immigrant!
Lol...
Head banger wrote:
well, the latest gang shooting in Calgary was between 2 gangs from ottawa. of course they are probably imigrants who went to ottawa before learning there is more cash here. we should deport all criminals who are in the process of or have imigrated here in the last 2 years. just kick them out. no serving a sentance, send them home. I know lots of imigrants who are decent hard working people, thats the ones we need to keep.
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Good one...
And, d'ya remember recently...? Some MP got in 'hot-water' for saying it like it is, but everyone has to be so PC these days that it's getting absurd. He said, "Well, look around. Most of the crimes being committed are not being committed by the kid who grew up next door." Ouch. But, it's kind of true... more gangs in our cities that are not Canadian...
Can't even tell the truth these days.
Head banger wrote:
I dont mind people doing all kinds of things, speaking what they want, but when I have to pay to have some damn govt form translated, thats crap. if I have to fund their traditions, they must not mean much. if it did, they would fund it. and if their traditions include threatening the police with a machette, then get used to trial by glock. otherwise, go somewhere beter.
with all the bitching their must be places beter.
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Morning HB... Sorry to hear of your plight last night. Nyquil is too chemical for me... (like to keep it natural) -- from a can (no shit). Call me...
Just commenting on your 'please speak English' subject that touches on others that we deal with here in Canada where a lot of our laws have been 'modified', to accommodate other cultures -- which should be a good thing. But, when 'guests' come to this country demanding and expecting us to change our ways for them, it turns into something else.
A few years ago, Australia caught all kinds of flak when the Prime Minister issued a statement that (loosely) said... (I've since lost the emailed speech in some pc crash, so maybe our Aussie friend's can chime in) ...
"This is our country, we will respect your cultures and religions, but you must respect ours first. Basically, if you don't like it here, the way it is, another freedom we have -- is the right to leave." lol...
Head banger wrote:
I guess people get what they deserve. we will elect a new minority govt on tuesday, and will acomplish nothing. there is no way to effect change, even if that were a goal of a govt with a minority.
yes, english would be nice. I read that criminals in the states (and here too) have the right to have their trial translated into their own language. OK, shouldnt be much of an issue. then I read that 37 states employ translators for Klingon. WTF? what are the odds that someone who can speak Klingon a) found their way oyut of mommys basement to comit said crime, and b) doesnt speak english also?
Deep Freeze wrote:
All very valid points, HB. I agree with you. I realize it will not happen but it certainly should. I am also against drivers that cannot read the language of the realm. If you live here, speak English (how ever poorly) and read it as well. As for credit, let's just say that I abhor it. I loath it. It is the single most common factor in financial destruction. I should probably stop as I will get on another rant.
Head banger wrote:
Ah, but then we would also need to test peoples knowledge and inteligence for such things as having children, serving on a jury. perhaps also we could give a decent test of thoughts for credit. no, lets not get into credit. or driving, where do these fools get their licences, a crackerjack box? we should periodicaly re test them too.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I have made it a point to remain quiet regarding politics since my return. As we get closer to November, the rhetoric gets worse and facts become blurred by nonsense and pointless argument.
The truly unfortunate fact of the matter is the public at large are the "morons", not the candidiates. The political folks simply do what they do. It is really up to the people to think about what they are doing and cast a vote accordingly. Worse, the majority of the voting public would not know an issue from a tissue and would wipe their collective butts with it ( to borrow loosely from Lou Reed)
It has long been my opinion that NO ONE under thirty should be allowed to vote. (I realize the younger crowd on the Board are lighting the barbeque now to roast me) Quite frankly, EVERYONE should have to pass a civics exam prior to getting a voting card. The public, in general, have NO idea what they are doing, which is why the likes of an Obama or a Hillary get a chance in the first place. There, I said it.
The system is not going to change. The word change has been tossed about all election long, like there is suddenly this revelation among the population, courtesy of some clown campaigning for office, and they all suddenly 'get it' and will forge bravely into a new future. Bah!! Not going to happen. The change is NOT needed in government, it is needed in the public. That is where the problem is and will continue to be.
Edited at: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:01:17 AM
[Head banger] Monday, October 13, 2008 9:20:09 PM
and getting sent back to the USA is a picnic compared to where some of these nuts come from. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by MG_Metalgoddess from Monday, October 13, 2008 5:57:26 PM)
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
I agree.. with HB.. You cannot get in the country with a felony on your record.. you have to wait 10 years and then go infront of a board and hope they pardon you, in order to get resident or citizen status.. SO once you are allready here it should be no different.. If you committ a crime you should be sent back. .. That is what they told me.. When I got my perm resident card.. that even though I have no prior.. record.. If I get arrested of committ a felony under Canadian law they can deport me back to the usa.. I was like OMG.. And I do-not want to go back to the USA.. that would be a prison sentence in itself..
Head banger wrote:
well, the latest gang shooting in Calgary was between 2 gangs from ottawa. of course they are probably imigrants who went to ottawa before learning there is more cash here. we should deport all criminals who are in the process of or have imigrated here in the last 2 years. just kick them out. no serving a sentance, send them home. I know lots of imigrants who are decent hard working people, thats the ones we need to keep.
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Good one...
And, d'ya remember recently...? Some MP got in 'hot-water' for saying it like it is, but everyone has to be so PC these days that it's getting absurd. He said, "Well, look around. Most of the crimes being committed are not being committed by the kid who grew up next door." Ouch. But, it's kind of true... more gangs in our cities that are not Canadian...
Can't even tell the truth these days.
Head banger wrote:
I dont mind people doing all kinds of things, speaking what they want, but when I have to pay to have some damn govt form translated, thats crap. if I have to fund their traditions, they must not mean much. if it did, they would fund it. and if their traditions include threatening the police with a machette, then get used to trial by glock. otherwise, go somewhere beter.
with all the bitching their must be places beter.
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Morning HB... Sorry to hear of your plight last night. Nyquil is too chemical for me... (like to keep it natural) -- from a can (no shit). Call me...
Just commenting on your 'please speak English' subject that touches on others that we deal with here in Canada where a lot of our laws have been 'modified', to accommodate other cultures -- which should be a good thing. But, when 'guests' come to this country demanding and expecting us to change our ways for them, it turns into something else.
A few years ago, Australia caught all kinds of flak when the Prime Minister issued a statement that (loosely) said... (I've since lost the emailed speech in some pc crash, so maybe our Aussie friend's can chime in) ...
"This is our country, we will respect your cultures and religions, but you must respect ours first. Basically, if you don't like it here, the way it is, another freedom we have -- is the right to leave." lol...
Head banger wrote:
I guess people get what they deserve. we will elect a new minority govt on tuesday, and will acomplish nothing. there is no way to effect change, even if that were a goal of a govt with a minority.
yes, english would be nice. I read that criminals in the states (and here too) have the right to have their trial translated into their own language. OK, shouldnt be much of an issue. then I read that 37 states employ translators for Klingon. WTF? what are the odds that someone who can speak Klingon a) found their way oyut of mommys basement to comit said crime, and b) doesnt speak english also?
Deep Freeze wrote:
All very valid points, HB. I agree with you. I realize it will not happen but it certainly should. I am also against drivers that cannot read the language of the realm. If you live here, speak English (how ever poorly) and read it as well. As for credit, let's just say that I abhor it. I loath it. It is the single most common factor in financial destruction. I should probably stop as I will get on another rant.
Head banger wrote:
Ah, but then we would also need to test peoples knowledge and inteligence for such things as having children, serving on a jury. perhaps also we could give a decent test of thoughts for credit. no, lets not get into credit. or driving, where do these fools get their licences, a crackerjack box? we should periodicaly re test them too.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I have made it a point to remain quiet regarding politics since my return. As we get closer to November, the rhetoric gets worse and facts become blurred by nonsense and pointless argument.
The truly unfortunate fact of the matter is the public at large are the "morons", not the candidiates. The political folks simply do what they do. It is really up to the people to think about what they are doing and cast a vote accordingly. Worse, the majority of the voting public would not know an issue from a tissue and would wipe their collective butts with it ( to borrow loosely from Lou Reed)
It has long been my opinion that NO ONE under thirty should be allowed to vote. (I realize the younger crowd on the Board are lighting the barbeque now to roast me) Quite frankly, EVERYONE should have to pass a civics exam prior to getting a voting card. The public, in general, have NO idea what they are doing, which is why the likes of an Obama or a Hillary get a chance in the first place. There, I said it.
The system is not going to change. The word change has been tossed about all election long, like there is suddenly this revelation among the population, courtesy of some clown campaigning for office, and they all suddenly 'get it' and will forge bravely into a new future. Bah!! Not going to happen. The change is NOT needed in government, it is needed in the public. That is where the problem is and will continue to be.
Edited at: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:01:17 AM
[Soylentgreen4u] Monday, October 13, 2008 7:14:40 PM
HERE'S HOPING EVERYONE THAT'S ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THIS COUNTRY DOES SO.........
REMEMBER...YA' CAN'T COMPLAIN,IF YOU DON'T VOTE!...
[Soylentgreen4u] Monday, October 13, 2008 6:57:24 PM
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH OK THEN...NOW STOP IT,YOURE MAKIN' ME ALL MISTY-EYED...
Aaaawwww Soy you know you are still my little LOONIE.....
who loves ya baby...... I do.............
HUgs
MG~
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
"NOW JUST WHAT THE HELL IS THAT SUPPOSED TO MEAN?"...(OMG I THOUGHT I WOULD NEVER SAY THAT)........WHYYYYYYYYYYYY OHHHHH WHYYYYYY MUST YOU BE SOOOOOOO GODDAMN MEAN TO ME?!!!!!!.....
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
I must now agree with SOY.. ( OMG i thought i would never say that)
Now living in Canada I enjoy not having to deal with the day to riddles of these selfish people and thier lives, that are in politics in the USA.. Its to bad that they have choosen two DOLTS.. to have to plaster on television to decide who is going to run that crumbling country,
Iam sorry but sean Hannity has more secrets to hide than Obama or Mcain.. He twists facts, and only presents half of the stories, leaving out almost all of the real facts.. that of which can be found on any goverment website..
I feel sorry for the USA.. Its too bad that people listen to these talking heads to make thier political decsions for them.. instead of listening to thier own hearts. and to do what is right by family and real life values.
thats it..
end of fucking list!
Healer wrote:
Mark your calendars. This will probably stir the pot….
IS GOING TO AIR A VERY IMPORTANT DOCUMENTARY ABOUT BARACK OBAMA,
SUNDAY NIGHT AT 9:00 PM.
HE STATED ON THE AIR THIS EVENING THAT NO ONE IN THE NEWS MEDIA WAS WILLING TO DO THIS.
HANNITY IS GOING BACK TO OBAMA'S EARLIER DAYS, SHOWING EVEN THEN HIS TIES TO RADICAL PROFESSORS, FRIENDS, SPIRITUAL ADVISERS, Etc.,
HE STATED THIS EVENING THAT HE WILL SHOW IN DETAIL HIS TIES TO REV. WRIGHT FOR 20+ YRS (which we all know) HOW HE WAS PARTICIPATING WITH THIS MAN, AND NOT FOR THE REASONS HE STATES!
HE HAS UNCOVERED MORE OF OBAMA'S RADICAL LEADERS AND WE WILL SEE THINGS THAT NO ONE IN THE MEDIA IS WILLING TO PUT OUT THERE.
THIS WILL BE A NIGHT THAT YOU WILL KNOW MORE ABOUT OBAMA THAN EVER BEFORE.
HANNITY IS VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT THIS PROGRAM AND ASKED THAT EVERYONE PLEASE, PLEASE WATCH~~
SUNDAY NIGHT, 9 PM.
HANNITY IS DETERMINED THIS INFORMATION BE PUT OUT THERE BECAUSE AS AMERICAN'S,
WE STILL DO NOT KNOW ABOUT OBAMA!!
WAKE UP AMERICA !!
THIS IS SERIOUS,
EVERYONE. I KNOW MOST OF YOU WATCH FOX NEWS, AND YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE VOTING FOR,
BUT IF YOU CAN,
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
THIS IS CRITICAL FOR OUR COUNTRY.
MY PRAYER IS THAT WE, ALONG WITH SEAN HANNITY, WILL REACH SOMEONE/ANYONE BEFORE NOV. 4th.
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Monday, October 13, 2008 5:59:38 PM
Aaaawwww Soy you know you are still my little LOONIE.....
"NOW JUST WHAT THE HELL IS THAT SUPPOSED TO MEAN?"...(OMG I THOUGHT I WOULD NEVER SAY THAT)........WHYYYYYYYYYYYY OHHHHH WHYYYYYY MUST YOU BE SOOOOOOO GODDAMN MEAN TO ME?!!!!!!.....
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
I must now agree with SOY.. ( OMG i thought i would never say that)
Now living in Canada I enjoy not having to deal with the day to riddles of these selfish people and thier lives, that are in politics in the USA.. Its to bad that they have choosen two DOLTS.. to have to plaster on television to decide who is going to run that crumbling country,
Iam sorry but sean Hannity has more secrets to hide than Obama or Mcain.. He twists facts, and only presents half of the stories, leaving out almost all of the real facts.. that of which can be found on any goverment website..
I feel sorry for the USA.. Its too bad that people listen to these talking heads to make thier political decsions for them.. instead of listening to thier own hearts. and to do what is right by family and real life values.
thats it..
end of fucking list!
Healer wrote:
Mark your calendars. This will probably stir the pot….
IS GOING TO AIR A VERY IMPORTANT DOCUMENTARY ABOUT BARACK OBAMA,
SUNDAY NIGHT AT 9:00 PM.
HE STATED ON THE AIR THIS EVENING THAT NO ONE IN THE NEWS MEDIA WAS WILLING TO DO THIS.
HANNITY IS GOING BACK TO OBAMA'S EARLIER DAYS, SHOWING EVEN THEN HIS TIES TO RADICAL PROFESSORS, FRIENDS, SPIRITUAL ADVISERS, Etc.,
HE STATED THIS EVENING THAT HE WILL SHOW IN DETAIL HIS TIES TO REV. WRIGHT FOR 20+ YRS (which we all know) HOW HE WAS PARTICIPATING WITH THIS MAN, AND NOT FOR THE REASONS HE STATES!
HE HAS UNCOVERED MORE OF OBAMA'S RADICAL LEADERS AND WE WILL SEE THINGS THAT NO ONE IN THE MEDIA IS WILLING TO PUT OUT THERE.
THIS WILL BE A NIGHT THAT YOU WILL KNOW MORE ABOUT OBAMA THAN EVER BEFORE.
HANNITY IS VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT THIS PROGRAM AND ASKED THAT EVERYONE PLEASE, PLEASE WATCH~~
SUNDAY NIGHT, 9 PM.
HANNITY IS DETERMINED THIS INFORMATION BE PUT OUT THERE BECAUSE AS AMERICAN'S,
WE STILL DO NOT KNOW ABOUT OBAMA!!
WAKE UP AMERICA !!
THIS IS SERIOUS,
EVERYONE. I KNOW MOST OF YOU WATCH FOX NEWS, AND YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE VOTING FOR,
BUT IF YOU CAN,
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
THIS IS CRITICAL FOR OUR COUNTRY.
MY PRAYER IS THAT WE, ALONG WITH SEAN HANNITY, WILL REACH SOMEONE/ANYONE BEFORE NOV. 4th.
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Monday, October 13, 2008 5:57:26 PM
I agree.. with HB.. You cannot get in the country with a felony on your record.. you have to wait 10 years and then go infront of a board and hope they pardon you, in order to get resident or citizen status.. SO once you are allready here it should be no different.. If you committ a crime you should be sent back. .. That is what they told me.. When I got my perm resident card.. that even though I have no prior.. record.. If I get arrested of committ a felony under Canadian law they can deport me back to the usa.. I was like OMG.. And I do-not want to go back to the USA.. that would be a prison sentence in itself.. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Monday, October 13, 2008 1:45:46 PM)
Head banger wrote:
well, the latest gang shooting in Calgary was between 2 gangs from ottawa. of course they are probably imigrants who went to ottawa before learning there is more cash here. we should deport all criminals who are in the process of or have imigrated here in the last 2 years. just kick them out. no serving a sentance, send them home. I know lots of imigrants who are decent hard working people, thats the ones we need to keep.
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Good one...
And, d'ya remember recently...? Some MP got in 'hot-water' for saying it like it is, but everyone has to be so PC these days that it's getting absurd. He said, "Well, look around. Most of the crimes being committed are not being committed by the kid who grew up next door." Ouch. But, it's kind of true... more gangs in our cities that are not Canadian...
Can't even tell the truth these days.
Head banger wrote:
I dont mind people doing all kinds of things, speaking what they want, but when I have to pay to have some damn govt form translated, thats crap. if I have to fund their traditions, they must not mean much. if it did, they would fund it. and if their traditions include threatening the police with a machette, then get used to trial by glock. otherwise, go somewhere beter.
with all the bitching their must be places beter.
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Morning HB... Sorry to hear of your plight last night. Nyquil is too chemical for me... (like to keep it natural) -- from a can (no shit). Call me...
Just commenting on your 'please speak English' subject that touches on others that we deal with here in Canada where a lot of our laws have been 'modified', to accommodate other cultures -- which should be a good thing. But, when 'guests' come to this country demanding and expecting us to change our ways for them, it turns into something else.
A few years ago, Australia caught all kinds of flak when the Prime Minister issued a statement that (loosely) said... (I've since lost the emailed speech in some pc crash, so maybe our Aussie friend's can chime in) ...
"This is our country, we will respect your cultures and religions, but you must respect ours first. Basically, if you don't like it here, the way it is, another freedom we have -- is the right to leave." lol...
Head banger wrote:
I guess people get what they deserve. we will elect a new minority govt on tuesday, and will acomplish nothing. there is no way to effect change, even if that were a goal of a govt with a minority.
yes, english would be nice. I read that criminals in the states (and here too) have the right to have their trial translated into their own language. OK, shouldnt be much of an issue. then I read that 37 states employ translators for Klingon. WTF? what are the odds that someone who can speak Klingon a) found their way oyut of mommys basement to comit said crime, and b) doesnt speak english also?
Deep Freeze wrote:
All very valid points, HB. I agree with you. I realize it will not happen but it certainly should. I am also against drivers that cannot read the language of the realm. If you live here, speak English (how ever poorly) and read it as well. As for credit, let's just say that I abhor it. I loath it. It is the single most common factor in financial destruction. I should probably stop as I will get on another rant.
Head banger wrote:
Ah, but then we would also need to test peoples knowledge and inteligence for such things as having children, serving on a jury. perhaps also we could give a decent test of thoughts for credit. no, lets not get into credit. or driving, where do these fools get their licences, a crackerjack box? we should periodicaly re test them too.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I have made it a point to remain quiet regarding politics since my return. As we get closer to November, the rhetoric gets worse and facts become blurred by nonsense and pointless argument.
The truly unfortunate fact of the matter is the public at large are the "morons", not the candidiates. The political folks simply do what they do. It is really up to the people to think about what they are doing and cast a vote accordingly. Worse, the majority of the voting public would not know an issue from a tissue and would wipe their collective butts with it ( to borrow loosely from Lou Reed)
It has long been my opinion that NO ONE under thirty should be allowed to vote. (I realize the younger crowd on the Board are lighting the barbeque now to roast me) Quite frankly, EVERYONE should have to pass a civics exam prior to getting a voting card. The public, in general, have NO idea what they are doing, which is why the likes of an Obama or a Hillary get a chance in the first place. There, I said it.
The system is not going to change. The word change has been tossed about all election long, like there is suddenly this revelation among the population, courtesy of some clown campaigning for office, and they all suddenly 'get it' and will forge bravely into a new future. Bah!! Not going to happen. The change is NOT needed in government, it is needed in the public. That is where the problem is and will continue to be.
Edited at: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:01:17 AM
[WhiskeyWoman] Monday, October 13, 2008 2:05:41 PM
I'm really glad to hear that HB...
'coz I'm a fairly decent, hard-working immigrant!
Lol... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Monday, October 13, 2008 1:45:46 PM)
Head banger wrote:
well, the latest gang shooting in Calgary was between 2 gangs from ottawa. of course they are probably imigrants who went to ottawa before learning there is more cash here. we should deport all criminals who are in the process of or have imigrated here in the last 2 years. just kick them out. no serving a sentance, send them home. I know lots of imigrants who are decent hard working people, thats the ones we need to keep.
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Good one...
And, d'ya remember recently...? Some MP got in 'hot-water' for saying it like it is, but everyone has to be so PC these days that it's getting absurd. He said, "Well, look around. Most of the crimes being committed are not being committed by the kid who grew up next door." Ouch. But, it's kind of true... more gangs in our cities that are not Canadian...
Can't even tell the truth these days.
Head banger wrote:
I dont mind people doing all kinds of things, speaking what they want, but when I have to pay to have some damn govt form translated, thats crap. if I have to fund their traditions, they must not mean much. if it did, they would fund it. and if their traditions include threatening the police with a machette, then get used to trial by glock. otherwise, go somewhere beter.
with all the bitching their must be places beter.
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Morning HB... Sorry to hear of your plight last night. Nyquil is too chemical for me... (like to keep it natural) -- from a can (no shit). Call me...
Just commenting on your 'please speak English' subject that touches on others that we deal with here in Canada where a lot of our laws have been 'modified', to accommodate other cultures -- which should be a good thing. But, when 'guests' come to this country demanding and expecting us to change our ways for them, it turns into something else.
A few years ago, Australia caught all kinds of flak when the Prime Minister issued a statement that (loosely) said... (I've since lost the emailed speech in some pc crash, so maybe our Aussie friend's can chime in) ...
"This is our country, we will respect your cultures and religions, but you must respect ours first. Basically, if you don't like it here, the way it is, another freedom we have -- is the right to leave." lol...
Head banger wrote:
I guess people get what they deserve. we will elect a new minority govt on tuesday, and will acomplish nothing. there is no way to effect change, even if that were a goal of a govt with a minority.
yes, english would be nice. I read that criminals in the states (and here too) have the right to have their trial translated into their own language. OK, shouldnt be much of an issue. then I read that 37 states employ translators for Klingon. WTF? what are the odds that someone who can speak Klingon a) found their way oyut of mommys basement to comit said crime, and b) doesnt speak english also?
Deep Freeze wrote:
All very valid points, HB. I agree with you. I realize it will not happen but it certainly should. I am also against drivers that cannot read the language of the realm. If you live here, speak English (how ever poorly) and read it as well. As for credit, let's just say that I abhor it. I loath it. It is the single most common factor in financial destruction. I should probably stop as I will get on another rant.
Head banger wrote:
Ah, but then we would also need to test peoples knowledge and inteligence for such things as having children, serving on a jury. perhaps also we could give a decent test of thoughts for credit. no, lets not get into credit. or driving, where do these fools get their licences, a crackerjack box? we should periodicaly re test them too.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I have made it a point to remain quiet regarding politics since my return. As we get closer to November, the rhetoric gets worse and facts become blurred by nonsense and pointless argument.
The truly unfortunate fact of the matter is the public at large are the "morons", not the candidiates. The political folks simply do what they do. It is really up to the people to think about what they are doing and cast a vote accordingly. Worse, the majority of the voting public would not know an issue from a tissue and would wipe their collective butts with it ( to borrow loosely from Lou Reed)
It has long been my opinion that NO ONE under thirty should be allowed to vote. (I realize the younger crowd on the Board are lighting the barbeque now to roast me) Quite frankly, EVERYONE should have to pass a civics exam prior to getting a voting card. The public, in general, have NO idea what they are doing, which is why the likes of an Obama or a Hillary get a chance in the first place. There, I said it.
The system is not going to change. The word change has been tossed about all election long, like there is suddenly this revelation among the population, courtesy of some clown campaigning for office, and they all suddenly 'get it' and will forge bravely into a new future. Bah!! Not going to happen. The change is NOT needed in government, it is needed in the public. That is where the problem is and will continue to be.
Edited at: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:01:17 AM
[Head banger] Monday, October 13, 2008 1:45:46 PM
well, the latest gang shooting in Calgary was between 2 gangs from ottawa. of course they are probably imigrants who went to ottawa before learning there is more cash here. we should deport all criminals who are in the process of or have imigrated here in the last 2 years. just kick them out. no serving a sentance, send them home. I know lots of imigrants who are decent hard working people, thats the ones we need to keep. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by WhiskeyWoman from Monday, October 13, 2008 11:52:45 AM)
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Good one...
And, d'ya remember recently...? Some MP got in 'hot-water' for saying it like it is, but everyone has to be so PC these days that it's getting absurd. He said, "Well, look around. Most of the crimes being committed are not being committed by the kid who grew up next door." Ouch. But, it's kind of true... more gangs in our cities that are not Canadian...
Can't even tell the truth these days.
Head banger wrote:
I dont mind people doing all kinds of things, speaking what they want, but when I have to pay to have some damn govt form translated, thats crap. if I have to fund their traditions, they must not mean much. if it did, they would fund it. and if their traditions include threatening the police with a machette, then get used to trial by glock. otherwise, go somewhere beter.
with all the bitching their must be places beter.
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Morning HB... Sorry to hear of your plight last night. Nyquil is too chemical for me... (like to keep it natural) -- from a can (no shit). Call me...
Just commenting on your 'please speak English' subject that touches on others that we deal with here in Canada where a lot of our laws have been 'modified', to accommodate other cultures -- which should be a good thing. But, when 'guests' come to this country demanding and expecting us to change our ways for them, it turns into something else.
A few years ago, Australia caught all kinds of flak when the Prime Minister issued a statement that (loosely) said... (I've since lost the emailed speech in some pc crash, so maybe our Aussie friend's can chime in) ...
"This is our country, we will respect your cultures and religions, but you must respect ours first. Basically, if you don't like it here, the way it is, another freedom we have -- is the right to leave." lol...
Head banger wrote:
I guess people get what they deserve. we will elect a new minority govt on tuesday, and will acomplish nothing. there is no way to effect change, even if that were a goal of a govt with a minority.
yes, english would be nice. I read that criminals in the states (and here too) have the right to have their trial translated into their own language. OK, shouldnt be much of an issue. then I read that 37 states employ translators for Klingon. WTF? what are the odds that someone who can speak Klingon a) found their way oyut of mommys basement to comit said crime, and b) doesnt speak english also?
Deep Freeze wrote:
All very valid points, HB. I agree with you. I realize it will not happen but it certainly should. I am also against drivers that cannot read the language of the realm. If you live here, speak English (how ever poorly) and read it as well. As for credit, let's just say that I abhor it. I loath it. It is the single most common factor in financial destruction. I should probably stop as I will get on another rant.
Head banger wrote:
Ah, but then we would also need to test peoples knowledge and inteligence for such things as having children, serving on a jury. perhaps also we could give a decent test of thoughts for credit. no, lets not get into credit. or driving, where do these fools get their licences, a crackerjack box? we should periodicaly re test them too.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I have made it a point to remain quiet regarding politics since my return. As we get closer to November, the rhetoric gets worse and facts become blurred by nonsense and pointless argument.
The truly unfortunate fact of the matter is the public at large are the "morons", not the candidiates. The political folks simply do what they do. It is really up to the people to think about what they are doing and cast a vote accordingly. Worse, the majority of the voting public would not know an issue from a tissue and would wipe their collective butts with it ( to borrow loosely from Lou Reed)
It has long been my opinion that NO ONE under thirty should be allowed to vote. (I realize the younger crowd on the Board are lighting the barbeque now to roast me) Quite frankly, EVERYONE should have to pass a civics exam prior to getting a voting card. The public, in general, have NO idea what they are doing, which is why the likes of an Obama or a Hillary get a chance in the first place. There, I said it.
The system is not going to change. The word change has been tossed about all election long, like there is suddenly this revelation among the population, courtesy of some clown campaigning for office, and they all suddenly 'get it' and will forge bravely into a new future. Bah!! Not going to happen. The change is NOT needed in government, it is needed in the public. That is where the problem is and will continue to be.
Edited at: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:01:17 AM
[WhiskeyWoman] Monday, October 13, 2008 11:52:45 AM
Good one...
And, d'ya remember recently...? Some MP got in 'hot-water' for saying it like it is, but everyone has to be so PC these days that it's getting absurd. He said, "Well, look around. Most of the crimes being committed are not being committed by the kid who grew up next door." Ouch. But, it's kind of true... more gangs in our cities that are not Canadian...
I dont mind people doing all kinds of things, speaking what they want, but when I have to pay to have some damn govt form translated, thats crap. if I have to fund their traditions, they must not mean much. if it did, they would fund it. and if their traditions include threatening the police with a machette, then get used to trial by glock. otherwise, go somewhere beter.
with all the bitching their must be places beter.
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Morning HB... Sorry to hear of your plight last night. Nyquil is too chemical for me... (like to keep it natural) -- from a can (no shit). Call me...
Just commenting on your 'please speak English' subject that touches on others that we deal with here in Canada where a lot of our laws have been 'modified', to accommodate other cultures -- which should be a good thing. But, when 'guests' come to this country demanding and expecting us to change our ways for them, it turns into something else.
A few years ago, Australia caught all kinds of flak when the Prime Minister issued a statement that (loosely) said... (I've since lost the emailed speech in some pc crash, so maybe our Aussie friend's can chime in) ...
"This is our country, we will respect your cultures and religions, but you must respect ours first. Basically, if you don't like it here, the way it is, another freedom we have -- is the right to leave." lol...
Head banger wrote:
I guess people get what they deserve. we will elect a new minority govt on tuesday, and will acomplish nothing. there is no way to effect change, even if that were a goal of a govt with a minority.
yes, english would be nice. I read that criminals in the states (and here too) have the right to have their trial translated into their own language. OK, shouldnt be much of an issue. then I read that 37 states employ translators for Klingon. WTF? what are the odds that someone who can speak Klingon a) found their way oyut of mommys basement to comit said crime, and b) doesnt speak english also?
Deep Freeze wrote:
All very valid points, HB. I agree with you. I realize it will not happen but it certainly should. I am also against drivers that cannot read the language of the realm. If you live here, speak English (how ever poorly) and read it as well. As for credit, let's just say that I abhor it. I loath it. It is the single most common factor in financial destruction. I should probably stop as I will get on another rant.
Head banger wrote:
Ah, but then we would also need to test peoples knowledge and inteligence for such things as having children, serving on a jury. perhaps also we could give a decent test of thoughts for credit. no, lets not get into credit. or driving, where do these fools get their licences, a crackerjack box? we should periodicaly re test them too.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I have made it a point to remain quiet regarding politics since my return. As we get closer to November, the rhetoric gets worse and facts become blurred by nonsense and pointless argument.
The truly unfortunate fact of the matter is the public at large are the "morons", not the candidiates. The political folks simply do what they do. It is really up to the people to think about what they are doing and cast a vote accordingly. Worse, the majority of the voting public would not know an issue from a tissue and would wipe their collective butts with it ( to borrow loosely from Lou Reed)
It has long been my opinion that NO ONE under thirty should be allowed to vote. (I realize the younger crowd on the Board are lighting the barbeque now to roast me) Quite frankly, EVERYONE should have to pass a civics exam prior to getting a voting card. The public, in general, have NO idea what they are doing, which is why the likes of an Obama or a Hillary get a chance in the first place. There, I said it.
The system is not going to change. The word change has been tossed about all election long, like there is suddenly this revelation among the population, courtesy of some clown campaigning for office, and they all suddenly 'get it' and will forge bravely into a new future. Bah!! Not going to happen. The change is NOT needed in government, it is needed in the public. That is where the problem is and will continue to be.
Edited at: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:01:17 AM
[Head banger] Monday, October 13, 2008 11:39:15 AM
I dont mind people doing all kinds of things, speaking what they want, but when I have to pay to have some damn govt form translated, thats crap. if I have to fund their traditions, they must not mean much. if it did, they would fund it. and if their traditions include threatening the police with a machette, then get used to trial by glock. otherwise, go somewhere beter.
with all the bitching their must be places beter. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by WhiskeyWoman from Monday, October 13, 2008 9:49:09 AM)
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Morning HB... Sorry to hear of your plight last night. Nyquil is too chemical for me... (like to keep it natural) -- from a can (no shit). Call me...
Just commenting on your 'please speak English' subject that touches on others that we deal with here in Canada where a lot of our laws have been 'modified', to accommodate other cultures -- which should be a good thing. But, when 'guests' come to this country demanding and expecting us to change our ways for them, it turns into something else.
A few years ago, Australia caught all kinds of flak when the Prime Minister issued a statement that (loosely) said... (I've since lost the emailed speech in some pc crash, so maybe our Aussie friend's can chime in) ...
"This is our country, we will respect your cultures and religions, but you must respect ours first. Basically, if you don't like it here, the way it is, another freedom we have -- is the right to leave." lol...
Head banger wrote:
I guess people get what they deserve. we will elect a new minority govt on tuesday, and will acomplish nothing. there is no way to effect change, even if that were a goal of a govt with a minority.
yes, english would be nice. I read that criminals in the states (and here too) have the right to have their trial translated into their own language. OK, shouldnt be much of an issue. then I read that 37 states employ translators for Klingon. WTF? what are the odds that someone who can speak Klingon a) found their way oyut of mommys basement to comit said crime, and b) doesnt speak english also?
Deep Freeze wrote:
All very valid points, HB. I agree with you. I realize it will not happen but it certainly should. I am also against drivers that cannot read the language of the realm. If you live here, speak English (how ever poorly) and read it as well. As for credit, let's just say that I abhor it. I loath it. It is the single most common factor in financial destruction. I should probably stop as I will get on another rant.
Head banger wrote:
Ah, but then we would also need to test peoples knowledge and inteligence for such things as having children, serving on a jury. perhaps also we could give a decent test of thoughts for credit. no, lets not get into credit. or driving, where do these fools get their licences, a crackerjack box? we should periodicaly re test them too.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I have made it a point to remain quiet regarding politics since my return. As we get closer to November, the rhetoric gets worse and facts become blurred by nonsense and pointless argument.
The truly unfortunate fact of the matter is the public at large are the "morons", not the candidiates. The political folks simply do what they do. It is really up to the people to think about what they are doing and cast a vote accordingly. Worse, the majority of the voting public would not know an issue from a tissue and would wipe their collective butts with it ( to borrow loosely from Lou Reed)
It has long been my opinion that NO ONE under thirty should be allowed to vote. (I realize the younger crowd on the Board are lighting the barbeque now to roast me) Quite frankly, EVERYONE should have to pass a civics exam prior to getting a voting card. The public, in general, have NO idea what they are doing, which is why the likes of an Obama or a Hillary get a chance in the first place. There, I said it.
The system is not going to change. The word change has been tossed about all election long, like there is suddenly this revelation among the population, courtesy of some clown campaigning for office, and they all suddenly 'get it' and will forge bravely into a new future. Bah!! Not going to happen. The change is NOT needed in government, it is needed in the public. That is where the problem is and will continue to be.
Edited at: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:01:17 AM
[WhiskeyWoman] Monday, October 13, 2008 9:49:09 AM
Morning HB... Sorry to hear of your plight last night. Nyquil is too chemical for me... (like to keep it natural) -- from a can (no shit). Call me...
Just commenting on your 'please speak English' subject that touches on others that we deal with here in Canada where a lot of our laws have been 'modified', to accommodate other cultures -- which should be a good thing. But, when 'guests' come to this country demanding and expecting us to change our ways for them, it turns into something else.
A few years ago, Australia caught all kinds of flak when the Prime Minister issued a statement that (loosely) said... (I've since lost the emailed speech in some pc crash, so maybe our Aussie friend's can chime in) ...
"This is our country, we will respect your cultures and religions, but you must respect ours first. Basically, if you don't like it here, the way it is, another freedom we have -- is the right to leave." lol...
I guess people get what they deserve. we will elect a new minority govt on tuesday, and will acomplish nothing. there is no way to effect change, even if that were a goal of a govt with a minority.
yes, english would be nice. I read that criminals in the states (and here too) have the right to have their trial translated into their own language. OK, shouldnt be much of an issue. then I read that 37 states employ translators for Klingon. WTF? what are the odds that someone who can speak Klingon a) found their way oyut of mommys basement to comit said crime, and b) doesnt speak english also?
Deep Freeze wrote:
All very valid points, HB. I agree with you. I realize it will not happen but it certainly should. I am also against drivers that cannot read the language of the realm. If you live here, speak English (how ever poorly) and read it as well. As for credit, let's just say that I abhor it. I loath it. It is the single most common factor in financial destruction. I should probably stop as I will get on another rant.
Head banger wrote:
Ah, but then we would also need to test peoples knowledge and inteligence for such things as having children, serving on a jury. perhaps also we could give a decent test of thoughts for credit. no, lets not get into credit. or driving, where do these fools get their licences, a crackerjack box? we should periodicaly re test them too.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I have made it a point to remain quiet regarding politics since my return. As we get closer to November, the rhetoric gets worse and facts become blurred by nonsense and pointless argument.
The truly unfortunate fact of the matter is the public at large are the "morons", not the candidiates. The political folks simply do what they do. It is really up to the people to think about what they are doing and cast a vote accordingly. Worse, the majority of the voting public would not know an issue from a tissue and would wipe their collective butts with it ( to borrow loosely from Lou Reed)
It has long been my opinion that NO ONE under thirty should be allowed to vote. (I realize the younger crowd on the Board are lighting the barbeque now to roast me) Quite frankly, EVERYONE should have to pass a civics exam prior to getting a voting card. The public, in general, have NO idea what they are doing, which is why the likes of an Obama or a Hillary get a chance in the first place. There, I said it.
The system is not going to change. The word change has been tossed about all election long, like there is suddenly this revelation among the population, courtesy of some clown campaigning for office, and they all suddenly 'get it' and will forge bravely into a new future. Bah!! Not going to happen. The change is NOT needed in government, it is needed in the public. That is where the problem is and will continue to be.
Edited at: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:01:17 AM
[WhiskeyWoman] Monday, October 13, 2008 9:36:26 AM
Good Morning everyone!
Imagine, people getting tested before having kidz, or serving on a jury? They'd be no kids and a back-log in the courts! lol...
"Since light travels faster than sound, people appear bright until you hear them speak."(Don't know who said that, aside from my Grandpa... but I always liked that one.)
All I know is, I *don't* want a carbon-tax imposed on us in this country... it is so very wrong.
And, I am just hoping that those to the south of us can vote smarter this time... Obviously, things aren't working the way they should be under their current leadership, such as it is.
Ah, but then we would also need to test peoples knowledge and inteligence for such things as having children, serving on a jury. perhaps also we could give a decent test of thoughts for credit. no, lets not get into credit. or driving, where do these fools get their licences, a crackerjack box? we should periodicaly re test them too.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I have made it a point to remain quiet regarding politics since my return. As we get closer to November, the rhetoric gets worse and facts become blurred by nonsense and pointless argument.
The truly unfortunate fact of the matter is the public at large are the "morons", not the candidiates. The political folks simply do what they do. It is really up to the people to think about what they are doing and cast a vote accordingly. Worse, the majority of the voting public would not know an issue from a tissue and would wipe their collective butts with it ( to borrow loosely from Lou Reed)
It has long been my opinion that NO ONE under thirty should be allowed to vote. (I realize the younger crowd on the Board are lighting the barbeque now to roast me) Quite frankly, EVERYONE should have to pass a civics exam prior to getting a voting card. The public, in general, have NO idea what they are doing, which is why the likes of an Obama or a Hillary get a chance in the first place. There, I said it.
The system is not going to change. The word change has been tossed about all election long, like there is suddenly this revelation among the population, courtesy of some clown campaigning for office, and they all suddenly 'get it' and will forge bravely into a new future. Bah!! Not going to happen. The change is NOT needed in government, it is needed in the public. That is where the problem is and will continue to be.
Edited at: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:01:17 AM
[Head banger] Monday, October 13, 2008 9:21:50 AM
I guess people get what they deserve. we will elect a new minority govt on tuesday, and will acomplish nothing. there is no way to effect change, even if that were a goal of a govt with a minority.
yes, english would be nice. I read that criminals in the states (and here too) have the right to have their trial translated into their own language. OK, shouldnt be much of an issue. then I read that 37 states employ translators for Klingon. WTF? what are the odds that someone who can speak Klingon a) found their way oyut of mommys basement to comit said crime, and b) doesnt speak english also? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Monday, October 13, 2008 9:14:06 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
All very valid points, HB. I agree with you. I realize it will not happen but it certainly should. I am also against drivers that cannot read the language of the realm. If you live here, speak English (how ever poorly) and read it as well. As for credit, let's just say that I abhor it. I loath it. It is the single most common factor in financial destruction. I should probably stop as I will get on another rant.
Head banger wrote:
Ah, but then we would also need to test peoples knowledge and inteligence for such things as having children, serving on a jury. perhaps also we could give a decent test of thoughts for credit. no, lets not get into credit. or driving, where do these fools get their licences, a crackerjack box? we should periodicaly re test them too.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I have made it a point to remain quiet regarding politics since my return. As we get closer to November, the rhetoric gets worse and facts become blurred by nonsense and pointless argument.
The truly unfortunate fact of the matter is the public at large are the "morons", not the candidiates. The political folks simply do what they do. It is really up to the people to think about what they are doing and cast a vote accordingly. Worse, the majority of the voting public would not know an issue from a tissue and would wipe their collective butts with it ( to borrow loosely from Lou Reed)
It has long been my opinion that NO ONE under thirty should be allowed to vote. (I realize the younger crowd on the Board are lighting the barbeque now to roast me) Quite frankly, EVERYONE should have to pass a civics exam prior to getting a voting card. The public, in general, have NO idea what they are doing, which is why the likes of an Obama or a Hillary get a chance in the first place. There, I said it.
The system is not going to change. The word change has been tossed about all election long, like there is suddenly this revelation among the population, courtesy of some clown campaigning for office, and they all suddenly 'get it' and will forge bravely into a new future. Bah!! Not going to happen. The change is NOT needed in government, it is needed in the public. That is where the problem is and will continue to be.
Edited at: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:01:17 AM
[Deep Freeze] Monday, October 13, 2008 9:14:06 AM
All very valid points, HB. I agree with you. I realize it will not happen but it certainly should. I am also against drivers that cannot read the language of the realm. If you live here, speak English (how ever poorly) and read it as well. As for credit, let's just say that I abhor it. I loath it. It is the single most common factor in financial destruction. I should probably stop as I will get on another rant. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Monday, October 13, 2008 8:55:20 AM)
Head banger wrote:
Ah, but then we would also need to test peoples knowledge and inteligence for such things as having children, serving on a jury. perhaps also we could give a decent test of thoughts for credit. no, lets not get into credit. or driving, where do these fools get their licences, a crackerjack box? we should periodicaly re test them too.
Deep Freeze wrote:
I have made it a point to remain quiet regarding politics since my return. As we get closer to November, the rhetoric gets worse and facts become blurred by nonsense and pointless argument.
The truly unfortunate fact of the matter is the public at large are the "morons", not the candidiates. The political folks simply do what they do. It is really up to the people to think about what they are doing and cast a vote accordingly. Worse, the majority of the voting public would not know an issue from a tissue and would wipe their collective butts with it ( to borrow loosely from Lou Reed)
It has long been my opinion that NO ONE under thirty should be allowed to vote. (I realize the younger crowd on the Board are lighting the barbeque now to roast me) Quite frankly, EVERYONE should have to pass a civics exam prior to getting a voting card. The public, in general, have NO idea what they are doing, which is why the likes of an Obama or a Hillary get a chance in the first place. There, I said it.
The system is not going to change. The word change has been tossed about all election long, like there is suddenly this revelation among the population, courtesy of some clown campaigning for office, and they all suddenly 'get it' and will forge bravely into a new future. Bah!! Not going to happen. The change is NOT needed in government, it is needed in the public. That is where the problem is and will continue to be.
Edited at: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:01:17 AM
[Head banger] Monday, October 13, 2008 8:55:20 AM
Ah, but then we would also need to test peoples knowledge and inteligence for such things as having children, serving on a jury. perhaps also we could give a decent test of thoughts for credit. no, lets not get into credit. or driving, where do these fools get their licences, a crackerjack box? we should periodicaly re test them too.
I have made it a point to remain quiet regarding politics since my return. As we get closer to November, the rhetoric gets worse and facts become blurred by nonsense and pointless argument.
The truly unfortunate fact of the matter is the public at large are the "morons", not the candidiates. The political folks simply do what they do. It is really up to the people to think about what they are doing and cast a vote accordingly. Worse, the majority of the voting public would not know an issue from a tissue and would wipe their collective butts with it ( to borrow loosely from Lou Reed)
It has long been my opinion that NO ONE under thirty should be allowed to vote. (I realize the younger crowd on the Board are lighting the barbeque now to roast me) Quite frankly, EVERYONE should have to pass a civics exam prior to getting a voting card. The public, in general, have NO idea what they are doing, which is why the likes of an Obama or a Hillary get a chance in the first place. There, I said it.
The system is not going to change. The word change has been tossed about all election long, like there is suddenly this revelation among the population, courtesy of some clown campaigning for office, and they all suddenly 'get it' and will forge bravely into a new future. Bah!! Not going to happen. The change is NOT needed in government, it is needed in the public. That is where the problem is and will continue to be.
Edited at: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:01:17 AM
[Deep Freeze] Monday, October 13, 2008 7:59:24 AM
I have made it a point to remain quiet regarding politics since my return. As we get closer to November, the rhetoric gets worse and facts become blurred by nonsense and pointless argument.
The truly unfortunate fact of the matter is the public at large are the "morons", not the candidiates. The political folks simply do what they do. It is really up to the people to think about what they are doing and cast a vote accordingly. Worse, the majority of the voting public would not know an issue from a tissue and would wipe their collective butts with it ( to borrow loosely from Lou Reed)
It has long been my opinion that NO ONE under thirty should be allowed to vote. (I realize the younger crowd on the Board are lighting the barbeque now to roast me) Quite frankly, EVERYONE should have to pass a civics exam prior to getting a voting card. The public, in general, have NO idea what they are doing, which is why the likes of an Obama or a Hillary get a chance in the first place. There, I said it.
The system is not going to change. The word change has been tossed about all election long, like there is suddenly this revelation among the population, courtesy of some clown campaigning for office, and they all suddenly 'get it' and will forge bravely into a new future. Bah!! Not going to happen. The change is NOT needed in government, it is needed in the public. That is where the problem is and will continue to be.
Edited at: Monday, October 13, 2008 8:01:17 AM
[Soylentgreen4u] Sunday, October 12, 2008 9:58:16 PM
"NOW JUST WHAT THE HELL IS THAT SUPPOSED TO MEAN?"...(OMG I THOUGHT I WOULD NEVER SAY THAT)........WHYYYYYYYYYYYY OHHHHH WHYYYYYY MUST YOU BE SOOOOOOO GODDAMN MEAN TO ME?!!!!!!..... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by MG_Metalgoddess from Sunday, October 12, 2008 9:34:03 PM)
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
I must now agree with SOY.. ( OMG i thought i would never say that)
Now living in Canada I enjoy not having to deal with the day to riddles of these selfish people and thier lives, that are in politics in the USA.. Its to bad that they have choosen two DOLTS.. to have to plaster on television to decide who is going to run that crumbling country,
Iam sorry but sean Hannity has more secrets to hide than Obama or Mcain.. He twists facts, and only presents half of the stories, leaving out almost all of the real facts.. that of which can be found on any goverment website..
I feel sorry for the USA.. Its too bad that people listen to these talking heads to make thier political decsions for them.. instead of listening to thier own hearts. and to do what is right by family and real life values.
thats it..
end of fucking list!
Healer wrote:
Mark your calendars. This will probably stir the pot….
IS GOING TO AIR A VERY IMPORTANT DOCUMENTARY ABOUT BARACK OBAMA,
SUNDAY NIGHT AT 9:00 PM.
HE STATED ON THE AIR THIS EVENING THAT NO ONE IN THE NEWS MEDIA WAS WILLING TO DO THIS.
HANNITY IS GOING BACK TO OBAMA'S EARLIER DAYS, SHOWING EVEN THEN HIS TIES TO RADICAL PROFESSORS, FRIENDS, SPIRITUAL ADVISERS, Etc.,
HE STATED THIS EVENING THAT HE WILL SHOW IN DETAIL HIS TIES TO REV. WRIGHT FOR 20+ YRS (which we all know) HOW HE WAS PARTICIPATING WITH THIS MAN, AND NOT FOR THE REASONS HE STATES!
HE HAS UNCOVERED MORE OF OBAMA'S RADICAL LEADERS AND WE WILL SEE THINGS THAT NO ONE IN THE MEDIA IS WILLING TO PUT OUT THERE.
THIS WILL BE A NIGHT THAT YOU WILL KNOW MORE ABOUT OBAMA THAN EVER BEFORE.
HANNITY IS VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT THIS PROGRAM AND ASKED THAT EVERYONE PLEASE, PLEASE WATCH~~
SUNDAY NIGHT, 9 PM.
HANNITY IS DETERMINED THIS INFORMATION BE PUT OUT THERE BECAUSE AS AMERICAN'S,
WE STILL DO NOT KNOW ABOUT OBAMA!!
WAKE UP AMERICA !!
THIS IS SERIOUS,
EVERYONE. I KNOW MOST OF YOU WATCH FOX NEWS, AND YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE VOTING FOR,
BUT IF YOU CAN,
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
THIS IS CRITICAL FOR OUR COUNTRY.
MY PRAYER IS THAT WE, ALONG WITH SEAN HANNITY, WILL REACH SOMEONE/ANYONE BEFORE NOV. 4th.
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Sunday, October 12, 2008 9:34:03 PM
I must now agree with SOY.. ( OMG i thought i would never say that)
Now living in Canada I enjoy not having to deal with the day to riddles of these selfish people and thier lives, that are in politics in the USA.. Its to bad that they have choosen two DOLTS.. to have to plaster on television to decide who is going to run that crumbling country,
Iam sorry but sean Hannity has more secrets to hide than Obama or Mcain.. He twists facts, and only presents half of the stories, leaving out almost all of the real facts.. that of which can be found on any goverment website..
I feel sorry for the USA.. Its too bad that people listen to these talking heads to make thier political decsions for them.. instead of listening to thier own hearts. and to do what is right by family and real life values.
IS GOING TO AIR A VERY IMPORTANT DOCUMENTARY ABOUT BARACK OBAMA,
SUNDAY NIGHT AT 9:00 PM.
HE STATED ON THE AIR THIS EVENING THAT NO ONE IN THE NEWS MEDIA WAS WILLING TO DO THIS.
HANNITY IS GOING BACK TO OBAMA'S EARLIER DAYS, SHOWING EVEN THEN HIS TIES TO RADICAL PROFESSORS, FRIENDS, SPIRITUAL ADVISERS, Etc.,
HE STATED THIS EVENING THAT HE WILL SHOW IN DETAIL HIS TIES TO REV. WRIGHT FOR 20+ YRS (which we all know) HOW HE WAS PARTICIPATING WITH THIS MAN, AND NOT FOR THE REASONS HE STATES!
HE HAS UNCOVERED MORE OF OBAMA'S RADICAL LEADERS AND WE WILL SEE THINGS THAT NO ONE IN THE MEDIA IS WILLING TO PUT OUT THERE.
THIS WILL BE A NIGHT THAT YOU WILL KNOW MORE ABOUT OBAMA THAN EVER BEFORE.
HANNITY IS VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT THIS PROGRAM AND ASKED THAT EVERYONE PLEASE, PLEASE WATCH~~
SUNDAY NIGHT, 9 PM.
HANNITY IS DETERMINED THIS INFORMATION BE PUT OUT THERE BECAUSE AS AMERICAN'S,
WE STILL DO NOT KNOW ABOUT OBAMA!!
WAKE UP AMERICA !!
THIS IS SERIOUS,
EVERYONE. I KNOW MOST OF YOU WATCH FOX NEWS, AND YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE VOTING FOR,
BUT IF YOU CAN,
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
THIS IS CRITICAL FOR OUR COUNTRY.
MY PRAYER IS THAT WE, ALONG WITH SEAN HANNITY, WILL REACH SOMEONE/ANYONE BEFORE NOV. 4th.
[Soylentgreen4u] Sunday, October 12, 2008 6:39:56 PM
CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG,BUT ISN'T "FOX" A REPUBLICAN NETWORK ANYWAY?...SO THIS KIND OF "STUFF" IS TO BE EXPECTED...THIS TUESDAY WE MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE A NEW PRIME MINISTER,BUT I'LL TELL YA',OUR POLITICS MAY BE BORING TO MOST OUTSIDE OBSERVERS,BUT I'M SOOOOOOOO GLAD WE DON'T GET THE CRAP AND THEATRICS OUR NEIGHBORS TO THE SOUTH GET...IT'S 2008 AND WE STILL HAVE ABSOLUTE MORONS WHO WOULD NEVER VOTE FOR SOMEONE DUE TO THE COLOUR OF HIS/HER SKIN! ...USUALLY THE WORST WE GET UP HERE IS THE CANDIDATES INSINUATING OR CALLING EACH OTHER LIARS...WHAT A RELIEF.
BILL O'REILLY....THERE'S A FINE EXAMPLE OF A NEWS PERSON,IF THERE EVER WAS ONE... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Healer from Sunday, October 12, 2008 6:12:22 PM)
Healer wrote:
Mark your calendars. This will probably stir the pot….
IS GOING TO AIR A VERY IMPORTANT DOCUMENTARY ABOUT BARACK OBAMA,
SUNDAY NIGHT AT 9:00 PM.
HE STATED ON THE AIR THIS EVENING THAT NO ONE IN THE NEWS MEDIA WAS WILLING TO DO THIS.
HANNITY IS GOING BACK TO OBAMA'S EARLIER DAYS, SHOWING EVEN THEN HIS TIES TO RADICAL PROFESSORS, FRIENDS, SPIRITUAL ADVISERS, Etc.,
HE STATED THIS EVENING THAT HE WILL SHOW IN DETAIL HIS TIES TO REV. WRIGHT FOR 20+ YRS (which we all know) HOW HE WAS PARTICIPATING WITH THIS MAN, AND NOT FOR THE REASONS HE STATES!
HE HAS UNCOVERED MORE OF OBAMA'S RADICAL LEADERS AND WE WILL SEE THINGS THAT NO ONE IN THE MEDIA IS WILLING TO PUT OUT THERE.
THIS WILL BE A NIGHT THAT YOU WILL KNOW MORE ABOUT OBAMA THAN EVER BEFORE.
HANNITY IS VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT THIS PROGRAM AND ASKED THAT EVERYONE PLEASE, PLEASE WATCH~~
SUNDAY NIGHT, 9 PM.
HANNITY IS DETERMINED THIS INFORMATION BE PUT OUT THERE BECAUSE AS AMERICAN'S,
WE STILL DO NOT KNOW ABOUT OBAMA!!
WAKE UP AMERICA !!
THIS IS SERIOUS,
EVERYONE. I KNOW MOST OF YOU WATCH FOX NEWS, AND YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE VOTING FOR,
BUT IF YOU CAN,
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
THIS IS CRITICAL FOR OUR COUNTRY.
MY PRAYER IS THAT WE, ALONG WITH SEAN HANNITY, WILL REACH SOMEONE/ANYONE BEFORE NOV. 4th.
[Healer] Sunday, October 12, 2008 6:12:22 PM
Mark your calendars. This will probably stir the pot….
IS GOING TO AIR A VERY IMPORTANT DOCUMENTARY ABOUT BARACK OBAMA,
SUNDAY NIGHT AT 9:00 PM.
HE STATED ON THE AIR THIS EVENING THAT NO ONE IN THE NEWS MEDIA WAS WILLING TO DO THIS.
HANNITY IS GOING BACK TO OBAMA'S EARLIER DAYS, SHOWING EVEN THEN HIS TIES TO RADICAL PROFESSORS, FRIENDS, SPIRITUAL ADVISERS, Etc.,
HE STATED THIS EVENING THAT HE WILL SHOW IN DETAIL HIS TIES TO REV. WRIGHT FOR 20+ YRS (which we all know) HOW HE WAS PARTICIPATING WITH THIS MAN, AND NOT FOR THE REASONS HE STATES!
HE HAS UNCOVERED MORE OF OBAMA'S RADICAL LEADERS AND WE WILL SEE THINGS THAT NO ONE IN THE MEDIA IS WILLING TO PUT OUT THERE.
THIS WILL BE A NIGHT THAT YOU WILL KNOW MORE ABOUT OBAMA THAN EVER BEFORE.
HANNITY IS VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT THIS PROGRAM AND ASKED THAT EVERYONE PLEASE, PLEASE WATCH~~
SUNDAY NIGHT, 9 PM.
HANNITY IS DETERMINED THIS INFORMATION BE PUT OUT THERE BECAUSE AS AMERICAN'S,
WE STILL DO NOT KNOW ABOUT OBAMA!!
WAKE UP AMERICA !!
THIS IS SERIOUS,
EVERYONE. I KNOW MOST OF YOU WATCH FOX NEWS, AND YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE VOTING FOR,
BUT IF YOU CAN,
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
THIS IS CRITICAL FOR OUR COUNTRY.
MY PRAYER IS THAT WE, ALONG WITH SEAN HANNITY, WILL REACH SOMEONE/ANYONE BEFORE NOV. 4th.
[Deep Freeze] Friday, October 10, 2008 6:45:38 AM
My dear, I am truly sorry for what you had to endure. Anyone that looks through my posts of years gone by will clearly see that I had always stood up and supported Darryn, even when he was at war with another dear friend of mine, JD. I even took the time to go into private e-mail with BOTH of them in an attempt to get two old friends to make amends. IT WAS FUTILE.
The Darryn Hellofs I knew was a mature, caring, successful businessman and loving husband and friend. He was intelligent and, though he and I did NOT see eye to eye on many things, I called him friend. I cannot tell you how much it hurts to think that he has fallen so far and become such a person. He was a VERY important person here on JP.com back in the early years, and even helped me when I first came here and made a fool of myself by saying some very inappropriate things. He was a good man. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by MEDALGODDESS from Thursday, October 09, 2008 6:05:26 PM)
MEDALGODDESS wrote:
Unforunatley.. I have only a few things to say on this matter.. Darryn, is not the same person to all.. And he likes to screw around out here to get a rise out of people.. He has assumed at least 6 different identities that I know of.. He pretends to be someone else and talks about him self... To see what other people have to say about him..
The bottom line is people change.. Around the time I was having my problems with MR winnipeg warrior.. someone came out here under a presummed identiy of myself, and apparently said some things to other members on the board, which in turn the they thought it was coming from me.. Hence one of the reasons I did not go to Vegas.. I feel its very immature of people to do this to other people Hence the reason I dont come out here that much any more.. If I wanted to deal with 2 year olds I would have one............ As far as Iam concerned he has lost all respect with many members .. to bad he cant be banned from here.. What was once a nice person has turned into a menace.
I see things in a different light, I could have been friends with Darryn , I thought we could have meet up b-4 the show.
But do to his Immature nature and the way he turned like someone with a split personality.. I will never let my guard down again..
Hugs to all those who have stood by mee.. I really appreciate youre friendship..
Thanks MG..
Deep Freeze wrote:
B.S. is clearly an understatement! IF it really is Darryn, it is absolutely ridiculous for a middle aged man of his stature to act in such a childish manner. I say IF because I do not know with certainty that it is Darryn who is doing this. My experiences with him have been dignified and honorable. I just cannot imagine what would possess a grown man to act this way...
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Thursday, October 09, 2008 6:05:26 PM
Unforunatley.. I have only a few things to say on this matter.. Darryn, is not the same person to all.. And he likes to screw around out here to get a rise out of people.. He has assumed at least 6 different identities that I know of.. He pretends to be someone else and talks about him self... To see what other people have to say about him..
The bottom line is people change.. Around the time I was having my problems with MR winnipeg warrior.. someone came out here under a presummed identiy of myself, and apparently said some things to other members on the board, which in turn the they thought it was coming from me.. Hence one of the reasons I did not go to Vegas.. I feel its very immature of people to do this to other people Hence the reason I dont come out here that much any more.. If I wanted to deal with 2 year olds I would have one............ As far as Iam concerned he has lost all respect with many members .. to bad he cant be banned from here.. What was once a nice person has turned into a menace.
I see things in a different light, I could have been friends with Darryn , I thought we could have meet up b-4 the show.
But do to his Immature nature and the way he turned like someone with a split personality.. I will never let my guard down again..
Hugs to all those who have stood by mee.. I really appreciate youre friendship..
B.S. is clearly an understatement! IF it really is Darryn, it is absolutely ridiculous for a middle aged man of his stature to act in such a childish manner. I say IF because I do not know with certainty that it is Darryn who is doing this. My experiences with him have been dignified and honorable. I just cannot imagine what would possess a grown man to act this way...
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, October 09, 2008 4:39:44 PM
B.S. is clearly an understatement! IF it really is Darryn, it is absolutely ridiculous for a middle aged man of his stature to act in such a childish manner. I say IF because I do not know with certainty that it is Darryn who is doing this. My experiences with him have been dignified and honorable. I just cannot imagine what would possess a grown man to act this way...
[Head banger] Thursday, October 09, 2008 4:24:31 PM
well, some time ago, "someone" took a few pokes at JD, and then sugested that they would get his name in lights at the home page, lo and behold the name was changed from WW to JD....
strange bullshit.] [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Thursday, October 09, 2008 7:55:53 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
By the by, my mind is not what it once was but I believe this Thread was originally created by Darryn (Winnepeg Warrior), was it not? Why has he begun using a name similar to JD's??? Have I missed something during my absence????
Edited at: Thursday, October 09, 2008 8:05:58 AM Edited at: Thursday, October 09, 2008 8:06:58 AM
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, October 09, 2008 7:55:53 AM
By the by, my mind is not what it once was but I believe this Thread was originally created by Darryn (Winnepeg Warrior), was it not? Why has he begun using a name similar to JD's??? Have I missed something during my absence????
Edited at: Thursday, October 09, 2008 8:05:58 AM Edited at: Thursday, October 09, 2008 8:06:58 AM
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, October 09, 2008 7:55:52 AM
WOW BS!! You appear to be very well-read on the subject of your country's government! That is refreshing. I wish I knew half as much about mine!! Well done, my friend. As we here in the US endure yet another election season, I can only tell you that I grow more and more weary of it all. The word "change" seems to be the favorite this year and yet, I see so very little of it from either candidate. It is little wonder why there are more and more cynics! Anyway, great to see you again BS. I have missed you.
[ron h] Thursday, October 09, 2008 3:48:51 AM
Unfortunately...even for a democratic society...there's not a whole hell of a lot we can do about it...imho, it's all about who can raise more campaign funds...unless you're 1 of the big 2, there's no competing!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by BLOOD SUCKER Esquire from Monday, October 06, 2008 12:14:22 PM)
BLOOD SUCKER Esquire wrote:
The biggest challenge with the political system in the USA is the fact that you only have two major parties. Democratic and Republican. It only gives you one option when you're fed up and sick and tired of one or the other. So it's not essentially that you're voting for one party at election time. It's more of the scenario where you're voting against the other party. Which makes no sense. Because it's a yo-yo cycle every four or eight years. Republican, Democrat, Republic, Democrat. Back and forth. Over and over. And the people of your country 'settle' for this?
a. Hammerstein
[BLOOD SUCKER Esquire] Wednesday, October 08, 2008 12:37:58 PM
We are hopeful that William reverses this trend and brings some civility and decorum to the political process. One can only hope that Charles is bypassed as we all suspect he will be.
Hmmm... wondering if that's where the phrase "royally screwed" comes from...
BLOOD SUCKER Esquire wrote:
The Monarchy is the Head of State. The PM is the Head of Government. The House of Lords, which acts and works with the Monarchy, is an advisory council.....and has superior power over the Head. We have a multi-party system that has two major parties. The Conservatives and the Labour Party. But at the end of the day.....it's still Lizzy that calls all the shots!
a. Hammerstein
[WhiskeyWoman] Wednesday, October 08, 2008 10:04:29 AM
Hmmm... wondering if that's where the phrase "royally screwed" comes from...
The Monarchy is the Head of State. The PM is the Head of Government. The House of Lords, which acts and works with the Monarchy, is an advisory council.....and has superior power over the Head. We have a multi-party system that has two major parties. The Conservatives and the Labour Party. But at the end of the day.....it's still Lizzy that calls all the shots!
a. Hammerstein
[BLOOD SUCKER Esquire] Tuesday, October 07, 2008 12:10:13 PM
The Monarchy is the Head of State. The PM is the Head of Government. The House of Lords, which acts and works with the Monarchy, is an advisory council.....and has superior power over the Head. We have a multi-party system that has two major parties. The Conservatives and the Labour Party. But at the end of the day.....it's still Lizzy that calls all the shots!
a. Hammerstein
[WhiskeyWoman] Monday, October 06, 2008 12:26:40 PM
Hi Bloodsucker,
You pose a good point, for sure. That's gotta suck having only two evils to pick from...
Here in Canada, we have the Green Party, PC's, Liberals, NDP, Bloc Quebecois... AND the Marijuana Party (although, for some strange reason they weren't invited to the national debate -- although, maybe they were but were too busy contemplating just going! ... lol.)
Even with "all" the eligible choices, there's still nobody good to vote for!
What kind of set-up you folks got over there in the UK? How many parties run in your elections?
The biggest challenge with the political system in the USA is the fact that you only have two major parties. Democratic and Republican. It only gives you one option when you're fed up and sick and tired of one or the other. So it's not essentially that you're voting for one party at election time. It's more of the scenario where you're voting against the other party. Which makes no sense. Because it's a yo-yo cycle every four or eight years. Republican, Democrat, Republic, Democrat. Back and forth. Over and over. And the people of your country 'settle' for this?
a. Hammerstein
Edited at: Monday, October 06, 2008 12:28:07 PM
[BLOOD SUCKER Esquire] Monday, October 06, 2008 12:14:22 PM
The biggest challenge with the political system in the USA is the fact that you only have two major parties. Democratic and Republican. It only gives you one option when you're fed up and sick and tired of one or the other. So it's not essentially that you're voting for one party at election time. It's more of the scenario where you're voting against the other party. Which makes no sense. Because it's a yo-yo cycle every four or eight years. Republican, Democrat, Republic, Democrat. Back and forth. Over and over. And the people of your country 'settle' for this?
a. Hammerstein
[Soylentgreen4u] Monday, October 06, 2008 11:22:22 AM
HELLO WHISKEY...THE DEBATE I'M GOING TO IS JUST OUR LOCAL ONE FOR THE SURROUNDING AREA,NOT THE LEADERS,JUST THE M.P.'S...BUT I FEEL LIKE BEING AMUSED,SO
I'LL PROBABLY GO...WHY NOT?
Hey Soy,
No, I don't think we have talked directly yet, so ... "Hi! from the prairies..."
While I am grateful we don't have to deal with what seems like years for an election to take place like, um ... it does in a country to the south that shall go unnamed ... I would like a bit more time to make a choice! A few weeks for such an important decision just doesn't seem like enough time.
Not to mention that, with a bit more time, we could actually start some of that relevant soap-opera stuff & gossip going on! Might even make it interesting for a change...
So you are actually *going* to the debate? Now that's dedication. You're probably the most informed loonie in the country! (Is it on t.v....? Just curious which of my favourite programs are being pre-empted -- lol!)
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
HI WHISKEY ...DON'T THINK WE'VE YAKKED BEFORE,HOPE ALL IS WELL OUT WEST...YES ALBERTA HAS BEEN CONSERVATIVE COUNTRY FOR QUITE SOME TIME AND I'M SURE THAT WON'T CHANGE...MY CHOICE HAS BEEN MADE,BUT IM GONNA GO TO THE FINAL DEBATE HERE ANYWAY,JUST TO CHECK THINGS OUT....ONE GOOD THING ABOUT OUR COUNTRY (AND THERE ARE A GREAT MANY) IS AT LEAST WE DON'T HAVE TO DISCUSS IT ON TV FOR YEARS AND YEARS PRIOR TO THE VOTE LIKE OUR GOOD FRIENDS TO THE SOUTH.
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Okay Soy ... just 'coz you said so -- the 14th is marked on the calendar to go blindfolded and pick a name. Haven't a clue what to do in this one!
Don't like any of them. Alberta gets sewn up no matter what we do to try and change things! I just want to get rid of Alberta's premier 'Stinkypatch'... There's no-one like King Ralph, lol! (Quoting Message by Soylentgreen4u from Sunday, October 05, 2008 10:42:13 PM)
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
VOTING DAY COMING UP HERE IN CANADA,OCT.14...BUT I THINK I'M GONNA DROP MINE IN TOMORROW AT THE ADVANCE POLLING STATION DUE TO THE FACT I'LL BE AWAY ON THE 14th...WILL WE HAVE A NEW PRIME MINISTER?..WILL THERE BE A MAJORITY GOV. OR A MINORITY?...HERE'S HOPING ALL CANADIANS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE,GET OUT THERE AND HAVE THEIR SAY! ...THEN,JUST TO BE AMUSED,THINK I'LL TAKE IN THE LAST PUBLIC DEBATE HERE IN MY CITY TOMORROW NIGHT AND WATCH THE ANTAGONISTS GO AT EACH OTHER! ............SHOULD BE A HOOT.
Edited at: Sunday, October 05, 2008 11:56:12 PM
[WhiskeyWoman] Monday, October 06, 2008 10:03:03 AM
Hey Soy,
No, I don't think we have talked directly yet, so ... "Hi! from the prairies..."
While I am grateful we don't have to deal with what seems like years for an election to take place like, um ... it does in a country to the south that shall go unnamed ... I would like a bit more time to make a choice! A few weeks for such an important decision just doesn't seem like enough time.
Not to mention that, with a bit more time, we could actually start some of that relevant soap-opera stuff & gossip going on! Might even make it interesting for a change...
So you are actually *going* to the debate? Now that's dedication. You're probably the most informed loonie in the country! (Is it on t.v....? Just curious which of my favourite programs are being pre-empted -- lol!) [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Soylentgreen4u from Sunday, October 05, 2008 11:59:13 PM)
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
HI WHISKEY ...DON'T THINK WE'VE YAKKED BEFORE,HOPE ALL IS WELL OUT WEST...YES ALBERTA HAS BEEN CONSERVATIVE COUNTRY FOR QUITE SOME TIME AND I'M SURE THAT WON'T CHANGE...MY CHOICE HAS BEEN MADE,BUT IM GONNA GO TO THE FINAL DEBATE HERE ANYWAY,JUST TO CHECK THINGS OUT....ONE GOOD THING ABOUT OUR COUNTRY (AND THERE ARE A GREAT MANY) IS AT LEAST WE DON'T HAVE TO DISCUSS IT ON TV FOR YEARS AND YEARS PRIOR TO THE VOTE LIKE OUR GOOD FRIENDS TO THE SOUTH.
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Okay Soy ... just 'coz you said so -- the 14th is marked on the calendar to go blindfolded and pick a name. Haven't a clue what to do in this one!
Don't like any of them. Alberta gets sewn up no matter what we do to try and change things! I just want to get rid of Alberta's premier 'Stinkypatch'... There's no-one like King Ralph, lol! (Quoting Message by Soylentgreen4u from Sunday, October 05, 2008 10:42:13 PM)
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
VOTING DAY COMING UP HERE IN CANADA,OCT.14...BUT I THINK I'M GONNA DROP MINE IN TOMORROW AT THE ADVANCE POLLING STATION DUE TO THE FACT I'LL BE AWAY ON THE 14th...WILL WE HAVE A NEW PRIME MINISTER?..WILL THERE BE A MAJORITY GOV. OR A MINORITY?...HERE'S HOPING ALL CANADIANS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE,GET OUT THERE AND HAVE THEIR SAY! ...THEN,JUST TO BE AMUSED,THINK I'LL TAKE IN THE LAST PUBLIC DEBATE HERE IN MY CITY TOMORROW NIGHT AND WATCH THE ANTAGONISTS GO AT EACH OTHER! ............SHOULD BE A HOOT.
Edited at: Sunday, October 05, 2008 11:56:12 PM
[Head banger] Monday, October 06, 2008 7:29:12 AM
well, given the frequency of our elections of late, how could we? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Soylentgreen4u from Sunday, October 05, 2008 11:59:13 PM)
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
HI WHISKEY ...DON'T THINK WE'VE YAKKED BEFORE,HOPE ALL IS WELL OUT WEST...YES ALBERTA HAS BEEN CONSERVATIVE COUNTRY FOR QUITE SOME TIME AND I'M SURE THAT WON'T CHANGE...MY CHOICE HAS BEEN MADE,BUT IM GONNA GO TO THE FINAL DEBATE HERE ANYWAY,JUST TO CHECK THINGS OUT....ONE GOOD THING ABOUT OUR COUNTRY (AND THERE ARE A GREAT MANY) IS AT LEAST WE DON'T HAVE TO DISCUSS IT ON TV FOR YEARS AND YEARS PRIOR TO THE VOTE LIKE OUR GOOD FRIENDS TO THE SOUTH.
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Okay Soy ... just 'coz you said so -- the 14th is marked on the calendar to go blindfolded and pick a name. Haven't a clue what to do in this one!
Don't like any of them. Alberta gets sewn up no matter what we do to try and change things! I just want to get rid of Alberta's premier 'Stinkypatch'... There's no-one like King Ralph, lol! (Quoting Message by Soylentgreen4u from Sunday, October 05, 2008 10:42:13 PM)
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
VOTING DAY COMING UP HERE IN CANADA,OCT.14...BUT I THINK I'M GONNA DROP MINE IN TOMORROW AT THE ADVANCE POLLING STATION DUE TO THE FACT I'LL BE AWAY ON THE 14th...WILL WE HAVE A NEW PRIME MINISTER?..WILL THERE BE A MAJORITY GOV. OR A MINORITY?...HERE'S HOPING ALL CANADIANS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE,GET OUT THERE AND HAVE THEIR SAY! ...THEN,JUST TO BE AMUSED,THINK I'LL TAKE IN THE LAST PUBLIC DEBATE HERE IN MY CITY TOMORROW NIGHT AND WATCH THE ANTAGONISTS GO AT EACH OTHER! ............SHOULD BE A HOOT.
Edited at: Sunday, October 05, 2008 11:56:12 PM
[Soylentgreen4u] Sunday, October 05, 2008 11:59:13 PM
HI WHISKEY ...DON'T THINK WE'VE YAKKED BEFORE,HOPE ALL IS WELL OUT WEST...YES ALBERTA HAS BEEN CONSERVATIVE COUNTRY FOR QUITE SOME TIME AND I'M SURE THAT WON'T CHANGE...MY CHOICE HAS BEEN MADE,BUT IM GONNA GO TO THE FINAL DEBATE HERE ANYWAY,JUST TO CHECK THINGS OUT....ONE GOOD THING ABOUT OUR COUNTRY (AND THERE ARE A GREAT MANY) IS AT LEAST WE DON'T HAVE TO DISCUSS IT ON TV FOR YEARS AND YEARS PRIOR TO THE VOTE LIKE OUR GOOD FRIENDS TO THE SOUTH. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by WhiskeyWoman from Sunday, October 05, 2008 11:49:53 PM)
WhiskeyWoman wrote:
Okay Soy ... just 'coz you said so -- the 14th is marked on the calendar to go blindfolded and pick a name. Haven't a clue what to do in this one!
Don't like any of them. Alberta gets sewn up no matter what we do to try and change things! I just want to get rid of Alberta's premier 'Stinkypatch'... There's no-one like King Ralph, lol! (Quoting Message by Soylentgreen4u from Sunday, October 05, 2008 10:42:13 PM)
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
VOTING DAY COMING UP HERE IN CANADA,OCT.14...BUT I THINK I'M GONNA DROP MINE IN TOMORROW AT THE ADVANCE POLLING STATION DUE TO THE FACT I'LL BE AWAY ON THE 14th...WILL WE HAVE A NEW PRIME MINISTER?..WILL THERE BE A MAJORITY GOV. OR A MINORITY?...HERE'S HOPING ALL CANADIANS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE,GET OUT THERE AND HAVE THEIR SAY! ...THEN,JUST TO BE AMUSED,THINK I'LL TAKE IN THE LAST PUBLIC DEBATE HERE IN MY CITY TOMORROW NIGHT AND WATCH THE ANTAGONISTS GO AT EACH OTHER! ............SHOULD BE A HOOT.
Edited at: Sunday, October 05, 2008 11:56:12 PM
[WhiskeyWoman] Sunday, October 05, 2008 11:49:53 PM
Okay Soy ... just 'coz you said so -- the 14th is marked on the calendar to go blindfolded and pick a name. Haven't a clue what to do in this one!
Don't like any of them. Alberta gets sewn up no matter what we do to try and change things! I just want to get rid of Alberta's premier 'Stinkypatch'... There's no-one like King Ralph, lol! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Soylentgreen4u from Sunday, October 05, 2008 10:42:13 PM)
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
VOTING DAY COMING UP HERE IN CANADA,OCT.14...BUT I THINK I'M GONNA DROP MINE IN TOMORROW AT THE ADVANCE POLLING STATION DUE TO THE FACT I'LL BE AWAY ON THE 14th...WILL WE HAVE A NEW PRIME MINISTER?..WILL THERE BE A MAJORITY GOV. OR A MINORITY?...HERE'S HOPING ALL CANADIANS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE,GET OUT THERE AND HAVE THEIR SAY! ...THEN,JUST TO BE AMUSED,THINK I'LL TAKE IN THE LAST PUBLIC DEBATE HERE IN MY CITY TOMORROW NIGHT AND WATCH THE ANTAGONISTS GO AT EACH OTHER! ............SHOULD BE A HOOT.
Edited at: Sunday, October 05, 2008 11:56:12 PM
[Soylentgreen4u] Sunday, October 05, 2008 10:42:13 PM
VOTING DAY COMING UP HERE IN CANADA,OCT.14...BUT I THINK I'M GONNA DROP MINE IN TOMORROW AT THE ADVANCE POLLING STATION DUE TO THE FACT I'LL BE AWAY ON THE 14th...WILL WE HAVE A NEW PRIME MINISTER?..WILL THERE BE A MAJORITY GOV. OR A MINORITY?...HERE'S HOPING ALL CANADIANS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE,GET OUT THERE AND HAVE THEIR SAY! ...THEN,JUST TO BE AMUSED,THINK I'LL TAKE IN THE LAST PUBLIC DEBATE HERE IN MY CITY TOMORROW NIGHT AND WATCH THE ANTAGONISTS GO AT EACH OTHER! ............SHOULD BE A HOOT.
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Friday, October 03, 2008 2:41:09 PM
LOL shotz........ Better make that 850 billion, and Iam so happy to see that Nascar is going to get thier tax break in the deal as well..... What a fricken joke. GET ER DONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LMAO [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by shotz from Thursday, October 02, 2008 3:52:40 AM)
shotz wrote:
what will 700 billion get you?
[buck foston] Thursday, October 02, 2008 3:52:40 AM
what will 700 billion get you?
[ron h] Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:28:20 AM
PS the medical bills and divorce agreements are NOT related [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:13:26 AM)
ronhartsell wrote:
Thanks for your post, this may (or may not) answer a question I have. At the plant that I work at, I worked with a man who was recently terminated because his documentation was not proper. I don't know when he and his family moved up here (from south of the border), but he had a really nice house and (I kid you not) 8 credit cards to boot. I was born an American, served my country, worked hard, had hic-ups here and there with my credit (mostly because of medical bills and divorce agreements) and have never been fortunate enough to obtain a home loan (no, I am not a minority). Yet someone can live here illegally and get these opportunities? I don't know if one has anything to do with the other, but I am deeply disturbed by this.
Painkiller1990 wrote:
So Who’s really lying about Fannie and Freddie?
Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, said today on the House floor that this whole mess we're in is the Republicans' fault. She blamed George Bush's economic policies for this financial problem we're having. This is important to know, dear reader, because you need to know the truth. You DESERVE to know the truth. And I can honestly say, if this was reversed and the Republicans were really to blame, I'd be sitting home this election.
But this isn't the case.
The mortgage crisis began actually in the Carter Administration. It's the result of liberalism, it truly is. Liberals believe it's unfair for some poor people to not own a home, minorities mainly, even though they clearly cannot afford one. Under Bill Clinton, Washington passed a bill that actually forced lenders to give loans to people who could never pay them back. It was called affordable housing. Lending institutions were giving loans to people, in some instances, without ever verifying their ability to pay it back. Some other instances saw illegal aliens getting loans, I kid you not. Attorney General, Janet Reno, threatened these institutions with legal actions if they failed to comply and give out these bad loans to people who clearly could never make the payments. And mind you, these are lending practices that under normal circumstances would never ever in a million years have taken place if it weren't for the Government. So, you know what this all really was? It was reparations to minorities!
It was affirmative action at it's finest. Pure, 100% liberalism. It all makes sense to me now because I've been saying since the housing market dropped, you can't loan someone money to buy a 300K dollar home when they're only making 30K a year... with no down payment. It common sense, Man!
But it was really the lending practices forced by the Government that caused this. Liberals tried to say it was predatory lending. The evil banking industry taking advantage of the innocent poor. HA! Now we know better.
Fannie and Freddie, under the control and direction of Franklin Raines, bought up all these toxic loans in an effort to give the appearance that Freddie and Fannie had much more value than was the truth. This is why Raines made almost 100 million dollars in bonuses over 7 years at F&F. And as long as F&F kept donating to the Democratic party, the Democrats would keep covering up all the corruption as you are about to watch. That's right, Clinton and the rest of the Democrats tried to solidify their constituency by guaranteeing them loans they could never pay back. In return, they got the votes. The kick backs went to Christopher Dodd, OBAMA, Jamie Gorelick, Barney Frank, Jim Johnson, Chuck Schumer, and a bunch of other Democrats.
George Bush urged Congress to act between 10 to 15 times to regulate this problem, but those attempts died in the halls of Congress. 2004 is when these hearings took place you're going to see, and pay attention... REPUBLICANS, not Democrats, are trying to regulate Fannie and Freddie because it's clearly evident what has been going on. These hearing are the reason why Franklin Raines got the boot, he was corrupt and got busted.
First video, Nancy Pelosi today blaming George Bush's economic policies and Republicans for the troubles in Fannie and Freddie, and the whole financial situation.
Now, here is what happened in 2004 when the hearings were taking place, and Republicans were calling for more regulations in an effort to stop this illegal activity from turning into the exact problems we're now facing. And the Democrats are all saying Fannie and Freddie are just fine, doing a good job even... covering it all up. It's amazing to watch, it truly is.
And like I said a few days ago, this all, in total and in it's entirety, lays at the feet of liberal Democrats. Make no mistake about it, they are responsible.
it.Edited at: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:47:34 PM Edited at: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:49:51 PM
[ron h] Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:13:26 AM
Thanks for your post, this may (or may not) answer a question I have. At the plant that I work at, I worked with a man who was recently terminated because his documentation was not proper. I don't know when he and his family moved up here (from south of the border), but he had a really nice house and (I kid you not) 8 credit cards to boot. I was born an American, served my country, worked hard, had hic-ups here and there with my credit (mostly because of medical bills and divorce agreements) and have never been fortunate enough to obtain a home loan (no, I am not a minority). Yet someone can live here illegally and get these opportunities? I don't know if one has anything to do with the other, but I am deeply disturbed by this.
Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, said today on the House floor that this whole mess we're in is the Republicans' fault. She blamed George Bush's economic policies for this financial problem we're having. This is important to know, dear reader, because you need to know the truth. You DESERVE to know the truth. And I can honestly say, if this was reversed and the Republicans were really to blame, I'd be sitting home this election.
But this isn't the case.
The mortgage crisis began actually in the Carter Administration. It's the result of liberalism, it truly is. Liberals believe it's unfair for some poor people to not own a home, minorities mainly, even though they clearly cannot afford one. Under Bill Clinton, Washington passed a bill that actually forced lenders to give loans to people who could never pay them back. It was called affordable housing. Lending institutions were giving loans to people, in some instances, without ever verifying their ability to pay it back. Some other instances saw illegal aliens getting loans, I kid you not. Attorney General, Janet Reno, threatened these institutions with legal actions if they failed to comply and give out these bad loans to people who clearly could never make the payments. And mind you, these are lending practices that under normal circumstances would never ever in a million years have taken place if it weren't for the Government. So, you know what this all really was? It was reparations to minorities!
It was affirmative action at it's finest. Pure, 100% liberalism. It all makes sense to me now because I've been saying since the housing market dropped, you can't loan someone money to buy a 300K dollar home when they're only making 30K a year... with no down payment. It common sense, Man!
But it was really the lending practices forced by the Government that caused this. Liberals tried to say it was predatory lending. The evil banking industry taking advantage of the innocent poor. HA! Now we know better.
Fannie and Freddie, under the control and direction of Franklin Raines, bought up all these toxic loans in an effort to give the appearance that Freddie and Fannie had much more value than was the truth. This is why Raines made almost 100 million dollars in bonuses over 7 years at F&F. And as long as F&F kept donating to the Democratic party, the Democrats would keep covering up all the corruption as you are about to watch. That's right, Clinton and the rest of the Democrats tried to solidify their constituency by guaranteeing them loans they could never pay back. In return, they got the votes. The kick backs went to Christopher Dodd, OBAMA, Jamie Gorelick, Barney Frank, Jim Johnson, Chuck Schumer, and a bunch of other Democrats.
George Bush urged Congress to act between 10 to 15 times to regulate this problem, but those attempts died in the halls of Congress. 2004 is when these hearings took place you're going to see, and pay attention... REPUBLICANS, not Democrats, are trying to regulate Fannie and Freddie because it's clearly evident what has been going on. These hearing are the reason why Franklin Raines got the boot, he was corrupt and got busted.
First video, Nancy Pelosi today blaming George Bush's economic policies and Republicans for the troubles in Fannie and Freddie, and the whole financial situation.
Now, here is what happened in 2004 when the hearings were taking place, and Republicans were calling for more regulations in an effort to stop this illegal activity from turning into the exact problems we're now facing. And the Democrats are all saying Fannie and Freddie are just fine, doing a good job even... covering it all up. It's amazing to watch, it truly is.
And like I said a few days ago, this all, in total and in it's entirety, lays at the feet of liberal Democrats. Make no mistake about it, they are responsible.
it.Edited at: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:47:34 PM Edited at: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:49:51 PM
[ron h] Thursday, October 02, 2008 12:54:43 AM
That's why I just try to focus on the issues that most directly affect me and my own. Every canidate has it's pluses and miuses. It is a daunting task to filter through all the BS most of the time, so I try to narrow the issues to make it more personal to me and try to focus on that. In my case, it's labor and domestic issues. Yes, I do care about other issues as well, but I'm tired of the home-front playing second fiddles to global affairs. The way I see it, how can we help others if we can't help ourselves. We have way too many domestic problems that need to be addressed and resolved right now, our own issues need to take center stage. All these billions upon billions of dollars being spent outside our borders is literally killing us and future generations to come. We can not solve the worlds problems, and most of the world don't want us to anyway. At what point do we tell some of these other countries to step up and help yourselves? Why do we have to (in some cases) fight our own allies to push our (?) own agenda? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by VICTIM OF METAL from Wednesday, October 01, 2008 5:33:20 PM)
VICTIM OF METAL wrote:
It depends on what channel you watch? If you don't know don't guess! T.V. media in general is to the Left, some programs, alot more to the Left, The View for one. Radio is to the Right, or middle and then some(O'Riley, who's ratings are tanking) But there isn't much for the middle, on t.v.? I'm just given ya a clue, not bashing ya, i know i'm more of a sports guy to. Obama has been interviewed by O'Riely once. Name one or two on the Right that's interviewed him (OBAMA)? Palin has been interviewed by more then 4-5 on the Left news channels Katie Couric twice, Charlie Gibson another, OH YEA THE CRYPT KEEPER,LOL, Larry King. "Let me ask you a tough question, what's your favorite color?" HE'S TO HOLLYWOOD FOR ME (stares as guests). I don't care what hollyweird thinks, yet he thinks we do?
life is not fair. expecting the media to be so is silly.
learn what you can on your own, base your decisions on that, a past record is usualy a good indicator of future performance.
ronhartsell wrote:
Did I say the media was fair? I said it depends on what station (or something to that effect). Each news/ show/program seems to have their own slant depending on who they favor. Is that a fair? Absolutely not. I don't even really watch news programs and never claimed to, and for that very reason, there is no down the middle, only the facts allowed program that I am aware of. If there is, please do tell, then I might watch, but I'd rather watch and root for my Cubs in the playoffs. My points of view are mine and mine alone. I shared them on this board and am willing to discuss and learn (I've posted as such). Closed minded? I'm about as open minded as they come. Hell, I wish there was a third candidate to choose from, but we're stuck with these two, and like every other American I have to choose the one who I think will serve my best interests better than other. Hence, I choose Obama.
VICTIM OF METAL wrote:
I would love to, yet you've already stated that the media is fair to both sides. So i know where you stand on most issues. Debating politics with a closed mind is useless.
ronhartsell wrote:
Franklin Raines? You've got to be kidding me. C'mon VOM. He's nothing in this. He's had no personal contact (with the issue I know you are trying to raise) at all with Obama. He has never given any direct advice to Obama. He is one (of many) individuals that has been contacted one time by someone in his campaign committee, and Raines will tell you that himself. Again, he is nothing in this.
James A Johnson. I know he's been involved with numerous fortune 500 and 1000 companies, and I think he had a settlement of some kind not too long ago (earlier this year or last). He does have quite the reputation from what I understand, and is respected in some sectors. I also know he has made contributions to Obama's campaign. Other than that, I can't say that much about him.
C'mon, clue me in, I know you want to.
VICTIM OF METAL wrote:
Two names, Franklin Raines and James A. Johnson?
[Painkiller1990] Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:39:47 PM
So Who’s really lying about Fannie and Freddie?
Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, said today on the House floor that this whole mess we're in is the Republicans' fault. She blamed George Bush's economic policies for this financial problem we're having. This is important to know, dear reader, because you need to know the truth. You DESERVE to know the truth. And I can honestly say, if this was reversed and the Republicans were really to blame, I'd be sitting home this election.
But this isn't the case.
The mortgage crisis began actually in the Carter Administration. It's the result of liberalism, it truly is. Liberals believe it's unfair for some poor people to not own a home, minorities mainly, even though they clearly cannot afford one. Under Bill Clinton, Washington passed a bill that actually forced lenders to give loans to people who could never pay them back. It was called affordable housing. Lending institutions were giving loans to people, in some instances, without ever verifying their ability to pay it back. Some other instances saw illegal aliens getting loans, I kid you not. Attorney General, Janet Reno, threatened these institutions with legal actions if they failed to comply and give out these bad loans to people who clearly could never make the payments. And mind you, these are lending practices that under normal circumstances would never ever in a million years have taken place if it weren't for the Government. So, you know what this all really was? It was reparations to minorities!
It was affirmative action at it's finest. Pure, 100% liberalism. It all makes sense to me now because I've been saying since the housing market dropped, you can't loan someone money to buy a 300K dollar home when they're only making 30K a year... with no down payment. It common sense, Man!
But it was really the lending practices forced by the Government that caused this. Liberals tried to say it was predatory lending. The evil banking industry taking advantage of the innocent poor. HA! Now we know better.
Fannie and Freddie, under the control and direction of Franklin Raines, bought up all these toxic loans in an effort to give the appearance that Freddie and Fannie had much more value than was the truth. This is why Raines made almost 100 million dollars in bonuses over 7 years at F&F. And as long as F&F kept donating to the Democratic party, the Democrats would keep covering up all the corruption as you are about to watch. That's right, Clinton and the rest of the Democrats tried to solidify their constituency by guaranteeing them loans they could never pay back. In return, they got the votes. The kick backs went to Christopher Dodd, OBAMA, Jamie Gorelick, Barney Frank, Jim Johnson, Chuck Schumer, and a bunch of other Democrats.
George Bush urged Congress to act between 10 to 15 times to regulate this problem, but those attempts died in the halls of Congress. 2004 is when these hearings took place you're going to see, and pay attention... REPUBLICANS, not Democrats, are trying to regulate Fannie and Freddie because it's clearly evident what has been going on. These hearing are the reason why Franklin Raines got the boot, he was corrupt and got busted.
First video, Nancy Pelosi today blaming George Bush's economic policies and Republicans for the troubles in Fannie and Freddie, and the whole financial situation.
Now, here is what happened in 2004 when the hearings were taking place, and Republicans were calling for more regulations in an effort to stop this illegal activity from turning into the exact problems we're now facing. And the Democrats are all saying Fannie and Freddie are just fine, doing a good job even... covering it all up. It's amazing to watch, it truly is.
And like I said a few days ago, this all, in total and in it's entirety, lays at the feet of liberal Democrats. Make no mistake about it, they are responsible.
it.Edited at: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:47:34 PM Edited at: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:49:51 PM
[VICTIM OF METAL] Wednesday, October 01, 2008 5:33:20 PM
It depends on what channel you watch? If you don't know don't guess! T.V. media in general is to the Left, some programs, alot more to the Left, The View for one. Radio is to the Right, or middle and then some(O'Riley, who's ratings are tanking) But there isn't much for the middle, on t.v.? I'm just given ya a clue, not bashing ya, i know i'm more of a sports guy to. Obama has been interviewed by O'Riely once. Name one or two on the Right that's interviewed him (OBAMA)? Palin has been interviewed by more then 4-5 on the Left news channels Katie Couric twice, Charlie Gibson another, OH YEA THE CRYPT KEEPER,LOL, Larry King. "Let me ask you a tough question, what's your favorite color?" HE'S TO HOLLYWOOD FOR ME (stares as guests). I don't care what hollyweird thinks, yet he thinks we do?
[Head banger] Wednesday, October 01, 2008 7:26:49 AM
I dont hold much influence in elections, as I am in managment. I was elected shop steward once, another steward told the business agent I didnt want to do it, so they bounced me, which, whatever. here, diferent from the USA, the stewards and elected members dont make the call, the business agents and employees of the union do. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:42:16 PM)
ronhartsell wrote:
Head Banger, It's sad to hear what happened. I can and will speak only of my experiences. I am close to the end of my 3 year term, and it's the first time I've held a union position. Aside from that, I have been a union member for a total of 12 years. I, like yourself, have witnessed injustices in the workplace such as the one you wrote about. To me, the union's credibility lies with the elected representatives, who's job it is to protect the innocent victims. If you have officers who lack moral conviction and a sense of responsibility and obligation to the workers they represent, then they are the worst types of people there are. I run an honest union. I make no excuses for the violators of workplace conduct. If they (and a few have tried) want to file a DFR (Duty to Fair Representation) charge, so be it. That is not why I do this job or take my responsibilities lightly. It's hard enough having to deal with bad management without dealing with situations like we're discussing here. It is my responsibility, as the Chairman, to co-ordinate the Committee persons (grievers/stewards) and collectively we decide whether to file grievances or not. In the case in your workplace, that injustice had to be a co-ordinated effort by the entire board, and they should have ALL been held accountable, that is why you attend union meetings. The collective group of all the workers is the union, not the elected officers, we are subject to the workforce, that is who we, as officers, answer to. Something like that has not happened in my workplace under my watch, and it never will!!! Hold your officers accountable!!!
Head banger wrote:
sorry, I am late with a reply, got busy and forgot. anyway, if the union was only ever protecting the ones discriminated against, fine and well, but if a union employee harasses a union employee, the company fires the harasser, the union defends them, attacking their own member who was harassed. happened at my work, and the girl who was harassed ended up quiting, and spending some time in treatment, because of the way her union defended her attacker.
ronhartsell wrote:
If there were no bias or clicks or favorites or discrimination or sexual harassment or many, many other things that go on in the workplace then no, there wouldn't be a need. BUT THERE IS!!! Always have been, always will be. If you can put an end to all of that and leave it only up to an individuals' production, then there wouldn't be a need for protection. How many women have been fired for filing a sexual harassment charge? Or even worse, how many women don't file a charge out of fear of being terminated (or worse)?
Head banger wrote:
if your a good worker, why do you need protection? who would fire a good worker?
ronhartsell wrote:
Not true. In the Right to Work states, as the one I live in, employers do not even have to have a reason to terminate an employee. So, no, the worker does not have the right to say what he/she wants, there is no standing up for yourself without the risk of being terminated. How just is that?
BLOOD SUCKER Esquire wrote:
Why does your worker need you to speak for him? Can he not speak for himself through his own work? That's what counts.....the work. We speak of downsizing larger governenments in the betterment of the process. And yet, the unions need to maintain their control over the worker. We complain of the government pulling our strings. And yet allow unions to pull the strings of the employee to slow down progress and upward mobility.
You know what brings a worker to the same level as his employer? Hard work and production. THAT is power.
a. Hammerstein
ronhartsell wrote:
Do we actually read posts before posting. I wrote that I vote based on the candidates past voting record. What did I post that makes you post that the union buys this or tells you to do that. It's nowhere in my postings.
I do what I do in my union because I believe in workers rights, fair representation, and having a say in my working conditions. Unions allow workers to do that. A business? As long as there's an IRS, everything is a business. There are costs involved in forming a union. There's rental of space for meetings, travel and training expenses. Let's not kid ourselves here, nothing is free, my friends.
I posted some facts and quotes to support my position, and I have plenty more. All this generalizing just leads me to believe that some postings on this issue is just the same old rhetoric I hear from my bosses.
Please, if we're going to discuss things, then let's just do that.
[Head banger] Wednesday, October 01, 2008 7:25:56 AM
life is not fair. expecting the media to be so is silly.
learn what you can on your own, base your decisions on that, a past record is usualy a good indicator of future performance. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:21:44 PM)
ronhartsell wrote:
Did I say the media was fair? I said it depends on what station (or something to that effect). Each news/ show/program seems to have their own slant depending on who they favor. Is that a fair? Absolutely not. I don't even really watch news programs and never claimed to, and for that very reason, there is no down the middle, only the facts allowed program that I am aware of. If there is, please do tell, then I might watch, but I'd rather watch and root for my Cubs in the playoffs. My points of view are mine and mine alone. I shared them on this board and am willing to discuss and learn (I've posted as such). Closed minded? I'm about as open minded as they come. Hell, I wish there was a third candidate to choose from, but we're stuck with these two, and like every other American I have to choose the one who I think will serve my best interests better than other. Hence, I choose Obama.
VICTIM OF METAL wrote:
I would love to, yet you've already stated that the media is fair to both sides. So i know where you stand on most issues. Debating politics with a closed mind is useless.
ronhartsell wrote:
Franklin Raines? You've got to be kidding me. C'mon VOM. He's nothing in this. He's had no personal contact (with the issue I know you are trying to raise) at all with Obama. He has never given any direct advice to Obama. He is one (of many) individuals that has been contacted one time by someone in his campaign committee, and Raines will tell you that himself. Again, he is nothing in this.
James A Johnson. I know he's been involved with numerous fortune 500 and 1000 companies, and I think he had a settlement of some kind not too long ago (earlier this year or last). He does have quite the reputation from what I understand, and is respected in some sectors. I also know he has made contributions to Obama's campaign. Other than that, I can't say that much about him.
C'mon, clue me in, I know you want to.
VICTIM OF METAL wrote:
Two names, Franklin Raines and James A. Johnson?
[ron h] Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:42:16 PM
Head Banger, It's sad to hear what happened. I can and will speak only of my experiences. I am close to the end of my 3 year term, and it's the first time I've held a union position. Aside from that, I have been a union member for a total of 12 years. I, like yourself, have witnessed injustices in the workplace such as the one you wrote about. To me, the union's credibility lies with the elected representatives, who's job it is to protect the innocent victims. If you have officers who lack moral conviction and a sense of responsibility and obligation to the workers they represent, then they are the worst types of people there are. I run an honest union. I make no excuses for the violators of workplace conduct. If they (and a few have tried) want to file a DFR (Duty to Fair Representation) charge, so be it. That is not why I do this job or take my responsibilities lightly. It's hard enough having to deal with bad management without dealing with situations like we're discussing here. It is my responsibility, as the Chairman, to co-ordinate the Committee persons (grievers/stewards) and collectively we decide whether to file grievances or not. In the case in your workplace, that injustice had to be a co-ordinated effort by the entire board, and they should have ALL been held accountable, that is why you attend union meetings. The collective group of all the workers is the union, not the elected officers, we are subject to the workforce, that is who we, as officers, answer to. Something like that has not happened in my workplace under my watch, and it never will!!! Hold your officers accountable!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:29:15 AM)
Head banger wrote:
sorry, I am late with a reply, got busy and forgot. anyway, if the union was only ever protecting the ones discriminated against, fine and well, but if a union employee harasses a union employee, the company fires the harasser, the union defends them, attacking their own member who was harassed. happened at my work, and the girl who was harassed ended up quiting, and spending some time in treatment, because of the way her union defended her attacker.
ronhartsell wrote:
If there were no bias or clicks or favorites or discrimination or sexual harassment or many, many other things that go on in the workplace then no, there wouldn't be a need. BUT THERE IS!!! Always have been, always will be. If you can put an end to all of that and leave it only up to an individuals' production, then there wouldn't be a need for protection. How many women have been fired for filing a sexual harassment charge? Or even worse, how many women don't file a charge out of fear of being terminated (or worse)?
Head banger wrote:
if your a good worker, why do you need protection? who would fire a good worker?
ronhartsell wrote:
Not true. In the Right to Work states, as the one I live in, employers do not even have to have a reason to terminate an employee. So, no, the worker does not have the right to say what he/she wants, there is no standing up for yourself without the risk of being terminated. How just is that?
BLOOD SUCKER Esquire wrote:
Why does your worker need you to speak for him? Can he not speak for himself through his own work? That's what counts.....the work. We speak of downsizing larger governenments in the betterment of the process. And yet, the unions need to maintain their control over the worker. We complain of the government pulling our strings. And yet allow unions to pull the strings of the employee to slow down progress and upward mobility.
You know what brings a worker to the same level as his employer? Hard work and production. THAT is power.
a. Hammerstein
ronhartsell wrote:
Do we actually read posts before posting. I wrote that I vote based on the candidates past voting record. What did I post that makes you post that the union buys this or tells you to do that. It's nowhere in my postings.
I do what I do in my union because I believe in workers rights, fair representation, and having a say in my working conditions. Unions allow workers to do that. A business? As long as there's an IRS, everything is a business. There are costs involved in forming a union. There's rental of space for meetings, travel and training expenses. Let's not kid ourselves here, nothing is free, my friends.
I posted some facts and quotes to support my position, and I have plenty more. All this generalizing just leads me to believe that some postings on this issue is just the same old rhetoric I hear from my bosses.
Please, if we're going to discuss things, then let's just do that.
[ron h] Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:21:44 PM
Did I say the media was fair? I said it depends on what station (or something to that effect). Each news/ show/program seems to have their own slant depending on who they favor. Is that a fair? Absolutely not. I don't even really watch news programs and never claimed to, and for that very reason, there is no down the middle, only the facts allowed program that I am aware of. If there is, please do tell, then I might watch, but I'd rather watch and root for my Cubs in the playoffs. My points of view are mine and mine alone. I shared them on this board and am willing to discuss and learn (I've posted as such). Closed minded? I'm about as open minded as they come. Hell, I wish there was a third candidate to choose from, but we're stuck with these two, and like every other American I have to choose the one who I think will serve my best interests better than other. Hence, I choose Obama. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by VICTIM OF METAL from Tuesday, September 30, 2008 5:33:00 AM)
VICTIM OF METAL wrote:
I would love to, yet you've already stated that the media is fair to both sides. So i know where you stand on most issues. Debating politics with a closed mind is useless.
ronhartsell wrote:
Franklin Raines? You've got to be kidding me. C'mon VOM. He's nothing in this. He's had no personal contact (with the issue I know you are trying to raise) at all with Obama. He has never given any direct advice to Obama. He is one (of many) individuals that has been contacted one time by someone in his campaign committee, and Raines will tell you that himself. Again, he is nothing in this.
James A Johnson. I know he's been involved with numerous fortune 500 and 1000 companies, and I think he had a settlement of some kind not too long ago (earlier this year or last). He does have quite the reputation from what I understand, and is respected in some sectors. I also know he has made contributions to Obama's campaign. Other than that, I can't say that much about him.
C'mon, clue me in, I know you want to.
VICTIM OF METAL wrote:
Two names, Franklin Raines and James A. Johnson?
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:33:14 AM
LOL @ Headbanger.. you got that right! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:17:37 AM)
Head banger wrote:
and, thank fuck the two morons want it, so I can get out.
MEDALGODDESS wrote:
[Head banger] Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:29:32 AM
no one has your best interests at heart beter than you. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by BLOOD SUCKER Esquire from Friday, September 26, 2008 5:21:10 PM)
BLOOD SUCKER Esquire wrote:
Once again, why oh why does the company have to take care of you after you retire? Use your own smarts and set up yopur own future. That's the mind-set that separates the average from the high achievers. Your pension should NEVER be your only source of retirement income. Who here doesn't have some sort of retirement strategy in place? If you don't, then you're a jobber that's relying on your companyb to take care of you. Wrong. You take care of you.
a. Hammerstein
ronhartsell wrote:
Let me also add this, our seniors, who have already worked hard their entire lives, deserve a secure and dignified retirement. McCain calls the current system of guaranteed monthly benefits for retirees an "absolute disgrace." He voted for Bush's plan to put Social Security funds into risky private accounts. Obama supports guaranteed monthly benefits earned by seniors. He opposes risky private accounts, which will slash benefits for seniors. I think we all know the state of SS benefits, but if there is going to be reform in this area, they have to come up with something a hell of a lot better than this. We've all spent our entire working lives paying for this by way of taxes out of every single paycheck, and to take a risky chance of losing it all? How can this be acceptable? This is the best we can do?
Thanks Painkiller and VOM for showing respect in this messed up world of politics. At the end of the day we may not all agree with each other, but I learn as much as I share when it comes to the issues, and it helps when opposing sides aren't going at each other's throats.
Painkiller1990 wrote:
It's not hard at all, Ron. Just tell us what McCain has voted for you disagree with regarding "labor" That's your main concern, I can appreciate that, but give me some specifics.
BTW, you should know that I am no McCain fan, but I know how bad the alternatives are.
So, if you don't mind, give me three specific things McCain has voted for which makes you think Obama would be a better president.
Thanks.
[Head banger] Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:29:15 AM
sorry, I am late with a reply, got busy and forgot. anyway, if the union was only ever protecting the ones discriminated against, fine and well, but if a union employee harasses a union employee, the company fires the harasser, the union defends them, attacking their own member who was harassed. happened at my work, and the girl who was harassed ended up quiting, and spending some time in treatment, because of the way her union defended her attacker. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Thursday, September 25, 2008 5:44:16 PM)
ronhartsell wrote:
If there were no bias or clicks or favorites or discrimination or sexual harassment or many, many other things that go on in the workplace then no, there wouldn't be a need. BUT THERE IS!!! Always have been, always will be. If you can put an end to all of that and leave it only up to an individuals' production, then there wouldn't be a need for protection. How many women have been fired for filing a sexual harassment charge? Or even worse, how many women don't file a charge out of fear of being terminated (or worse)?
Head banger wrote:
if your a good worker, why do you need protection? who would fire a good worker?
ronhartsell wrote:
Not true. In the Right to Work states, as the one I live in, employers do not even have to have a reason to terminate an employee. So, no, the worker does not have the right to say what he/she wants, there is no standing up for yourself without the risk of being terminated. How just is that?
BLOOD SUCKER Esquire wrote:
Why does your worker need you to speak for him? Can he not speak for himself through his own work? That's what counts.....the work. We speak of downsizing larger governenments in the betterment of the process. And yet, the unions need to maintain their control over the worker. We complain of the government pulling our strings. And yet allow unions to pull the strings of the employee to slow down progress and upward mobility.
You know what brings a worker to the same level as his employer? Hard work and production. THAT is power.
a. Hammerstein
ronhartsell wrote:
Do we actually read posts before posting. I wrote that I vote based on the candidates past voting record. What did I post that makes you post that the union buys this or tells you to do that. It's nowhere in my postings.
I do what I do in my union because I believe in workers rights, fair representation, and having a say in my working conditions. Unions allow workers to do that. A business? As long as there's an IRS, everything is a business. There are costs involved in forming a union. There's rental of space for meetings, travel and training expenses. Let's not kid ourselves here, nothing is free, my friends.
I posted some facts and quotes to support my position, and I have plenty more. All this generalizing just leads me to believe that some postings on this issue is just the same old rhetoric I hear from my bosses.
Please, if we're going to discuss things, then let's just do that.
[Head banger] Tuesday, September 30, 2008 8:17:37 AM
and, thank fuck the two morons want it, so I can get out. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by MEDALGODDESS from Monday, September 29, 2008 3:17:32 PM)
MEDALGODDESS wrote:
[VICTIM OF METAL] Tuesday, September 30, 2008 5:33:00 AM
I would love to, yet you've already stated that the media is fair to both sides. So i know where you stand on most issues. Debating politics with a closed mind is useless.
Franklin Raines? You've got to be kidding me. C'mon VOM. He's nothing in this. He's had no personal contact (with the issue I know you are trying to raise) at all with Obama. He has never given any direct advice to Obama. He is one (of many) individuals that has been contacted one time by someone in his campaign committee, and Raines will tell you that himself. Again, he is nothing in this.
James A Johnson. I know he's been involved with numerous fortune 500 and 1000 companies, and I think he had a settlement of some kind not too long ago (earlier this year or last). He does have quite the reputation from what I understand, and is respected in some sectors. I also know he has made contributions to Obama's campaign. Other than that, I can't say that much about him.
C'mon, clue me in, I know you want to.
VICTIM OF METAL wrote:
Two names, Franklin Raines and James A. Johnson?
[ron h] Monday, September 29, 2008 9:13:30 PM
Franklin Raines? You've got to be kidding me. C'mon VOM. He's nothing in this. He's had no personal contact (with the issue I know you are trying to raise) at all with Obama. He has never given any direct advice to Obama. He is one (of many) individuals that has been contacted one time by someone in his campaign committee, and Raines will tell you that himself. Again, he is nothing in this.
James A Johnson. I know he's been involved with numerous fortune 500 and 1000 companies, and I think he had a settlement of some kind not too long ago (earlier this year or last). He does have quite the reputation from what I understand, and is respected in some sectors. I also know he has made contributions to Obama's campaign. Other than that, I can't say that much about him.
C'mon, clue me in, I know you want to. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by VICTIM OF METAL from Monday, September 29, 2008 6:51:34 PM)
VICTIM OF METAL wrote:
Two names, Franklin Raines and James A. Johnson?
[VICTIM OF METAL] Monday, September 29, 2008 6:51:34 PM
Two names, Franklin Raines and James A. Johnson?
[ron h] Monday, September 29, 2008 6:30:08 PM
I will repeat, in brief, what I posted last week.
McCain has told me that nothing is going to change (for the better) if he is elected President.
[VICTIM OF METAL] Monday, September 29, 2008 6:14:54 PM
90 some democrats didn't even show up for the vote? Still on vacation?
[Soylentgreen4u] Monday, September 29, 2008 5:33:55 PM
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Monday, September 29, 2008 3:18:26 PM
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Monday, September 29, 2008 3:17:32 PM
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Monday, September 29, 2008 3:10:08 PM
LOL Meltdown are we related??? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by METAL MELTDOWN from Monday, September 29, 2008 2:59:01 PM)
METAL MELTDOWN wrote:
I'd gladly take 4 or 8 more years of Bill Clinton as opposed to the buffoon we have now or the upcoming POW!!! bush has concerted his efforts abroad and look at the mess we are in on the domestic front. And all you republicans out there please spare me the economic stimulus bullshit. It has not done a damned thing. bush WILL go down as THE worst president in our history. Hats off to him for 9/11 and afghanistan but other wise he sucks. they ALL saw this coming and if they pulled their collective noses out of Iraqs ass for a minute they could have done something about it....
MEDALGODDESS wrote:
I agree with you 100%... When one gives themselves presidential power,to do what ever when ever. Why bother with these types of things.. I agree... Mr treason himself will pass anything he wants to anywase. Just to bye himself the last remaining time he has in office..
And people can quit telling me this is Clintons fault... He ran the goverment under republican power.. Remeber???
HELLO......
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
"BAILOUT BILL DEFEATED"....DON'T BELIEVE IT FOR A MINUTE MG...THIS IS ALL JUST MORE POSTURING AND IDIOTIC THEATRICS...HAVE THOSE GOOD FOLKS FORGOTTEN THERE IS AN ELECTION COMING UP SOON?...THEY DEFEAT IT INITIALLY TO MAKE THEMSELVES LOOK GOOD,THEN THEY COME BACK LATER SAYING THEY GOT WHAT THEY DEMANDED IN CONSESSIONS AND IT WILL BE PASSED...PATHETIC LIARS WHO DON'T GIVE A CRAP ABOUT THE AVERAGE CITIZEN...THIS CRISIS WAS IN THE WORKS FOR YEARS AND YEARS,AND AFTER THE BAILOUT,IT WILL BEGIN AGAIN...WHY IS THERE NOT ANY CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BEING LAUNCHED AGAINST THESE S.O.B.'S?...IT'S BORDERLINE TREASON AGAINST THEIR COUNTRY IF YOU ASK ME.
MEDALGODDESS wrote:
Well I usally dont post out here.. But today... why not
Here comes your mortgage meltdown run for your lives......
Iam soo happy I do-not live in the USA.. anymore its turning into a communist state of severe depression..
Sorry if this offends all the G.W> Bush lovers out here.. But you reap what you sew.. as they say.
Peace.. Out..
[METAL MELTDOWN] Monday, September 29, 2008 2:59:01 PM
I'd gladly take 4 or 8 more years of Bill Clinton as opposed to the buffoon we have now or the upcoming POW!!! bush has concerted his efforts abroad and look at the mess we are in on the domestic front. And all you republicans out there please spare me the economic stimulus bullshit. It has not done a damned thing. bush WILL go down as THE worst president in our history. Hats off to him for 9/11 and afghanistan but other wise he sucks. they ALL saw this coming and if they pulled their collective noses out of Iraqs ass for a minute they could have done something about it.... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by MEDALGODDESS from Monday, September 29, 2008 2:33:59 PM)
MEDALGODDESS wrote:
I agree with you 100%... When one gives themselves presidential power,to do what ever when ever. Why bother with these types of things.. I agree... Mr treason himself will pass anything he wants to anywase. Just to bye himself the last remaining time he has in office..
And people can quit telling me this is Clintons fault... He ran the goverment under republican power.. Remeber???
HELLO......
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
"BAILOUT BILL DEFEATED"....DON'T BELIEVE IT FOR A MINUTE MG...THIS IS ALL JUST MORE POSTURING AND IDIOTIC THEATRICS...HAVE THOSE GOOD FOLKS FORGOTTEN THERE IS AN ELECTION COMING UP SOON?...THEY DEFEAT IT INITIALLY TO MAKE THEMSELVES LOOK GOOD,THEN THEY COME BACK LATER SAYING THEY GOT WHAT THEY DEMANDED IN CONSESSIONS AND IT WILL BE PASSED...PATHETIC LIARS WHO DON'T GIVE A CRAP ABOUT THE AVERAGE CITIZEN...THIS CRISIS WAS IN THE WORKS FOR YEARS AND YEARS,AND AFTER THE BAILOUT,IT WILL BEGIN AGAIN...WHY IS THERE NOT ANY CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BEING LAUNCHED AGAINST THESE S.O.B.'S?...IT'S BORDERLINE TREASON AGAINST THEIR COUNTRY IF YOU ASK ME.
MEDALGODDESS wrote:
Well I usally dont post out here.. But today... why not
Here comes your mortgage meltdown run for your lives......
Iam soo happy I do-not live in the USA.. anymore its turning into a communist state of severe depression..
Sorry if this offends all the G.W> Bush lovers out here.. But you reap what you sew.. as they say.
Peace.. Out..
[BLOOD SUCKER Esquire] Monday, September 29, 2008 2:48:13 PM
Don't go by me folks....I'm about as political as a cardboard box....there are 2nd graders who are more up to speed on what's happening than I am...might sound a bit sad...but....this kid barely has time to read a paper or watch the news...much less exact any time to do much of anything about it....
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Monday, September 29, 2008 2:33:59 PM
I agree with you 100%... When one gives themselves presidential power,to do what ever when ever. Why bother with these types of things.. I agree... Mr treason himself will pass anything he wants to anywase. Just to bye himself the last remaining time he has in office..
And people can quit telling me this is Clintons fault... He ran the goverment under republican power.. Remeber???
"BAILOUT BILL DEFEATED"....DON'T BELIEVE IT FOR A MINUTE MG...THIS IS ALL JUST MORE POSTURING AND IDIOTIC THEATRICS...HAVE THOSE GOOD FOLKS FORGOTTEN THERE IS AN ELECTION COMING UP SOON?...THEY DEFEAT IT INITIALLY TO MAKE THEMSELVES LOOK GOOD,THEN THEY COME BACK LATER SAYING THEY GOT WHAT THEY DEMANDED IN CONSESSIONS AND IT WILL BE PASSED...PATHETIC LIARS WHO DON'T GIVE A CRAP ABOUT THE AVERAGE CITIZEN...THIS CRISIS WAS IN THE WORKS FOR YEARS AND YEARS,AND AFTER THE BAILOUT,IT WILL BEGIN AGAIN...WHY IS THERE NOT ANY CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BEING LAUNCHED AGAINST THESE S.O.B.'S?...IT'S BORDERLINE TREASON AGAINST THEIR COUNTRY IF YOU ASK ME.
MEDALGODDESS wrote:
Well I usally dont post out here.. But today... why not
Here comes your mortgage meltdown run for your lives......
Iam soo happy I do-not live in the USA.. anymore its turning into a communist state of severe depression..
Sorry if this offends all the G.W> Bush lovers out here.. But you reap what you sew.. as they say.
Peace.. Out..
[Soylentgreen4u] Monday, September 29, 2008 2:05:40 PM
"BAILOUT BILL DEFEATED"....DON'T BELIEVE IT FOR A MINUTE MG...THIS IS ALL JUST MORE POSTURING AND IDIOTIC THEATRICS...HAVE THOSE GOOD FOLKS FORGOTTEN THERE IS AN ELECTION COMING UP SOON?...THEY DEFEAT IT INITIALLY TO MAKE THEMSELVES LOOK GOOD,THEN THEY COME BACK LATER SAYING THEY GOT WHAT THEY DEMANDED IN CONSESSIONS AND IT WILL BE PASSED...PATHETIC LIARS WHO DON'T GIVE A CRAP ABOUT THE AVERAGE CITIZEN...THIS CRISIS WAS IN THE WORKS FOR YEARS AND YEARS,AND AFTER THE BAILOUT,IT WILL BEGIN AGAIN...WHY IS THERE NOT ANY CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BEING LAUNCHED AGAINST THESE S.O.B.'S?...IT'S BORDERLINE TREASON AGAINST THEIR COUNTRY IF YOU ASK ME.
Well I usally dont post out here.. But today... why not
Here comes your mortgage meltdown run for your lives......
Iam soo happy I do-not live in the USA.. anymore its turning into a communist state of severe depression..
Sorry if this offends all the G.W> Bush lovers out here.. But you reap what you sew.. as they say.
Peace.. Out..
[Soylentgreen4u] Monday, September 29, 2008 1:50:57 PM
YEAH,WELL DON'T GET TOO COMFY HERE IN THE GREAT WHITE NORTH,CAUSE IF YOU DON'T START BEHAVING YOURSELF AND STOP POSTING THOSE PORNOGRAPHIC PICS OF PRIEST,I'LL
HAVE TO SEND YOU BACK!!! (TEE-HEE)... .......
Well I usally dont post out here.. But today... why not
Here comes your mortgage meltdown run for your lives......
Iam soo happy I do-not live in the USA.. anymore its turning into a communist state of severe depression..
Sorry if this offends all the G.W> Bush lovers out here.. But you reap what you sew.. as they say.
Peace.. Out..
[Justin Kenny] Monday, September 29, 2008 1:35:58 PM
Don't go by me folks....I'm about as political as a cardboard box....there are 2nd graders who are more up to speed on what's happening than I am...might sound a bit sad...but....this kid barely has time to read a paper or watch the news...much less exact any time to do much of anything about it....
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Monday, September 29, 2008 1:24:51 PM
Well I usally dont post out here.. But today... why not
Here comes your mortgage meltdown run for your lives......
Iam soo happy I do-not live in the USA.. anymore its turning into a communist state of severe depression..
Sorry if this offends all the G.W> Bush lovers out here.. But you reap what you sew.. as they say.
Peace.. Out..
[Kendall aka JudasRyche] Saturday, September 27, 2008 3:06:50 PM
And for those of you who are Canadian or do have knowledge to this fact ,
We are managed like any other herd. During the SARS outbreak in Toronto a couple of years ago, the head of the department for disease control was on television and for the first time publicly the public heard the term used for managing the public during such a crisis – and from the horse’s mouth came the term "herd management." That's what they call us. We are the herd. They're taught that now in high medical circles; and when there's to be an outbreak, they must manage the herd. Well moo, moo, moo. There you go. Surely it will be bah, bah, bah, because perhaps during all this crisis management, you won't see anything on television except professionals telling you what to do.
What to do during crisis management is quite simple. You do what you're told, because under the NATO agreement that every country signed in the west, you're to be contained in that area that's infected. No one gets out probably permanently. If you try and escape, you're to be shot on sight. If whole groups try to flee, they're to be bombed from the air with a special type of gas that kills you. That's our caretakers for you, you see; and when you stop worrying about who's going to do it to you, don't look to the Chinese. Don’t look to the Aboriginals of Australia with their weapons of mass destruction disguised as boomerangs, or anything else. It will be your own people who will do it to you, because they have hired lots of psychopaths to fly aircraft and to work in laboratories and spray you with various kinds of things.
They're so arrogant; in fact, they even declassify some of this documentation once in a while and let you know what they've done to you in the past. The people of Espanola in Ontario had been sprayed daily for months on end a few years ago by American aircraft that came across the Great Lakes. The women were having stillbirths. The natives noticed (some Indians there too) they noticed that even the deer were having stillbirths in the forest. Everyone had illnesses of one kind or another, tremendous bronchial problems. It went all the way to the Supreme Court where it was admitted they were being sprayed, but the substances they were being sprayed with couldn't be told to them – because of reasons of "National Security".
We are guinea pigs. In 1948 the government of Canada and the U.S. agreed to allow flying fortresses to come across into Canada and spray the entire city of Winnipeg for a couple of months at low level. When the National Health Service came up into being, they traced everyone down through their lives to see what they died of and what illnesses came upon them. Why are you afraid of outsiders, the oldest trick in the book, when most of it is done by your own people? Terrifying prospect, isn't it? However, that's the truth. They declassify this stuff generally after a generation has died off, because a new generation really doesn't care. It seems all unreal to them and it doesn't dawn on them that perhaps a new experiment has been perpetrated upon themselves. It doesn't dawn on them.
We’re always being used towards an agenda. The guys at the top in all countries, those who have succeeded in getting to the top through murder and mayhem and climbing over everyone else are the psychopaths that have an elite club, a world club. How does Baal glow? What is Baal? Baal is the god of sacrifice, the old one. Sometimes the sun, sometimes merriment, but also of sacrifice and that's what global is all about. You're watching the real “Illuminati” come to the fore (as they think of themselves), but in reality they're a substitute, very poor substitute too, because these characters have certainly lost their way and they're doing their best to make sure that we all go along in this false direction. We are at a critical phase, because no one within the general public has ever had a chance to vote, decide or even debate on any major topic that concerns their own lives or those around them. It's all done for us.
I see you are taking this as a debate. Well it isn't. I put Hollywood as an example to make a point. It is a Global agenda. Read the documentations from the CFR and the Royal institute of Foreign Affairs, U.N. Agenda 21. There aren'tdumb Canadians, Americans, etc. just those who have'nt "looked" and acknowledged the Published works of these foundations and Non-Governamental orgs. that run ALL policies in All gov'ts.
I say "eh" when I speak by the way. In fact I didn't know you are Canadian.
(Quoting Message by Soylentgreen4u from Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:45:47 PM)
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
I LOVE HOW YOU KEEP THROWING IN THE "EH".......SOOOO TYPICAL...WAIT A MINUTE,NOW I'M CONFUSED...YOU SAID HOLLYWOOD WAS THE GUIDING LIGHT FOR THE ENTIRE PLANET....BUT NOW YOU SAY IT'S A GLOBALIST AGENDA...YOU SHOULD BE A POLITICIAN ...OH COME ON NOW,REEEELAX,BE NICE....FORGIVE US DUMB CANADIANS...
EHHHHHH???...
Kendall aka JudasRyche wrote:
You are easily entertained eh? that's cool. (Holly)wood is just garbage for culture creation. Very simple. (enter)tainment. This is not one country's agenda, more like a globalist agenda. Always was.Most of your thoughts and judgements, opinions and fantasy has been given you, by all these means. Face it. Funny eh? (Quoting Message by Soylentgreen4u from Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:23:24 PM)
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
POOR BRITAIN WITH IT'S LITTLE PINEWOOD STUDIOS, SO HOLLYWOOD IS A GUIDING LIGHT FOR THE ENTIRE PLANET?...WOW!!!!,I HAD NO IDEA!,DARN THAT ELITIST LENIN,FOR THINKING ANYTHING DIFFERENT!...HOLLYWOOD THE GUIDING LIGHT FOR AN ENTIRE PLANET,
Hmmmmmm,MAYBE,I GUUUUUUUESS...GOOD THING THERE'S NO ELITIST ATTITUDES IN HOLLYWOOD.......
Kendall aka JudasRyche wrote:
Wow it's been a while..........
We're living in a matrix. A matrix where many levels are programmed for you to pop into and get more distorted with the illusions around you – very confusing if you're just waking up. Don't panic if you're starting to wake up, and don't fall into the usual traps of trying to find a savior in the form of a two-legged man on the planet to save you, it doesn't work. It doesn't matter whatever they promise you, they're generally frauds and put out there by the other side, be it politician or otherwise. You can't have a good world without participating in your own destiny. You can’t hand it to someone else and say please to it all for me. It doesn't work that way, never did work that way. We must all do our little bit towards altering the course we're on, and we mustn't go heads on with the controllers, because the controllers understand our nature is to hit them head on. That's what the chessboard is all about, the black and the white squares. You have to think things through and decide what kind of world it's supposed to be or could be, because, like the elitist Lenin said, there are a thousand directions humanity could take. It's just that the public mustn't be allowed to know it. They must think that the life they're born into and everything in it is natural. It must have evolved that way by itself. That's as simple as that.
The tragic thing about the world being changed now is that everyone is adopting the American culture, which isn't American either. It was created by a small dominant minority in the U.S. In the 1960’s and '70’s, international meetings were held by The Council on Foreign Relations in London with its parent organization The Royal Institute for International Affairs and all the other British Commonwealth groups were there present too. Published in the newspapers at the time, it said that they had all gathered to decide which country should take the lead in culture creation for the whole planet to give a standard culture worldwide. It was a toss-up between Britain with its little Pinewood Studios or Hollywood, and they decided to make Hollywood the guiding light for the entire planet and that's been done.
One of the biggest exports out of the U.S. happens to be movies and music, of course, because both are controlled within the U.S., big money. You can go into Africa and see people with the hats on backwards and the baggy pants. You can go anywhere in the world and see the same thing because you promote culture creation. Now the CIA has admitted that all during the Cold War, all the radical movements that you thought were communist were actually run by the CIA. The idea being, supposedly, according to themselves, that those who would want to join a group would go for the most radical, so they would make them the most radical of all; and that went for the music industry, the far-left political parties and everything else that you thought was the enemy. Run both sides of everything, and then you've got it made. It’s very, very simple. That's the world we live in.
Edited at: Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:38:27 PM
Edited at: Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:58:46 PM
[Kendall aka JudasRyche] Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:57:36 PM
I see you are taking this as a debate. Well it isn't. I put Hollywood as an example to make a point. It is a Global agenda. Read the documentations from the CFR and the Royal institute of Foreign Affairs, U.N. Agenda 21. There aren'tdumb Canadians, Americans, etc. just those who have'nt "looked" and acknowledged the Published works of these foundations and Non-Governamental orgs. that run ALL policies in All gov'ts.
I say "eh" when I speak by the way. In fact I didn't know you are Canadian.
I LOVE HOW YOU KEEP THROWING IN THE "EH".......SOOOO TYPICAL...WAIT A MINUTE,NOW I'M CONFUSED...YOU SAID HOLLYWOOD WAS THE GUIDING LIGHT FOR THE ENTIRE PLANET....BUT NOW YOU SAY IT'S A GLOBALIST AGENDA...YOU SHOULD BE A POLITICIAN ...OH COME ON NOW,REEEELAX,BE NICE....FORGIVE US DUMB CANADIANS...
EHHHHHH???...
Kendall aka JudasRyche wrote:
You are easily entertained eh? that's cool. (Holly)wood is just garbage for culture creation. Very simple. (enter)tainment. This is not one country's agenda, more like a globalist agenda. Always was.Most of your thoughts and judgements, opinions and fantasy has been given you, by all these means. Face it. Funny eh? (Quoting Message by Soylentgreen4u from Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:23:24 PM)
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
POOR BRITAIN WITH IT'S LITTLE PINEWOOD STUDIOS, SO HOLLYWOOD IS A GUIDING LIGHT FOR THE ENTIRE PLANET?...WOW!!!!,I HAD NO IDEA!,DARN THAT ELITIST LENIN,FOR THINKING ANYTHING DIFFERENT!...HOLLYWOOD THE GUIDING LIGHT FOR AN ENTIRE PLANET,
Hmmmmmm,MAYBE,I GUUUUUUUESS...GOOD THING THERE'S NO ELITIST ATTITUDES IN HOLLYWOOD.......
Kendall aka JudasRyche wrote:
Wow it's been a while..........
We're living in a matrix. A matrix where many levels are programmed for you to pop into and get more distorted with the illusions around you – very confusing if you're just waking up. Don't panic if you're starting to wake up, and don't fall into the usual traps of trying to find a savior in the form of a two-legged man on the planet to save you, it doesn't work. It doesn't matter whatever they promise you, they're generally frauds and put out there by the other side, be it politician or otherwise. You can't have a good world without participating in your own destiny. You can’t hand it to someone else and say please to it all for me. It doesn't work that way, never did work that way. We must all do our little bit towards altering the course we're on, and we mustn't go heads on with the controllers, because the controllers understand our nature is to hit them head on. That's what the chessboard is all about, the black and the white squares. You have to think things through and decide what kind of world it's supposed to be or could be, because, like the elitist Lenin said, there are a thousand directions humanity could take. It's just that the public mustn't be allowed to know it. They must think that the life they're born into and everything in it is natural. It must have evolved that way by itself. That's as simple as that.
The tragic thing about the world being changed now is that everyone is adopting the American culture, which isn't American either. It was created by a small dominant minority in the U.S. In the 1960’s and '70’s, international meetings were held by The Council on Foreign Relations in London with its parent organization The Royal Institute for International Affairs and all the other British Commonwealth groups were there present too. Published in the newspapers at the time, it said that they had all gathered to decide which country should take the lead in culture creation for the whole planet to give a standard culture worldwide. It was a toss-up between Britain with its little Pinewood Studios or Hollywood, and they decided to make Hollywood the guiding light for the entire planet and that's been done.
One of the biggest exports out of the U.S. happens to be movies and music, of course, because both are controlled within the U.S., big money. You can go into Africa and see people with the hats on backwards and the baggy pants. You can go anywhere in the world and see the same thing because you promote culture creation. Now the CIA has admitted that all during the Cold War, all the radical movements that you thought were communist were actually run by the CIA. The idea being, supposedly, according to themselves, that those who would want to join a group would go for the most radical, so they would make them the most radical of all; and that went for the music industry, the far-left political parties and everything else that you thought was the enemy. Run both sides of everything, and then you've got it made. It’s very, very simple. That's the world we live in.
Edited at: Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:38:27 PM
Edited at: Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:58:46 PM
[Soylentgreen4u] Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:45:47 PM
I LOVE HOW YOU KEEP THROWING IN THE "EH".......SOOOO TYPICAL...WAIT A MINUTE,NOW I'M CONFUSED...YOU SAID HOLLYWOOD WAS THE GUIDING LIGHT FOR THE ENTIRE PLANET....BUT NOW YOU SAY IT'S A GLOBALIST AGENDA...YOU SHOULD BE A POLITICIAN ...OH COME ON NOW,REEEELAX,BE NICE....FORGIVE US DUMB CANADIANS...
EHHHHHH???... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Kendall aka JudasRyche from Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:33:29 PM)
Kendall aka JudasRyche wrote:
You are easily entertained eh? that's cool. (Holly)wood is just garbage for culture creation. Very simple. (enter)tainment. This is not one country's agenda, more like a globalist agenda. Always was.Most of your thoughts and judgements, opinions and fantasy has been given you, by all these means. Face it. Funny eh? (Quoting Message by Soylentgreen4u from Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:23:24 PM)
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
POOR BRITAIN WITH IT'S LITTLE PINEWOOD STUDIOS, SO HOLLYWOOD IS A GUIDING LIGHT FOR THE ENTIRE PLANET?...WOW!!!!,I HAD NO IDEA!,DARN THAT ELITIST LENIN,FOR THINKING ANYTHING DIFFERENT!...HOLLYWOOD THE GUIDING LIGHT FOR AN ENTIRE PLANET,
Hmmmmmm,MAYBE,I GUUUUUUUESS...GOOD THING THERE'S NO ELITIST ATTITUDES IN HOLLYWOOD.......
Kendall aka JudasRyche wrote:
Wow it's been a while..........
We're living in a matrix. A matrix where many levels are programmed for you to pop into and get more distorted with the illusions around you – very confusing if you're just waking up. Don't panic if you're starting to wake up, and don't fall into the usual traps of trying to find a savior in the form of a two-legged man on the planet to save you, it doesn't work. It doesn't matter whatever they promise you, they're generally frauds and put out there by the other side, be it politician or otherwise. You can't have a good world without participating in your own destiny. You can’t hand it to someone else and say please to it all for me. It doesn't work that way, never did work that way. We must all do our little bit towards altering the course we're on, and we mustn't go heads on with the controllers, because the controllers understand our nature is to hit them head on. That's what the chessboard is all about, the black and the white squares. You have to think things through and decide what kind of world it's supposed to be or could be, because, like the elitist Lenin said, there are a thousand directions humanity could take. It's just that the public mustn't be allowed to know it. They must think that the life they're born into and everything in it is natural. It must have evolved that way by itself. That's as simple as that.
The tragic thing about the world being changed now is that everyone is adopting the American culture, which isn't American either. It was created by a small dominant minority in the U.S. In the 1960’s and '70’s, international meetings were held by The Council on Foreign Relations in London with its parent organization The Royal Institute for International Affairs and all the other British Commonwealth groups were there present too. Published in the newspapers at the time, it said that they had all gathered to decide which country should take the lead in culture creation for the whole planet to give a standard culture worldwide. It was a toss-up between Britain with its little Pinewood Studios or Hollywood, and they decided to make Hollywood the guiding light for the entire planet and that's been done.
One of the biggest exports out of the U.S. happens to be movies and music, of course, because both are controlled within the U.S., big money. You can go into Africa and see people with the hats on backwards and the baggy pants. You can go anywhere in the world and see the same thing because you promote culture creation. Now the CIA has admitted that all during the Cold War, all the radical movements that you thought were communist were actually run by the CIA. The idea being, supposedly, according to themselves, that those who would want to join a group would go for the most radical, so they would make them the most radical of all; and that went for the music industry, the far-left political parties and everything else that you thought was the enemy. Run both sides of everything, and then you've got it made. It’s very, very simple. That's the world we live in.
Edited at: Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:38:27 PM
[Kendall aka JudasRyche] Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:37:50 PM
We're treated like animals. Behavioral psychologists are paid incredible amounts of money to run huge think tanks to manipulate us with our fashions, our music and all the other things that go into culture. We emulate what we see, or as Charles Galton Darwin said, the people mimic. They mimic like monkeys. Now we can't refute everything they say because you can see it all around you when the fashions come out, suddenly everybody adopts it no matter what it is. If it's hanging pins out of your cheekbone or an anchor hanging from the back of your ear or something, the people will adopt it because the stars at the top make it trendy.
Plato talked about it 2,300 years ago how it did the same back then. Nothing new under the sun as they say. We have never been given the chance, certainly not in the last couple of hundred years, to really develop our individuality that came out of the Middle Ages. The feudal system where you had a collective type society that didn't know very much, you were kept in the dark. You would run through the forest and be terrified because you had been taught about demons, ghosts and spooks, and you'd run into that big church where the candles lit. You felt all secure and there's the man in the dress talking in a different language you couldn't understand, but it was magical and you're now protected. That's what happened and that was your world view of everything. God was in control.
In those days, of course, there was no personal god. It was just a big impersonal force that gave you rules and you had to obey. You didn't know about countries outside of your own. All you had to know was how to plow the land and bring in the corn and give it to your master. That was how very simple it was. For 200 years we had a little break, especially in the Americas, where an individual could go off and get lost in the big backwoods somewhere if they wanted to and be left alone, until unfortunately in came the lawyers and the housing committees and the women's committees, as they built towns and they wanted to standardize it all over again, and bring in taxation, rules and laws etc.
Now they've closed off pretty well all of the loopholes where a person could live independently. That little couple of hundred years we had of potential freedom, they want everyone in this system. They threw out the net and they do love nets. That's why you have the Inter-NET and the WEB. You get stuck on the web. There's no mistake in the terminology they use. It's always the same terminology over and over again; and for America, they gave you Webster's Dictionary. That's the world we live in, vastly controlled by people who think they're tremendously clever, dealing with a lot of people who are not so clever. They're not educated up to the same standard, but the reality is we're not psychopathic. Even the streetwise uneducated psychopath can see the cons from the top immediately. He identifies with the mentality of his superior psychopath up there in the business suit, so he has no problem seeing through all the little lies and games that go on, or the excuses that are peddled to the public on a daily basis.
You are easily entertained eh? that's cool. (Holly)wood is just garbage for culture creation. Very simple. (enter)tainment. This is not one country's agenda, more like a globalist agenda. Always was.Most of you thoughts and judgements, opinions and fantasy has been given you, by all these means. Face it. Funny eh?
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
POOR BRITAIN WITH IT'S LITTLE PINEWOOD STUDIOS, SO HOLLYWOOD IS A GUIDING LIGHT FOR THE ENTIRE PLANET?...WOW!!!!,I HAD NO IDEA!,DARN THAT ELITIST LENIN,FOR THINKING ANYTHING DIFFERENT!...HOLLYWOOD THE GUIDING LIGHT FOR AN ENTIRE PLANET,
Hmmmmmm,MAYBE,I GUUUUUUUESS...GOOD THING THERE'S NO ELITIST ATTITUDES IN HOLLYWOOD.......
Kendall aka JudasRyche wrote:
Wow it's been a while..........
We're living in a matrix. A matrix where many levels are programmed for you to pop into and get more distorted with the illusions around you – very confusing if you're just waking up. Don't panic if you're starting to wake up, and don't fall into the usual traps of trying to find a savior in the form of a two-legged man on the planet to save you, it doesn't work. It doesn't matter whatever they promise you, they're generally frauds and put out there by the other side, be it politician or otherwise. You can't have a good world without participating in your own destiny. You can’t hand it to someone else and say please to it all for me. It doesn't work that way, never did work that way. We must all do our little bit towards altering the course we're on, and we mustn't go heads on with the controllers, because the controllers understand our nature is to hit them head on. That's what the chessboard is all about, the black and the white squares. You have to think things through and decide what kind of world it's supposed to be or could be, because, like the elitist Lenin said, there are a thousand directions humanity could take. It's just that the public mustn't be allowed to know it. They must think that the life they're born into and everything in it is natural. It must have evolved that way by itself. That's as simple as that.
The tragic thing about the world being changed now is that everyone is adopting the American culture, which isn't American either. It was created by a small dominant minority in the U.S. In the 1960’s and '70’s, international meetings were held by The Council on Foreign Relations in London with its parent organization The Royal Institute for International Affairs and all the other British Commonwealth groups were there present too. Published in the newspapers at the time, it said that they had all gathered to decide which country should take the lead in culture creation for the whole planet to give a standard culture worldwide. It was a toss-up between Britain with its little Pinewood Studios or Hollywood, and they decided to make Hollywood the guiding light for the entire planet and that's been done.
One of the biggest exports out of the U.S. happens to be movies and music, of course, because both are controlled within the U.S., big money. You can go into Africa and see people with the hats on backwards and the baggy pants. You can go anywhere in the world and see the same thing because you promote culture creation. Now the CIA has admitted that all during the Cold War, all the radical movements that you thought were communist were actually run by the CIA. The idea being, supposedly, according to themselves, that those who would want to join a group would go for the most radical, so they would make them the most radical of all; and that went for the music industry, the far-left political parties and everything else that you thought was the enemy. Run both sides of everything, and then you've got it made. It’s very, very simple. That's the world we live in.
Edited at: Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:39:36 PM
[Kendall aka JudasRyche] Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:33:29 PM
You are easily entertained eh? that's cool. (Holly)wood is just garbage for culture creation. Very simple. (enter)tainment. This is not one country's agenda, more like a globalist agenda. Always was.Most of your thoughts and judgements, opinions and fantasy has been given you, by all these means. Face it. Funny eh? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Soylentgreen4u from Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:23:24 PM)
Soylentgreen4u wrote:
POOR BRITAIN WITH IT'S LITTLE PINEWOOD STUDIOS, SO HOLLYWOOD IS A GUIDING LIGHT FOR THE ENTIRE PLANET?...WOW!!!!,I HAD NO IDEA!,DARN THAT ELITIST LENIN,FOR THINKING ANYTHING DIFFERENT!...HOLLYWOOD THE GUIDING LIGHT FOR AN ENTIRE PLANET,
Hmmmmmm,MAYBE,I GUUUUUUUESS...GOOD THING THERE'S NO ELITIST ATTITUDES IN HOLLYWOOD.......
Kendall aka JudasRyche wrote:
Wow it's been a while..........
We're living in a matrix. A matrix where many levels are programmed for you to pop into and get more distorted with the illusions around you – very confusing if you're just waking up. Don't panic if you're starting to wake up, and don't fall into the usual traps of trying to find a savior in the form of a two-legged man on the planet to save you, it doesn't work. It doesn't matter whatever they promise you, they're generally frauds and put out there by the other side, be it politician or otherwise. You can't have a good world without participating in your own destiny. You can’t hand it to someone else and say please to it all for me. It doesn't work that way, never did work that way. We must all do our little bit towards altering the course we're on, and we mustn't go heads on with the controllers, because the controllers understand our nature is to hit them head on. That's what the chessboard is all about, the black and the white squares. You have to think things through and decide what kind of world it's supposed to be or could be, because, like the elitist Lenin said, there are a thousand directions humanity could take. It's just that the public mustn't be allowed to know it. They must think that the life they're born into and everything in it is natural. It must have evolved that way by itself. That's as simple as that.
The tragic thing about the world being changed now is that everyone is adopting the American culture, which isn't American either. It was created by a small dominant minority in the U.S. In the 1960’s and '70’s, international meetings were held by The Council on Foreign Relations in London with its parent organization The Royal Institute for International Affairs and all the other British Commonwealth groups were there present too. Published in the newspapers at the time, it said that they had all gathered to decide which country should take the lead in culture creation for the whole planet to give a standard culture worldwide. It was a toss-up between Britain with its little Pinewood Studios or Hollywood, and they decided to make Hollywood the guiding light for the entire planet and that's been done.
One of the biggest exports out of the U.S. happens to be movies and music, of course, because both are controlled within the U.S., big money. You can go into Africa and see people with the hats on backwards and the baggy pants. You can go anywhere in the world and see the same thing because you promote culture creation. Now the CIA has admitted that all during the Cold War, all the radical movements that you thought were communist were actually run by the CIA. The idea being, supposedly, according to themselves, that those who would want to join a group would go for the most radical, so they would make them the most radical of all; and that went for the music industry, the far-left political parties and everything else that you thought was the enemy. Run both sides of everything, and then you've got it made. It’s very, very simple. That's the world we live in.
Edited at: Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:38:27 PM
[Soylentgreen4u] Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:23:24 PM
POOR BRITAIN WITH IT'S LITTLE PINEWOOD STUDIOS, SO HOLLYWOOD IS A GUIDING LIGHT FOR THE ENTIRE PLANET?...WOW!!!!,I HAD NO IDEA!,DARN THAT ELITIST LENIN,FOR THINKING ANYTHING DIFFERENT!...HOLLYWOOD THE GUIDING LIGHT FOR AN ENTIRE PLANET,
Hmmmmmm,MAYBE,I GUUUUUUUESS...GOOD THING THERE'S NO ELITIST ATTITUDES IN HOLLYWOOD....... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Kendall aka JudasRyche from Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:08:27 PM)
Kendall aka JudasRyche wrote:
Wow it's been a while..........
We're living in a matrix. A matrix where many levels are programmed for you to pop into and get more distorted with the illusions around you – very confusing if you're just waking up. Don't panic if you're starting to wake up, and don't fall into the usual traps of trying to find a savior in the form of a two-legged man on the planet to save you, it doesn't work. It doesn't matter whatever they promise you, they're generally frauds and put out there by the other side, be it politician or otherwise. You can't have a good world without participating in your own destiny. You can’t hand it to someone else and say please to it all for me. It doesn't work that way, never did work that way. We must all do our little bit towards altering the course we're on, and we mustn't go heads on with the controllers, because the controllers understand our nature is to hit them head on. That's what the chessboard is all about, the black and the white squares. You have to think things through and decide what kind of world it's supposed to be or could be, because, like the elitist Lenin said, there are a thousand directions humanity could take. It's just that the public mustn't be allowed to know it. They must think that the life they're born into and everything in it is natural. It must have evolved that way by itself. That's as simple as that.
The tragic thing about the world being changed now is that everyone is adopting the American culture, which isn't American either. It was created by a small dominant minority in the U.S. In the 1960’s and '70’s, international meetings were held by The Council on Foreign Relations in London with its parent organization The Royal Institute for International Affairs and all the other British Commonwealth groups were there present too. Published in the newspapers at the time, it said that they had all gathered to decide which country should take the lead in culture creation for the whole planet to give a standard culture worldwide. It was a toss-up between Britain with its little Pinewood Studios or Hollywood, and they decided to make Hollywood the guiding light for the entire planet and that's been done.
One of the biggest exports out of the U.S. happens to be movies and music, of course, because both are controlled within the U.S., big money. You can go into Africa and see people with the hats on backwards and the baggy pants. You can go anywhere in the world and see the same thing because you promote culture creation. Now the CIA has admitted that all during the Cold War, all the radical movements that you thought were communist were actually run by the CIA. The idea being, supposedly, according to themselves, that those who would want to join a group would go for the most radical, so they would make them the most radical of all; and that went for the music industry, the far-left political parties and everything else that you thought was the enemy. Run both sides of everything, and then you've got it made. It’s very, very simple. That's the world we live in.
[Kendall aka JudasRyche] Saturday, September 27, 2008 2:08:27 PM
Wow it's been a while..........
We're living in a matrix. A matrix where many levels are programmed for you to pop into and get more distorted with the illusions around you – very confusing if you're just waking up. Don't panic if you're starting to wake up, and don't fall into the usual traps of trying to find a savior in the form of a two-legged man on the planet to save you, it doesn't work. It doesn't matter whatever they promise you, they're generally frauds and put out there by the other side, be it politician or otherwise. You can't have a good world without participating in your own destiny. You can’t hand it to someone else and say please to it all for me. It doesn't work that way, never did work that way. We must all do our little bit towards altering the course we're on, and we mustn't go heads on with the controllers, because the controllers understand our nature is to hit them head on. That's what the chessboard is all about, the black and the white squares. You have to think things through and decide what kind of world it's supposed to be or could be, because, like the elitist Lenin said, there are a thousand directions humanity could take. It's just that the public mustn't be allowed to know it. They must think that the life they're born into and everything in it is natural. It must have evolved that way by itself. That's as simple as that.
The tragic thing about the world being changed now is that everyone is adopting the American culture, which isn't American either. It was created by a small dominant minority in the U.S. In the 1960’s and '70’s, international meetings were held by The Council on Foreign Relations in London with its parent organization The Royal Institute for International Affairs and all the other British Commonwealth groups were there present too. Published in the newspapers at the time, it said that they had all gathered to decide which country should take the lead in culture creation for the whole planet to give a standard culture worldwide. It was a toss-up between Britain with its little Pinewood Studios or Hollywood, and they decided to make Hollywood the guiding light for the entire planet and that's been done.
One of the biggest exports out of the U.S. happens to be movies and music, of course, because both are controlled within the U.S., big money. You can go into Africa and see people with the hats on backwards and the baggy pants. You can go anywhere in the world and see the same thing because you promote culture creation. Now the CIA has admitted that all during the Cold War, all the radical movements that you thought were communist were actually run by the CIA. The idea being, supposedly, according to themselves, that those who would want to join a group would go for the most radical, so they would make them the most radical of all; and that went for the music industry, the far-left political parties and everything else that you thought was the enemy. Run both sides of everything, and then you've got it made. It’s very, very simple. That's the world we live in.
[guidogodoy] Friday, September 26, 2008 9:48:27 PM
Haaaaa!!!!! Just finished watching myself and I can't help but agree. Can't wait for the CNN "thinktank" to start ripping both of them apart. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by VICTIM OF METAL from Friday, September 26, 2008 8:24:22 PM)
VICTIM OF METAL wrote:
Wow, 17mins. into this debate and Obama is nervous and babbling. He doesn't seem to comfortable in this type setting? It's like watching the Honeymoners, hummminnaaa hummminnaaa...I'm not sayin' McCain is on the level with all he's saying, but he is in a zone.
[Soylentgreen4u] Friday, September 26, 2008 9:39:03 PM
"SNIFF,SNIFF"...I SENSE INTERNAL SQUABBLING A COMING!...
[VICTIM OF METAL] Friday, September 26, 2008 8:24:22 PM
Wow, 17mins. into this debate and Obama is nervous and babbling. He doesn't seem to comfortable in this type setting? It's like watching the Honeymoners, hummminnaaa hummminnaaa...I'm not sayin' McCain is on the level with all he's saying, but he is in a zone.
[ron h] Friday, September 26, 2008 7:01:57 PM
I wasn't going to bring that up, but Hmmm...... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Friday, September 26, 2008 6:43:26 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
What? Only ONE VP debate? Damn, I want to hear Palin speak more. Ummm...a bit interested in hearing about the woman who might be an old white guy's heartbeat away from the Presidency. Edited at: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:56:14 PM
[guidogodoy] Friday, September 26, 2008 6:43:26 PM
What? Only ONE VP debate? Damn, I want to hear Palin speak more. Ummm...a bit interested in hearing about the woman who might be an old white guy's heartbeat away from the Presidency. Edited at: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:56:14 PM
[ron h] Friday, September 26, 2008 6:19:43 PM
The construction industry, the roofing industry are tough. Living in the Chicago land area, there are (exaggeration here) millions of small businesses that even pay cash for that kind of work. These are tough jobs, not everyone can handle that type of work. Where's all the new construction at? How many retired roofers do you know? I don't think there's a market that hasn't been affected in a bad way, unless you make ammo and equipment for the military.
[VICTIM OF METAL] Friday, September 26, 2008 6:03:43 PM
I was in construction! Not anymore. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Friday, September 26, 2008 6:00:11 PM)
ronhartsell wrote:
Why shouldn't they? If you work at the same company long enough to get a pension (usually 25-30 yrs.) what's wrong with that? It's a two way street. Most people I know live paycheck to paycheck working for profitable companies, why is it only those at the top reap the benefits of the profits? We all do our fair share to make the company profitable, right?
BLOOD SUCKER Esquire wrote:
Once again, why oh why does the company have to take care of you after you retire? Use your own smarts and set up yopur own future. That's the mind-set that separates the average from the high achievers. Your pension should NEVER be your only source of retirement income. Who here doesn't have some sort of retirement strategy in place? If you don't, then you're a jobber that's relying on your companyb to take care of you. Wrong. You take care of you.
a. Hammerstein
ronhartsell wrote:
Let me also add this, our seniors, who have already worked hard their entire lives, deserve a secure and dignified retirement. McCain calls the current system of guaranteed monthly benefits for retirees an "absolute disgrace." He voted for Bush's plan to put Social Security funds into risky private accounts. Obama supports guaranteed monthly benefits earned by seniors. He opposes risky private accounts, which will slash benefits for seniors. I think we all know the state of SS benefits, but if there is going to be reform in this area, they have to come up with something a hell of a lot better than this. We've all spent our entire working lives paying for this by way of taxes out of every single paycheck, and to take a risky chance of losing it all? How can this be acceptable? This is the best we can do?
Thanks Painkiller and VOM for showing respect in this messed up world of politics. At the end of the day we may not all agree with each other, but I learn as much as I share when it comes to the issues, and it helps when opposing sides aren't going at each other's throats.
Painkiller1990 wrote:
It's not hard at all, Ron. Just tell us what McCain has voted for you disagree with regarding "labor" That's your main concern, I can appreciate that, but give me some specifics.
BTW, you should know that I am no McCain fan, but I know how bad the alternatives are.
So, if you don't mind, give me three specific things McCain has voted for which makes you think Obama would be a better president.
Thanks.
Edited at: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:05:18 PM
[ron h] Friday, September 26, 2008 6:00:11 PM
Why shouldn't they? If you work at the same company long enough to get a pension (usually 25-30 yrs.) what's wrong with that? It's a two way street. Most people I know live paycheck to paycheck working for profitable companies, why is it only those at the top reap the benefits of the profits? We all do our fair share to make the company profitable, right? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by BLOOD SUCKER Esquire from Friday, September 26, 2008 5:21:10 PM)
BLOOD SUCKER Esquire wrote:
Once again, why oh why does the company have to take care of you after you retire? Use your own smarts and set up yopur own future. That's the mind-set that separates the average from the high achievers. Your pension should NEVER be your only source of retirement income. Who here doesn't have some sort of retirement strategy in place? If you don't, then you're a jobber that's relying on your companyb to take care of you. Wrong. You take care of you.
a. Hammerstein
ronhartsell wrote:
Let me also add this, our seniors, who have already worked hard their entire lives, deserve a secure and dignified retirement. McCain calls the current system of guaranteed monthly benefits for retirees an "absolute disgrace." He voted for Bush's plan to put Social Security funds into risky private accounts. Obama supports guaranteed monthly benefits earned by seniors. He opposes risky private accounts, which will slash benefits for seniors. I think we all know the state of SS benefits, but if there is going to be reform in this area, they have to come up with something a hell of a lot better than this. We've all spent our entire working lives paying for this by way of taxes out of every single paycheck, and to take a risky chance of losing it all? How can this be acceptable? This is the best we can do?
Thanks Painkiller and VOM for showing respect in this messed up world of politics. At the end of the day we may not all agree with each other, but I learn as much as I share when it comes to the issues, and it helps when opposing sides aren't going at each other's throats.
Painkiller1990 wrote:
It's not hard at all, Ron. Just tell us what McCain has voted for you disagree with regarding "labor" That's your main concern, I can appreciate that, but give me some specifics.
BTW, you should know that I am no McCain fan, but I know how bad the alternatives are.
So, if you don't mind, give me three specific things McCain has voted for which makes you think Obama would be a better president.
Thanks.
[VICTIM OF METAL] Friday, September 26, 2008 5:42:14 PM
It's sort of hard to do that with the way the economy is right now. Especially if your job forces you to change mid-stride! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by BLOOD SUCKER Esquire from Friday, September 26, 2008 5:21:10 PM)
BLOOD SUCKER Esquire wrote:
Once again, why oh why does the company have to take care of you after you retire? Use your own smarts and set up yopur own future. That's the mind-set that separates the average from the high achievers. Your pension should NEVER be your only source of retirement income. Who here doesn't have some sort of retirement strategy in place? If you don't, then you're a jobber that's relying on your companyb to take care of you. Wrong. You take care of you.
a. Hammerstein
ronhartsell wrote:
Let me also add this, our seniors, who have already worked hard their entire lives, deserve a secure and dignified retirement. McCain calls the current system of guaranteed monthly benefits for retirees an "absolute disgrace." He voted for Bush's plan to put Social Security funds into risky private accounts. Obama supports guaranteed monthly benefits earned by seniors. He opposes risky private accounts, which will slash benefits for seniors. I think we all know the state of SS benefits, but if there is going to be reform in this area, they have to come up with something a hell of a lot better than this. We've all spent our entire working lives paying for this by way of taxes out of every single paycheck, and to take a risky chance of losing it all? How can this be acceptable? This is the best we can do?
Thanks Painkiller and VOM for showing respect in this messed up world of politics. At the end of the day we may not all agree with each other, but I learn as much as I share when it comes to the issues, and it helps when opposing sides aren't going at each other's throats.
Painkiller1990 wrote:
It's not hard at all, Ron. Just tell us what McCain has voted for you disagree with regarding "labor" That's your main concern, I can appreciate that, but give me some specifics.
BTW, you should know that I am no McCain fan, but I know how bad the alternatives are.
So, if you don't mind, give me three specific things McCain has voted for which makes you think Obama would be a better president.
Thanks.
[BLOOD SUCKER Esquire] Friday, September 26, 2008 5:21:10 PM
Once again, why oh why does the company have to take care of you after you retire? Use your own smarts and set up yopur own future. That's the mind-set that separates the average from the high achievers. Your pension should NEVER be your only source of retirement income. Who here doesn't have some sort of retirement strategy in place? If you don't, then you're a jobber that's relying on your companyb to take care of you. Wrong. You take care of you.
Let me also add this, our seniors, who have already worked hard their entire lives, deserve a secure and dignified retirement. McCain calls the current system of guaranteed monthly benefits for retirees an "absolute disgrace." He voted for Bush's plan to put Social Security funds into risky private accounts. Obama supports guaranteed monthly benefits earned by seniors. He opposes risky private accounts, which will slash benefits for seniors. I think we all know the state of SS benefits, but if there is going to be reform in this area, they have to come up with something a hell of a lot better than this. We've all spent our entire working lives paying for this by way of taxes out of every single paycheck, and to take a risky chance of losing it all? How can this be acceptable? This is the best we can do?
Thanks Painkiller and VOM for showing respect in this messed up world of politics. At the end of the day we may not all agree with each other, but I learn as much as I share when it comes to the issues, and it helps when opposing sides aren't going at each other's throats.
Painkiller1990 wrote:
It's not hard at all, Ron. Just tell us what McCain has voted for you disagree with regarding "labor" That's your main concern, I can appreciate that, but give me some specifics.
BTW, you should know that I am no McCain fan, but I know how bad the alternatives are.
So, if you don't mind, give me three specific things McCain has voted for which makes you think Obama would be a better president.
Thanks.
[VICTIM OF METAL] Friday, September 26, 2008 4:58:49 PM
See the thing about this thread is, there isn't hate and bashing, maybe a sprinkle here and there but we are civil towards each other. Just airing our opinions and views and debating somewhat. Lets keep it that way, please. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Friday, September 26, 2008 11:57:06 AM)
ronhartsell wrote:
Let me also add this, our seniors, who have already worked hard their entire lives, deserve a secure and dignified retirement. McCain calls the current system of guaranteed monthly benefits for retirees an "absolute disgrace." He voted for Bush's plan to put Social Security funds into risky private accounts. Obama supports guaranteed monthly benefits earned by seniors. He opposes risky private accounts, which will slash benefits for seniors. I think we all know the state of SS benefits, but if there is going to be reform in this area, they have to come up with something a hell of a lot better than this. We've all spent our entire working lives paying for this by way of taxes out of every single paycheck, and to take a risky chance of losing it all? How can this be acceptable? This is the best we can do?
Thanks Painkiller and VOM for showing respect in this messed up world of politics. At the end of the day we may not all agree with each other, but I learn as much as I share when it comes to the issues, and it helps when opposing sides aren't going at each other's throats.
Painkiller1990 wrote:
It's not hard at all, Ron. Just tell us what McCain has voted for you disagree with regarding "labor" That's your main concern, I can appreciate that, but give me some specifics.
BTW, you should know that I am no McCain fan, but I know how bad the alternatives are.
So, if you don't mind, give me three specific things McCain has voted for which makes you think Obama would be a better president.
Thanks.
[VICTIM OF METAL] Friday, September 26, 2008 4:36:50 PM
Didn' t Harry Reed say, "the war is lost", before the surge! Obama said "we air raided innocent people in villages"! Do these guys sound like American leaders who stand with honor behind our troops? I don't care if your on the left, or on the right. Or somewhere in the middle. Supporting the people willing to defend us with their lives is the least we can do.
[ron h] Friday, September 26, 2008 11:57:06 AM
Let me also add this, our seniors, who have already worked hard their entire lives, deserve a secure and dignified retirement. McCain calls the current system of guaranteed monthly benefits for retirees an "absolute disgrace." He voted for Bush's plan to put Social Security funds into risky private accounts. Obama supports guaranteed monthly benefits earned by seniors. He opposes risky private accounts, which will slash benefits for seniors. I think we all know the state of SS benefits, but if there is going to be reform in this area, they have to come up with something a hell of a lot better than this. We've all spent our entire working lives paying for this by way of taxes out of every single paycheck, and to take a risky chance of losing it all? How can this be acceptable? This is the best we can do?
Thanks Painkiller and VOM for showing respect in this messed up world of politics. At the end of the day we may not all agree with each other, but I learn as much as I share when it comes to the issues, and it helps when opposing sides aren't going at each other's throats. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Painkiller1990 from Friday, September 26, 2008 5:50:27 AM)
Painkiller1990 wrote:
It's not hard at all, Ron. Just tell us what McCain has voted for you disagree with regarding "labor" That's your main concern, I can appreciate that, but give me some specifics.
BTW, you should know that I am no McCain fan, but I know how bad the alternatives are.
So, if you don't mind, give me three specific things McCain has voted for which makes you think Obama would be a better president.
Thanks.
[ron h] Friday, September 26, 2008 11:38:42 AM
I don't have a lot of time here, so this'll have to be quick. Also, my voting history will show that I have voted for both Dem. and Rep. pres. candidates in the past, I have never followed strict party lines.
For starters, read my post dated Sept. 24, 2008 7:11:45 AM.
Now I'll add this,
McCain has no plan to provide health care for all Americans. Like Bush, he relies on so-called "health savings accounts," a phony reform backed by insurance lobbyists which undermines existing employer-based policies. Under his plan, Americans will face reduced benefits, higher costs and leaving millions still without coverage. He also supports a tax on our health care benefits, which would be a huge tax increase for working families.
Obama has a health care plan for all Americans. Those currently insured will keep their health plans at a lower cost. The uninsured, self-employed and small businesses will be eligible for a new national health plan similar to the coverage now available to members of Congress. No Americans will be turned away from any insurance because of pre-existing conditions. He is opposed to a tax on health benefits. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Painkiller1990 from Friday, September 26, 2008 5:50:27 AM)
Painkiller1990 wrote:
It's not hard at all, Ron. Just tell us what McCain has voted for you disagree with regarding "labor" That's your main concern, I can appreciate that, but give me some specifics.
BTW, you should know that I am no McCain fan, but I know how bad the alternatives are.
So, if you don't mind, give me three specific things McCain has voted for which makes you think Obama would be a better president.
Thanks.
[Painkiller1990] Friday, September 26, 2008 5:50:27 AM
It's not hard at all, Ron. Just tell us what McCain has voted for you disagree with regarding "labor" That's your main concern, I can appreciate that, but give me some specifics.
BTW, you should know that I am no McCain fan, but I know how bad the alternatives are.
So, if you don't mind, give me three specific things McCain has voted for which makes you think Obama would be a better president.
Thanks.
[ron h] Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:32:38 PM
Things would be different/balanced if environmental standards were equally enforced world wide. They are not. You are absolutely correct, but that is not a bad thing. Are you telling me screw the environment so we can keep people working? Why not enforce the same regulations world wide? That is one big issue. NO, don't lower our standards, raise everyone else's. Why do you think work leaves our borders? Lower wages, no health care, no workplace safety, no environmental regulations. And the American auto industry does need help. When the average CEO makes more money by lunch on the first day of the year than a minimum wage worker makes all year long, why should the worker be the first to sacrifice? No doubt that agreements made in the past come back to haunt, times change. That's what makes our gov. so great, we can change policies that don't work anymore. You are also right about Obama's comparatively short time in the Senate, but I've got years to draw on McCain's votes, and I don't want him as my President, period. And for the record, I'm not a political anything. I'm a worker and a family man and things have not been working for a long time and that needs to change. McCain tell's me that nothing is going to change and I can't stand for that. I've been a supervisor, a Teamster truck driver, a UAW worker and I've worked in non-union plants as a non-union worker. I'm not disassociating myself at all, I've worked in numerous sectors, and the problems are the same everwhere, regardless. I'm not trying to tell you differently, I don't care if you get it or not, but I do know as I have my work history to prove it. Labor is labor, union or no union, believe what you want. Can't say anything about the light bulb situation as I am not familiar with it. And read the other posts, going by previous voting record applies to all candidates, not just presidential, and I do vote for good republican candidates as well. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Painkiller1990 from Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:25:58 PM)
Painkiller1990 wrote:
Ron,
You said there have been over 3 million production jobs lost in the last eight years? Where do you get your facts from? The US is still the #1 manufacturer in the world, China is now #2. You obviously blame Bush for what you believe. So, let's take a look at who's really to blame here.
Let's start with the auto industry. The US is the world leader in auto manufacturing throughout the world. People love our cars.
In the US, the Government has just approved a 25 billion dollar bailout of the auto makers. GM I believe... So, I ask you, why is this? Why are American auto makers struggling to keep up with Toyota? I'll tell you, over regulation, and this is a fact. Liberal Democrats are beholden to the environmentalist lobby in this country. You can start with Al Gore and work your way down the ladder. These idiots have instituted unreasonable CAFE standards on the auto industry, forcing them to make their cars differently here in the States than in the rest of the world. The result is poor sales domestically. The Government is to blame for this. So, sales go down and jobs go away because demand for these cars is lower than it should be. Thank you very much to the Democratic party. Now, that's who's fault it is, this isn't a game of pass the buck, this is the truth.
TThat's just one example. Another example is the Liberals in Washington making it illegal to make, sell, or buy incandescent light bulbs in the US come 2010. Democrats passed this bill to outlaw them, not Republicans. And oh how sweet a deal it is for the CHICOMS because the only place the green bulbs are made thet we're now forced to buy is in China. Again, I want to strees... Liberal environmental Democrats are responsible for this. Say goodbye to jobs anywhere in the US where incandescent light bulbs are made in the US.
Only to be replaced by bulbs full of mercury powder... again, thank you to the Democratic party.
Let me also say this, you cannot disassociate yourself from Unions if you're a labor guy. Labor and Unions are one in the same. That's the way it is and I'll not be told differently. Let's look at how Unions have caused people to lose their jobs. Again, back to GM. Unions strong armed GM into large salaries (That aint a bad thing, btw) but they also negotiated huge pensions, retirement healthcare packages that not only cover the retired worker, but their families too.
This was all fine at the time but times have changed. Since the ridiculous regulations were thrust upon car manufacturers sales have taken a nose dive and GM couldn't do business any longer like it had. People got laid off, major cutbacks were implemented, and now they need help from the Government, all because of your liberal Democratic party.
And lets look at this current debacle we're in, all caused by liberal Democrats. The original brain-child of Jimmy Carter, modified by Bill Clinton, enforced by Janet Reno, mortgage companies were forced to lend money to people who could not pay it back. Minorities, low income people, even illegal aliens were given mortgages to buy homes that they could not pay back. This was done in the name of compassion by liberal Democrats, not Republican. Fannie and Freddy at the time, headed up by Frankin Raines (Who currently works on the Obama Campaign as an economic advisor) Raines made 100 million dollars over 7 years because he kept buying up all these bad loans that weren't getting paid back. They bought so many to inflate their assets on paper, and Raines ended up with huge bonuses, only to be kicked out of there due to all the fraud. Same thing with Jim Johnson, who also happens to be on the Obama economic team. He was booted out of there too due to fraud. Fannie and Freddy were nothing less than a Democratic piggy bank. Chris Dodd took the most money from them, I believe, a ten year period... Obama comes in at #2 in receiving money from them after only three years, then there's Barny Frank, Jamie Gorelick, Chck Schumer, and on and on. Meanwhile, in 2003 Bush called for reforms to F&F, McCain called for reforms in 2005, warning of this exact precise thing. Democrats killed any and all attempts to reform it. Rather, Barny Frank was out there telling everyone there is no problem with F&F, they're fine. Chris Dodd too. Barny Frank, we now just found out, was in a gay relationship with the high ranking member of F&F. The Democratic party was allowing all this scandal and back door favors to happen while getting filthy rich on the backs of tax payers mortgages.
Now, the idea that you only vote based on the voting record of the candidate is either a flat out lie, or, you're just a political hack who would vote for a Democrat no matter who was running, or, you simply aren't aware of what's really going on with this party, Obama included.
There's no way you could vote for Obama based on his voting record because he's been in the Senate only 183 days before he started running for President. He's got no voting record to speak of, he's inexperienced and not qualified to be dog catcher, never mind President. Edited at: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:27:09 PM Edited at: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:31:24 PM Edited at: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:32:59 PM
[Painkiller1990] Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:25:58 PM
Ron,
You said there have been over 3 million production jobs lost in the last eight years? Where do you get your facts from? The US is still the #1 manufacturer in the world, China is now #2. You obviously blame Bush for what you believe. So, let's take a look at who's really to blame here.
Let's start with the auto industry. The US is the world leader in auto manufacturing throughout the world. People love our cars.
In the US, the Government has just approved a 25 billion dollar bailout of the auto makers. GM I believe... So, I ask you, why is this? Why are American auto makers struggling to keep up with Toyota? I'll tell you, over regulation, and this is a fact. Liberal Democrats are beholden to the environmentalist lobby in this country. You can start with Al Gore and work your way down the ladder. These idiots have instituted unreasonable CAFE standards on the auto industry, forcing them to make their cars differently here in the States than in the rest of the world. The result is poor sales domestically. The Government is to blame for this. So, sales go down and jobs go away because demand for these cars is lower than it should be. Thank you very much to the Democratic party. Now, that's who's fault it is, this isn't a game of pass the buck, this is the truth.
TThat's just one example. Another example is the Liberals in Washington making it illegal to make, sell, or buy incandescent light bulbs in the US come 2010. Democrats passed this bill to outlaw them, not Republicans. And oh how sweet a deal it is for the CHICOMS because the only place the green bulbs are made thet we're now forced to buy is in China. Again, I want to strees... Liberal environmental Democrats are responsible for this. Say goodbye to jobs anywhere in the US where incandescent light bulbs are made in the US.
Only to be replaced by bulbs full of mercury powder... again, thank you to the Democratic party.
Let me also say this, you cannot disassociate yourself from Unions if you're a labor guy. Labor and Unions are one in the same. That's the way it is and I'll not be told differently. Let's look at how Unions have caused people to lose their jobs. Again, back to GM. Unions strong armed GM into large salaries (That aint a bad thing, btw) but they also negotiated huge pensions, retirement healthcare packages that not only cover the retired worker, but their families too.
This was all fine at the time but times have changed. Since the ridiculous regulations were thrust upon car manufacturers sales have taken a nose dive and GM couldn't do business any longer like it had. People got laid off, major cutbacks were implemented, and now they need help from the Government, all because of your liberal Democratic party.
And lets look at this current debacle we're in, all caused by liberal Democrats. The original brain-child of Jimmy Carter, modified by Bill Clinton, enforced by Janet Reno, mortgage companies were forced to lend money to people who could not pay it back. Minorities, low income people, even illegal aliens were given mortgages to buy homes that they could not pay back. This was done in the name of compassion by liberal Democrats, not Republican. Fannie and Freddy at the time, headed up by Frankin Raines (Who currently works on the Obama Campaign as an economic advisor) Raines made 100 million dollars over 7 years because he kept buying up all these bad loans that weren't getting paid back. They bought so many to inflate their assets on paper, and Raines ended up with huge bonuses, only to be kicked out of there due to all the fraud. Same thing with Jim Johnson, who also happens to be on the Obama economic team. He was booted out of there too due to fraud. Fannie and Freddy were nothing less than a Democratic piggy bank. Chris Dodd took the most money from them, I believe, a ten year period... Obama comes in at #2 in receiving money from them after only three years, then there's Barny Frank, Jamie Gorelick, Chck Schumer, and on and on. Meanwhile, in 2003 Bush called for reforms to F&F, McCain called for reforms in 2005, warning of this exact precise thing. Democrats killed any and all attempts to reform it. Rather, Barny Frank was out there telling everyone there is no problem with F&F, they're fine. Chris Dodd too. Barny Frank, we now just found out, was in a gay relationship with the high ranking member of F&F. The Democratic party was allowing all this scandal and back door favors to happen while getting filthy rich on the backs of tax payers mortgages.
Now, the idea that you only vote based on the voting record of the candidate is either a flat out lie, or, you're just a political hack who would vote for a Democrat no matter who was running, or, you simply aren't aware of what's really going on with this party, Obama included.
There's no way you could vote for Obama based on his voting record because he's been in the Senate only 183 days before he started running for President. He's got no voting record to speak of, he's inexperienced and not qualified to be dog catcher, never mind President. Edited at: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:27:09 PM Edited at: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:31:24 PM Edited at: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:32:59 PM
[ron h] Thursday, September 25, 2008 5:44:16 PM
If there were no bias or clicks or favorites or discrimination or sexual harassment or many, many other things that go on in the workplace then no, there wouldn't be a need. BUT THERE IS!!! Always have been, always will be. If you can put an end to all of that and leave it only up to an individuals' production, then there wouldn't be a need for protection. How many women have been fired for filing a sexual harassment charge? Or even worse, how many women don't file a charge out of fear of being terminated (or worse)? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Thursday, September 25, 2008 5:17:07 PM)
Head banger wrote:
if your a good worker, why do you need protection? who would fire a good worker?
ronhartsell wrote:
Not true. In the Right to Work states, as the one I live in, employers do not even have to have a reason to terminate an employee. So, no, the worker does not have the right to say what he/she wants, there is no standing up for yourself without the risk of being terminated. How just is that?
BLOOD SUCKER Esquire wrote:
Why does your worker need you to speak for him? Can he not speak for himself through his own work? That's what counts.....the work. We speak of downsizing larger governenments in the betterment of the process. And yet, the unions need to maintain their control over the worker. We complain of the government pulling our strings. And yet allow unions to pull the strings of the employee to slow down progress and upward mobility.
You know what brings a worker to the same level as his employer? Hard work and production. THAT is power.
a. Hammerstein
ronhartsell wrote:
Do we actually read posts before posting. I wrote that I vote based on the candidates past voting record. What did I post that makes you post that the union buys this or tells you to do that. It's nowhere in my postings.
I do what I do in my union because I believe in workers rights, fair representation, and having a say in my working conditions. Unions allow workers to do that. A business? As long as there's an IRS, everything is a business. There are costs involved in forming a union. There's rental of space for meetings, travel and training expenses. Let's not kid ourselves here, nothing is free, my friends.
I posted some facts and quotes to support my position, and I have plenty more. All this generalizing just leads me to believe that some postings on this issue is just the same old rhetoric I hear from my bosses.
Please, if we're going to discuss things, then let's just do that.
[Head banger] Thursday, September 25, 2008 5:17:07 PM
if your a good worker, why do you need protection? who would fire a good worker? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Thursday, September 25, 2008 4:30:10 PM)
ronhartsell wrote:
Not true. In the Right to Work states, as the one I live in, employers do not even have to have a reason to terminate an employee. So, no, the worker does not have the right to say what he/she wants, there is no standing up for yourself without the risk of being terminated. How just is that?
BLOOD SUCKER Esquire wrote:
Why does your worker need you to speak for him? Can he not speak for himself through his own work? That's what counts.....the work. We speak of downsizing larger governenments in the betterment of the process. And yet, the unions need to maintain their control over the worker. We complain of the government pulling our strings. And yet allow unions to pull the strings of the employee to slow down progress and upward mobility.
You know what brings a worker to the same level as his employer? Hard work and production. THAT is power.
a. Hammerstein
ronhartsell wrote:
Do we actually read posts before posting. I wrote that I vote based on the candidates past voting record. What did I post that makes you post that the union buys this or tells you to do that. It's nowhere in my postings.
I do what I do in my union because I believe in workers rights, fair representation, and having a say in my working conditions. Unions allow workers to do that. A business? As long as there's an IRS, everything is a business. There are costs involved in forming a union. There's rental of space for meetings, travel and training expenses. Let's not kid ourselves here, nothing is free, my friends.
I posted some facts and quotes to support my position, and I have plenty more. All this generalizing just leads me to believe that some postings on this issue is just the same old rhetoric I hear from my bosses.
Please, if we're going to discuss things, then let's just do that.
[ron h] Thursday, September 25, 2008 4:30:10 PM
Not true. In the Right to Work states, as the one I live in, employers do not even have to have a reason to terminate an employee. So, no, the worker does not have the right to say what he/she wants, there is no standing up for yourself without the risk of being terminated. How just is that? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by BLOOD SUCKER Esquire from Thursday, September 25, 2008 3:40:06 PM)
BLOOD SUCKER Esquire wrote:
Why does your worker need you to speak for him? Can he not speak for himself through his own work? That's what counts.....the work. We speak of downsizing larger governenments in the betterment of the process. And yet, the unions need to maintain their control over the worker. We complain of the government pulling our strings. And yet allow unions to pull the strings of the employee to slow down progress and upward mobility.
You know what brings a worker to the same level as his employer? Hard work and production. THAT is power.
a. Hammerstein
ronhartsell wrote:
Do we actually read posts before posting. I wrote that I vote based on the candidates past voting record. What did I post that makes you post that the union buys this or tells you to do that. It's nowhere in my postings.
I do what I do in my union because I believe in workers rights, fair representation, and having a say in my working conditions. Unions allow workers to do that. A business? As long as there's an IRS, everything is a business. There are costs involved in forming a union. There's rental of space for meetings, travel and training expenses. Let's not kid ourselves here, nothing is free, my friends.
I posted some facts and quotes to support my position, and I have plenty more. All this generalizing just leads me to believe that some postings on this issue is just the same old rhetoric I hear from my bosses.
Please, if we're going to discuss things, then let's just do that.
[BLOOD SUCKER Esquire] Thursday, September 25, 2008 3:40:06 PM
Why does your worker need you to speak for him? Can he not speak for himself through his own work? That's what counts.....the work. We speak of downsizing larger governenments in the betterment of the process. And yet, the unions need to maintain their control over the worker. We complain of the government pulling our strings. And yet allow unions to pull the strings of the employee to slow down progress and upward mobility.
You know what brings a worker to the same level as his employer? Hard work and production. THAT is power.
Do we actually read posts before posting. I wrote that I vote based on the candidates past voting record. What did I post that makes you post that the union buys this or tells you to do that. It's nowhere in my postings.
I do what I do in my union because I believe in workers rights, fair representation, and having a say in my working conditions. Unions allow workers to do that. A business? As long as there's an IRS, everything is a business. There are costs involved in forming a union. There's rental of space for meetings, travel and training expenses. Let's not kid ourselves here, nothing is free, my friends.
I posted some facts and quotes to support my position, and I have plenty more. All this generalizing just leads me to believe that some postings on this issue is just the same old rhetoric I hear from my bosses.
Please, if we're going to discuss things, then let's just do that.