Got issues and concerns regarding Priest...do it here. Keep it out of the other rooms!
You do not have enough Respect Points to post in this topic.
[spapad] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:20:55 PM
Hey, if you don't have the big gap toothed smile to go with it, it would be wasted. Stick to Devil Horns and Priest necklaces for ID, never want to see those garish things on your face! HAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!
Guid at a BeeGee's concert? Parish the thought Vail! I'm getting sick mental images as I type! LMAO! High pitch falcetto and all! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:16:48 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
So you are saying that I shouldn't even try the Elton pose, eh? I HAVE the rings!! LOL!!!
spapad wrote:
Could possibly come in handy at a concert outside if you wear glasses, but DAMN! Your Cred, would go WAY down! LMAO! Those are definately NOT METAL! LOL
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:16:48 PM
So you are saying that I shouldn't even try the Elton pose, eh? I HAVE the rings!! LOL!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:11:35 PM)
spapad wrote:
Could possibly come in handy at a concert outside if you wear glasses, but DAMN! Your Cred, would go WAY down! LMAO! Those are definately NOT METAL! LOL
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:16:25 PM
...And that's why Guido has to take care of his real glasses. Prescription glasses aren't cheap, you know.
I'm sure he can wear the Elton John ones at a Bee Gees concert without getting too many stares. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:11:35 PM)
spapad wrote:
Could possibly come in handy at a concert outside if you wear glasses, but DAMN! Your Cred, would go WAY down! LMAO! Those are definately NOT METAL! LOL
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:14:43 PM
Me? Toothy grin? NEVER!!!
Never could smile for a camera....gave up long ago. Then again, I never did try the "Elton" below. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:09:28 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Wipers would be good (haven't seen too many pics of you with a toothy grin, really). You'll benefit from those wipers alot, especially when it rains.
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, with or without wipers? HAAAAA!!!!
ps. (my teeth are better than Sir Elton's)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[spapad] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:11:35 PM
Could possibly come in handy at a concert outside if you wear glasses, but DAMN! Your Cred, would go WAY down! LMAO! Those are definately NOT METAL! LOL [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:02:27 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:09:28 PM
Wipers would be good (haven't seen too many pics of you with a toothy grin, really). You'll benefit from those wipers alot, especially when it rains.
Ok, with or without wipers? HAAAAA!!!!
ps. (my teeth are better than Sir Elton's)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:05:32 PM
Ok, with or without wipers? HAAAAA!!!!
ps. (my teeth are better than Sir Elton's) [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:02:27 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:02:27 PM
Hmmmm...judging from your pics in the Picture thread, I think you'll look great in some Elton John glasses!!
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:57:51 PM
Near sighted. Oddly enough, the Rx hasn't changed much in 7+ years. Wearing same smushed glasses right now.
Still have to make new ones. What'cha think? Elvis Costello or Elton John? I think I gotta update my look! LOL!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:54:24 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses.
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:54:24 PM
Are you near-sighted or far-sighted? If you're near-sighted, just bring that contact lens closer to you until you can see the shape. If you're far-sighted...then it's time to squint. That and learn to NOT stomp on your glasses. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:48:43 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:48:43 PM
New friggin' contacts. Got 'em yesterday. Now I have to see (while BLIND) if it is inside out or not by a flying saucer shape?!? WTF!!! I wore one of the damn things inside out for HOURS today. Makes driving a lot of fun.....BASTARD DEVIL PIECES OF JELLO!!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 10:50:31 PM
[Head banger] Wednesday, May 13, 2009 7:22:44 AM
where the fuck is the global warming? monday it looks like I need a snow shovel!!!
Well, yeah. But in Picards era, really tight costumes were in. Well, true, for women and men, but I have selective vision, so thats not a problem.
ronhartsell wrote:
I understand...he's too serious for my taste and too many characters with too many problems...the original was lighter and funnier...and mini skirts were in!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Well, if I can allow myself a moments seriousnes here... IDK, but Shatner was never really to my liking. IDK why, maybe its because the first episodes I watched were those with Picard, and he will forever be the true Enterprise captain as far as Im concerned.
ronhartsell wrote:
Nothing beats the original...just ask 'Ripper'...
_strat_ wrote:
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
Picard is hip!
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
[_strat_] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:30:31 PM
I agree. Kirk would be the first to pick up soap in the cube. Not Picard, tho.
Anyway, we Picard loyalists have to stick together. There are Kirk minions everywhere. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Painkiller87 from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:17:03 PM)
Painkiller87 wrote:
I like both Picard and Kirk but I like Picard a lot more because he has a more true captain personality. Plus he got assimilated by the borg and then brought back to normal and lived to fight another day. The Borg are a force to never mess with.
_strat_ wrote:
Well, if I can allow myself a moments seriousnes here... IDK, but Shatner was never really to my liking. IDK why, maybe its because the first episodes I watched were those with Picard, and he will forever be the true Enterprise captain as far as Im concerned.
ronhartsell wrote:
Nothing beats the original...just ask 'Ripper'...
_strat_ wrote:
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
Picard is hip!
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
[_strat_] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:27:24 PM
Well, yeah. But in Picards era, really tight costumes were in. Well, true, for women and men, but I have selective vision, so thats not a problem. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:16:23 PM)
ronhartsell wrote:
I understand...he's too serious for my taste and too many characters with too many problems...the original was lighter and funnier...and mini skirts were in!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Well, if I can allow myself a moments seriousnes here... IDK, but Shatner was never really to my liking. IDK why, maybe its because the first episodes I watched were those with Picard, and he will forever be the true Enterprise captain as far as Im concerned.
ronhartsell wrote:
Nothing beats the original...just ask 'Ripper'...
_strat_ wrote:
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
Picard is hip!
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Remember that comment. It will be laughable to both your children and grandchildren!
Now get THIS song stuck in your head! HAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Well, if I can allow myself a moments seriousnes here... IDK, but Shatner was never really to my liking. IDK why, maybe its because the first episodes I watched were those with Picard, and he will forever be the true Enterprise captain as far as Im concerned.
ronhartsell wrote:
Nothing beats the original...just ask 'Ripper'...
_strat_ wrote:
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
Picard is hip!
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
[Painkiller87] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:17:03 PM
I like both Picard and Kirk but I like Picard a lot more because he has a more true captain personality. Plus he got assimilated by the borg and then brought back to normal and lived to fight another day. The Borg are a force to never mess with. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:12:37 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Well, if I can allow myself a moments seriousnes here... IDK, but Shatner was never really to my liking. IDK why, maybe its because the first episodes I watched were those with Picard, and he will forever be the true Enterprise captain as far as Im concerned.
ronhartsell wrote:
Nothing beats the original...just ask 'Ripper'...
_strat_ wrote:
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
Picard is hip!
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
[ron h] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:16:23 PM
I understand...he's too serious for my taste and too many characters with too many problems...the original was lighter and funnier...and mini skirts were in!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:12:37 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Well, if I can allow myself a moments seriousnes here... IDK, but Shatner was never really to my liking. IDK why, maybe its because the first episodes I watched were those with Picard, and he will forever be the true Enterprise captain as far as Im concerned.
ronhartsell wrote:
Nothing beats the original...just ask 'Ripper'...
_strat_ wrote:
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
Picard is hip!
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:15:38 PM
Remember that comment. It will be laughable to both your children and grandchildren!
Now get THIS song stuck in your head! HAAAAA!!!!!!!
Well, if I can allow myself a moments seriousnes here... IDK, but Shatner was never really to my liking. IDK why, maybe its because the first episodes I watched were those with Picard, and he will forever be the true Enterprise captain as far as Im concerned.
ronhartsell wrote:
Nothing beats the original...just ask 'Ripper'...
_strat_ wrote:
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
Picard is hip!
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
[_strat_] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:12:37 PM
Well, if I can allow myself a moments seriousnes here... IDK, but Shatner was never really to my liking. IDK why, maybe its because the first episodes I watched were those with Picard, and he will forever be the true Enterprise captain as far as Im concerned. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:08:52 PM)
ronhartsell wrote:
Nothing beats the original...just ask 'Ripper'...
_strat_ wrote:
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
Picard is hip!
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
[Painkiller87] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:11:11 PM
Wow, what a way to go, but hey it was definetely the best death scene ever! But still what the heck is up with the one piece?! At least he wasn't wearing a speedo........ [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:04 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
[ron h] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:08:52 PM
Nothing beats the original...just ask 'Ripper'... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:04:57 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
Picard is hip!
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Good man! We gotta keep these young upstarts in check!
ronhartsell wrote:
...mmm...Barbra Eden, deliscious...thanks Guido!! (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:04 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:00:23 PM
[Painkiller87] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:07:14 PM
ROFLCOPTER!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!1 Oh man I am dying over here at work. Wow that was a perfect Trekkie indulgence for the day! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:07:00 PM
BWWWWAHHAAHHAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
I didn't even TRY to mention the other two stellar actors in that scene. One was once a monkey! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:04:57 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
Picard is hip!
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
[Head banger] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:05:42 PM
come on, the janeway stuff was way beter than DS9! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:42:51 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Well, Picard episodes were written before my time, and I watched pretty much everything from Star Trek (excpet that Janeway shit), so I guess it isnt generational...
What I think is really funny about Kirk, tho, is that he is all macho, and strong, and brave, and all ladies probably wanted him... But looking at him now, all dressed up in all those, shiny, tight clothes... Well, I think you know where Im going with this.
ronhartsell wrote:
Oh strat, we are from different generations...I find Kirk to be an interstellar 007 if you will...Picard is nothing more than...well...just nothing...lol
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[_strat_] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:04:57 PM
YAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWNNNNNNNNN.............. Yup, Im a punk kid, I dont have an idea on who the blonde is, and Kirk cant beat Picard... Ever.
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:00:46 PM
Good man! We gotta keep these young upstarts in check! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:59:28 PM)
ronhartsell wrote:
...mmm...Barbra Eden, deliscious...thanks Guido!! (Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:04 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:00:23 PM
[ron h] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:59:28 PM
...mmm...Barbra Eden, deliscious...thanks Guido!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:04 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 5:00:23 PM
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:04 PM
In your DREAMS, buddy!
As the caption says...BEST DEATH EVER! Long live Captain Kirk (and, certainly, anyone but a punk kid could name the blonde). Gotta love the one-piece! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... ¡MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything. How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot. I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh. Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
Edited at: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:55:50 PM
[jimmyjames] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:53:59 PM
He was great in the Airplane movies too.
[ron h] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:46:52 PM
Shatner is a living breathing cartoon...bigger than life itself...the fact that he in no way takes himself seriously is what endears him to most (including myself)... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:42:51 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Well, Picard episodes were written before my time, and I watched pretty much everything from Star Trek (excpet that Janeway shit), so I guess it isnt generational...
What I think is really funny about Kirk, tho, is that he is all macho, and strong, and brave, and all ladies probably wanted him... But looking at him now, all dressed up in all those, shiny, tight clothes... Well, I think you know where Im going with this.
ronhartsell wrote:
Oh strat, we are from different generations...I find Kirk to be an interstellar 007 if you will...Picard is nothing more than...well...just nothing...lol
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[_strat_] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:42:51 PM
Well, Picard episodes were written before my time, and I watched pretty much everything from Star Trek (excpet that Janeway shit), so I guess it isnt generational...
What I think is really funny about Kirk, tho, is that he is all macho, and strong, and brave, and all ladies probably wanted him... But looking at him now, all dressed up in all those, shiny, tight clothes... Well, I think you know where Im going with this. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:38:21 PM)
ronhartsell wrote:
Oh strat, we are from different generations...I find Kirk to be an interstellar 007 if you will...Picard is nothing more than...well...just nothing...lol
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[ron h] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:38:21 PM
Oh strat, we are from different generations...I find Kirk to be an interstellar 007 if you will...Picard is nothing more than...well...just nothing...lol [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
guidogodoy wrote:
HAAAAA!!!!! Sadly, I DO remember the episode.
Painkiller87 wrote:
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one.
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[_strat_] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:27:48 PM
Lmao!!! That was great!! But this is better:
Picard owns Kirk. There, I said it. Feel free to launch a shitstorm my way. The way Kirk is dressed makes me glad that I wasnt around in the 60s.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 4:02:46 PM
LMAO.... HES DEAD JIM,,,,,,, Dont do that to me... Ialmost had my soda come out through my nose. I was laughing so hard
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[Painkiller87] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 2:53:33 PM
Don't forget the outcome "worse than dead" as once uttered by Doctor McCoy in one of the original Star Trek episodes, I don't remember which one. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Monday, May 11, 2009 10:09:52 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done?
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[rockahana] Tuesday, May 12, 2009 2:41:56 PM
My friend was being a complete bitch to me all day, so after a while I was like "What the fuck is wrong with you?" and then she started crying and the girl sitting next to me was like "Hana, how could you say that to her?" ugh.... I can't do anything right
[_strat_] Monday, May 11, 2009 10:12:06 AM
Well, since your offering, Id like a ham, thank you very much. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Monday, May 11, 2009 8:40:45 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I heard EVERY word of THAT!!!!! Old jokes!! God jokes! Deaf jokes. That DOES it!!! Who wants some??? HUH???? Come and get it!!! You want a piece of me???? HUH?? HUH????
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[_strat_] Monday, May 11, 2009 10:09:52 AM
Quite dead? Is that somewhere between totaly dead and medium done? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Darth_Painkiller_0870 from Monday, May 11, 2009 7:25:25 AM)
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[Deep Freeze] Monday, May 11, 2009 8:40:45 AM
RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I heard EVERY word of THAT!!!!! Old jokes!! God jokes! Deaf jokes. That DOES it!!! Who wants some??? HUH???? Come and get it!!! You want a piece of me???? HUH?? HUH????
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Return_of_Darth_Painkiller_0870] Monday, May 11, 2009 7:25:25 AM
Charles Manson is real and he will kill again for me. Lector is fictitious, but Jeffrey Dahmer (Hannibal Lectorwannabe) is quite dead.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this.
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
15th level!!!! Manson (Charles!) is NOT alive!!! I took him ages ago! Youre only seeing a copy/paste gif. animation of him! And Lector is real! You still doubt me?
Damit... I guess thats what happens when we are left unsupervised... The conversation started around movie remakes, now this. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Monday, May 11, 2009 4:21:05 AM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox.....
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[guidogodoy] Monday, May 11, 2009 4:21:05 AM
Marilyn or Charles? Either way, both are real (and still alive). Hannibal Lector was fictitious.
I am truly befuddled by the theories suggested here tonight. Probably because I don't get Fox..... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Monday, May 11, 2009 4:11:57 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion.
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[_strat_] Monday, May 11, 2009 4:11:57 AM
A smartass, eh? Its the 10th level for you, then! And before you start whining, there is a tenth level, and thats where youre going! Say hello to Manson and Lector for me...
There is no newsleter, just a TV station. You probably heard of it before, its called Fox. And Murdoch is nothing but my minion. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Monday, May 11, 2009 4:02:13 AM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information.
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[guidogodoy] Monday, May 11, 2009 4:02:13 AM
Hmmmm....so I would reside in the sixth circle, eh? With the heretics in the City of Dis for not believing in one who claims Genesis to be erroneous.
'Tis a strange religion you advocate. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter for further information. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Monday, May 11, 2009 3:49:26 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before!
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[_strat_] Monday, May 11, 2009 3:49:26 AM
Hey, hey, hey!!! Do not doubt me, or its picking up the soap with the rest of the inmates on the sixth level! All I say is truth, only truth and nothing but truth!
And who said that the genesis is the beginning of everything? You and Freeze date from waaaay before! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Monday, May 11, 2009 3:39:33 AM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[guidogodoy] Monday, May 11, 2009 3:39:33 AM
Yet you are still younger than me, heard Napoleon speak English and have a Dante-like version of inner circles of Hell.
I am just trying to figure out where you went wrong in your education. Religious Studies, History or Math! LOL!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Monday, May 11, 2009 3:34:39 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
guidogodoy wrote:
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[_strat_] Monday, May 11, 2009 3:34:39 AM
Ehm... No. Adam and Eve were cast out, and Freeze got grounded for telling. I should know, I was there too. I got cast to a lake of fire, just for offering them a bite from some tree!
Its all there, in the book of Strat. The bestseller in the lower levels of hell.
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat...
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[guidogodoy] Monday, May 11, 2009 3:27:00 AM
Uhhhh....Adam, Eve, Freeze and his DAD were all around at the same time?! Freeze (or his dad) didn't bite the apple? THEY must still in a state of grace then?
That all must be in the Book of Mormon or something. First Book of Nephi, Book of Jarom, Book of Strat... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Monday, May 11, 2009 3:16:26 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
guidogodoy wrote:
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[_strat_] Monday, May 11, 2009 3:16:26 AM
Im sure. Freeze was the one who came running to his dad, crying "father! Adam and Eve are eating apples and they wont let me have any!!!"
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow?
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[guidogodoy] Monday, May 11, 2009 3:00:54 AM
You sure you aren't confusing me with that Freeze fellow? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Monday, May 11, 2009 1:52:08 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!"
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[_strat_] Monday, May 11, 2009 1:52:08 AM
Of course you dont! You were already 2000 years deaf then! When Jesus said "love thy enemy" you said "Shpeak up, lad, I cant hear ya!" [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:37:07 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[_strat_] Monday, May 11, 2009 1:50:48 AM
Exactly. It demonstrates my mastery of English language, as well as my poetic spirit, all culminated in this one sentence.
Actualy, I stole it from a book, but dont tell! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Sunday, May 10, 2009 7:59:35 PM)
Head banger wrote:
well said
_strat_ wrote:
Nope. Storms rage, waves crash overhead, dumbasses roar, but we just keep paddling on.
Hello to you too! Glad to see you back on.
ronhartsell wrote:
Hi strat and Guido!!! Glad to see nothings changed with you two (lol)...
Nope. Storms rage, waves crash overhead, dumbasses roar, but we just keep paddling on.
Hello to you too! Glad to see you back on.
ronhartsell wrote:
Hi strat and Guido!!! Glad to see nothings changed with you two (lol)...
[Necroticist] Sunday, May 10, 2009 7:54:17 PM
I think i may take a 'time-out' = so pissed off with assholes, liars and cyber-sluts....might be a good option (ppl who matter know where to find me)
[guidogodoy] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:37:07 PM
Odd. I don't remember Napoleon speaking English..... �MENTIROSO! J'ACUSSE!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:24:13 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
guidogodoy wrote:
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[_strat_] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:24:13 PM
Kids? I`ll have you know, when Napoleon said "Charge" I said "Im getting too old for this shit!" Which still makes me a couple of millenia younger than you.
As for the love of animals, I love them more than you. Well, the taste of them, anyway.
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!"
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[guidogodoy] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:20:30 PM
And a rollin' we are!
Good to see you too, Ron! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:06:17 PM)
ronhartsell wrote:
Hi strat and Guido!!! Glad to see nothings changed with you two (lol)...
[guidogodoy] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:19:40 PM
Kids...sheesh. Gotta teach them everything.
How do you flush a pelican? You simply step on his foot.
I also take offense at you calling my love for animals into question. They are gainfully employed. "Eh' it's a livin'!" [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:02:27 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
Oh, and by the way... Ho do you flush a pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[_strat_] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:09:17 PM
Nope. Storms rage, waves crash overhead, dumbasses roar, but we just keep paddling on.
Hello to you too! Glad to see you back on. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ronhartsell from Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:06:17 PM)
ronhartsell wrote:
Hi strat and Guido!!! Glad to see nothings changed with you two (lol)...
[ron h] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:06:17 PM
Hi strat and Guido!!! Glad to see nothings changed with you two (lol)...
[_strat_] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:02:27 PM
Ouch... Mental images!!! Lmao...
And all this from someone I thought of as an animal lover?
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[guidogodoy] Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:00:20 PM
What type of dumb-ass question is THAT?!? How would I know what a pelican toilet feels. They don't speak...duh.
Plus, they'd have their mouths full if they could. HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:43:10 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
For whom? You or the pelican?
guidogodoy wrote:
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[ron h] Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:51:23 PM
LOL...I'm only pissed that it took as long as it has to get back on-line!!!
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[guidogodoy] Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:40:48 PM
No, but that pelican toilet sure takes getting used to...HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!
[Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:19:48 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean.
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[_strat_] Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:19:48 PM
Lol... An old dude is calling an old dude an old dude.
Say Guido, was it a big shock? Going from leg powered to engine powered cars, I mean. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Sunday, May 10, 2009 12:37:51 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[_strat_] Sunday, May 10, 2009 4:18:29 PM
Well, in defense of remakes, if they made them the same as the original, it wouldnt really have a point.
But... I usualy dont like them. The remake of the Planet of the Apes will imo stand as an eternal reminder that remaking classic movies is NOT cool. The original with Charlton Heston was awesome - the remake sucks. Because for all the bad things I could say about Heston, he was still a great actor. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:10:44 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[Deep Freeze] Sunday, May 10, 2009 12:52:24 PM
A LOT you know, DeNunzio!!! Apart from taking in the stray triceratops occasionally, our cave was pet-free..... HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHHAHAHAHAAA!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Sunday, May 10, 2009 12:37:51 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave!
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[guidogodoy] Sunday, May 10, 2009 12:37:51 PM
I bet you were mad with Jurassic Park, too. Didn't look anything CLOSE to the dinosaurs you remember roaming about the cave! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:10:44 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[Deep Freeze] Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:10:44 AM
So here's what is PISSING me off!!!....: WHY is it that EVERYTIME one of these movie guys decides to do a "remake" of a classic TV show (in this case Star Trek), they have to "modernize" it and make it "hip"???????? WHAT??!?!??!?!?!? Why is it that they cannot just make a remake and have it be the same as what made the original so good in the first place?????????? Arrrrggghhh!!!
Now, please do not get me wrong. I am NOT a "Trekkie". Never been to a convention. Don't have the ears. I love the original show because I was a kid when it came out and I actually watched it!! (Same with the original Batman series) ANYWAY, I just read an article that says Captain Kirk is more "hip" in this movie. Apparently, making him a "badboy" is somehow "cool"...? WHATEVER!!!!
The whole cool thing about the original Kirk was his steadfast devotion to duty!! He would NEVER "sneak" aboard a starship!! He served on the Valiant or Reliant or something, for like 12 years before getting command of the Enterprise!! He was not a "loose cannon". He did not ride a friggin motorcycle and look for fights!! He was a Starfleet cadet and one of the FINEST ever. VERY reserved and VERY reliable. BY the book! I just cannot accept that it is "cool" to be a rule breaking troublemaker. Ooops, I forgot..that IS cool these days!! My bad!!
I had planned to go see the movie. I have reconsidered and , at this point, I am no longer interested.
Edited at: Sunday, May 10, 2009 11:13:29 AM
[guidogodoy] Saturday, May 09, 2009 10:24:01 PM
Well, at least those bastards are easier to get OUT of your eyes than getting them in....
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Saturday, May 09, 2009 7:43:59 PM
why do I have this picture inmy head right now..LOL
[Deep Freeze] Saturday, May 09, 2009 7:43:47 PM
BWWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Saturday, May 09, 2009 7:40:15 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
ONE!
Deep Freeze wrote:
HAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAA!!!!! Hey guido!! How many fingers am I holding up???? HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
CONTACT LENSES!!! THEY ARE THE INVENTION OF THE DEVIL HIMSELF!
How the hell do you get them from turning inside out on your finger? How many times poking yourself in the eyeball is too many? For how long should a blind 40 year old man try to find a 321 vs. 123 on a freaking piece of jello?! AAARGH!!!!!
HAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAA!!!!! Hey guido!! How many fingers am I holding up???? HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
CONTACT LENSES!!! THEY ARE THE INVENTION OF THE DEVIL HIMSELF!
How the hell do you get them from turning inside out on your finger? How many times poking yourself in the eyeball is too many? For how long should a blind 40 year old man try to find a 321 vs. 123 on a freaking piece of jello?! AAARGH!!!!!
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Saturday, May 09, 2009 7:40:04 PM
CONTACT LENSES!!! THEY ARE THE INVENTION OF THE DEVIL HIMSELF!
How the hell do you get them from turning inside out on your finger? How many times poking yourself in the eyeball is too many? For how long should a blind 40 year old man try to find a 321 vs. 123 on a freaking piece of jello?! AAARGH!!!!!
[Deep Freeze] Saturday, May 09, 2009 7:38:03 PM
HAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAA!!!!! Hey guido!! How many fingers am I holding up???? HAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Saturday, May 09, 2009 7:34:52 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
CONTACT LENSES!!! THEY ARE THE INVENTION OF THE DEVIL HIMSELF!
How the hell do you get them from turning inside out on your finger? How many times poking yourself in the eyeball is too many? For how long should a blind 40 year old man try to find a 321 vs. 123 on a freaking piece of jello?! AAARGH!!!!!
[guidogodoy] Saturday, May 09, 2009 7:34:52 PM
CONTACT LENSES!!! THEY ARE THE INVENTION OF THE DEVIL HIMSELF!
How the hell do you get them from turning inside out on your finger? How many times poking yourself in the eyeball is too many? For how long should a blind 40 year old man try to find a 321 vs. 123 on a freaking piece of jello?! AAARGH!!!!!
[J.D. DIAMOND] Friday, May 08, 2009 10:25:56 PM
You want to know something else,it does'nt "piss me off" but this is the right place to post it....
"Murray" should give this place a "moderator" to sort out all these lame people using false accounts like Darryn Heloffs..ect...and simply "ban" them.
If Murray does'nt have the time to do it,then he should request one...for the sake of this forum,the band's reputation and the integrity of our thoughts and posts.
I find it 'sad" that this place "still" does'nt have a moderator.If there was one,these childish things would not fly in here...the assholes trying to stir shit up in here would be banned without question.
So the question presents itself: "MURRAY".......where are you????
J.D(THE COMMANDER)DIAMOND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Edited at: Friday, May 08, 2009 10:26:15 PM
[Necroticist] Friday, May 08, 2009 6:34:19 PM
Today? Just ppl who don't listen to 2 sides of a story and get the hump, ppl not realising that alcohol is a problem with me (but i'm doing my best), others who get to use alternate nicks (whereas i have asked to have other accounts removed) - not much really....
[Head banger] Friday, May 08, 2009 5:35:21 PM
if they ever come this way again, hope its just them!!! give me a huge long set, or 2!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by hellrider 31038 from Thursday, May 07, 2009 11:38:56 PM)
hellrider 31038 wrote:
record label FU?K bring on the heavy metal.definatly NOT looking forward to both opening bands.well wont have to rush to the show after work.last year rushed so wouldt miss motorhead but this year besides for meeting some of the TOTALLY AWESOME MEMBERS (FRIENDS) HERE i have no reason to rush to the show
Head banger wrote:
perhaps the record lable forced them into it???
guidogodoy wrote:
POPEVIL? I am from friggin' Michigan and I have never heard of this no-name band. They were a no-name God-band before the change of name, so it seems. Just cut an album?! Ummm...played CANTON, MI?! No offense as I have been there many a time as it is the hometown of one of my good friends but pull out a map and laugh when you see it. Perhaps they wanted to go to the Novi mall after?! Seem to have never even played Detroit and now they are on the ticket with Priest. Good googly goo.
The person who thought of that smooth move should be drawn and quartered with their parts burned then scattered across the four corners of the Earth. Guess I'll be missing them a few times this summer while waiting for Priest.
NOT Kardashians....;)
ONE!