Got issues and concerns regarding Priest...do it here. Keep it out of the other rooms!
You do not have enough Respect Points to post in this topic.
[Head banger] Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:23:22 AM
currently pissing me off.
wind
work
[Head banger] Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:21:58 AM
you will webcast this too me? my fee including travel may bankrupt you. as an expert, my opinion is quite expensive. capitalism you know. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:25:46 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[Head banger] Thursday, March 05, 2009 7:25:32 AM
apparently thats comon in asia. also butock implants???? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:15:18 PM)
spapad wrote:
Oh yuck, Ladies could you imagine going out with a guy and finding out he had Pec implants! ........NO!!! Gross!
[Return_of_Darth_Painkiller_0870] Thursday, March 05, 2009 5:30:18 AM
And where is Deep Duck? He's usually on by now.
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:23:22 AM
A bewitched log? You think if a princess gives him a kiss that he will then turn into a duck/swan?
We should perform the experiment with and without the pool cover, and compare the results.
HAAAAA!!!! A SWAN!!?? I would guess a log to be more accurate were he to actually float. A bewitched log at that.
My money is still on him dropping like a stone off my diving board. Granted, I have no children so should not expect to have my children's children affected much but, hey, I just want to kick the guy into my pool for a laugh (er, um...I mean "experiment")! I may or may not take off the pool cover.
_strat_ wrote:
Now, now, no more about bets. This is a serious scientific experiment.
The duck possibility has to be considered. Also, he could be a swan, or just a log. In any case, we have to take into consideration his overall body density, and compare it to that of water, because that determines wheter or not he will float. But, enough theory, we need to try it out for real. He wont like it, Im sure, but hey... Sacrifices are neccesary when it comes to such scientific breakthroughs as this one. The future of our children, and our childrens children may well depend on wheter Freeze will float or sink.
guidogodoy wrote:
You're on!
Of course you realize that if he were to float it also could mean he was a duck.....LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation.
guidogodoy wrote:
It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:18:48 AM
HAAAAA!!!! A SWAN!!?? I would guess a log to be more accurate were he to actually float. A bewitched log at that.
My money is still on him dropping like a stone off my diving board. Granted, I have no children so should not expect to have my children's children affected much but, hey, I just want to kick the guy into my pool for a laugh (er, um...I mean "experiment")! I may or may not take off the pool cover. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:06:59 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Now, now, no more about bets. This is a serious scientific experiment.
The duck possibility has to be considered. Also, he could be a swan, or just a log. In any case, we have to take into consideration his overall body density, and compare it to that of water, because that determines wheter or not he will float. But, enough theory, we need to try it out for real. He wont like it, Im sure, but hey... Sacrifices are neccesary when it comes to such scientific breakthroughs as this one. The future of our children, and our childrens children may well depend on wheter Freeze will float or sink.
guidogodoy wrote:
You're on!
Of course you realize that if he were to float it also could mean he was a duck.....LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation.
guidogodoy wrote:
It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:06:59 AM
Now, now, no more about bets. This is a serious scientific experiment.
The duck possibility has to be considered. Also, he could be a swan, or just a log. In any case, we have to take into consideration his overall body density, and compare it to that of water, because that determines wheter or not he will float. But, enough theory, we need to try it out for real. He wont like it, Im sure, but hey... Sacrifices are neccesary when it comes to such scientific breakthroughs as this one. The future of our children, and our childrens children may well depend on wheter Freeze will float or sink. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:57:33 AM)
guidogodoy wrote:
You're on!
Of course you realize that if he were to float it also could mean he was a duck.....LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation.
guidogodoy wrote:
It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:57:33 AM
You're on!
Of course you realize that if he were to float it also could mean he was a duck.....LOL!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:48:29 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation.
guidogodoy wrote:
It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:48:29 AM
I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:45:26 AM)
guidogodoy wrote:
It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:45:26 AM
It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
In any case... What if he doesnt float? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:26:36 AM)
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...) [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:05:51 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:05:51 AM
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:42:39 AM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:42:39 AM
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:25:46 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:25:46 AM
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:12:51 AM)
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:12:51 AM
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:51 PM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
LOL ... In that case, I think the football players woulda had half a chance if they had Bev along!
I'm off 'til later as well. Thanks for the laughs, gang! Cheers
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:16:00 PM
LOL ... In that case, I think the football players woulda had half a chance if they had Bev along!
I'm off 'til later as well. Thanks for the laughs, gang! Cheers [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:51 PM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
[spapad] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:15:18 PM
Oh yuck, Ladies could you imagine going out with a guy and finding out he had Pec implants! ........NO!!! Gross!
[spapad] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:51 PM
Yeah right! I guess all she wanted for Christmas was a sexy bra for Gramps! LOL [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:02 PM)
Bev wrote:
That's me, spa!!!
spapad wrote:
Hey!............What's going on!? ..............Who posted My Mother!!!
[Deep Freeze] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:51 PM
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:07:56 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:07:15 PM
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:02:06 PM
NO!!!! Personally, I am disgusted by them. If I wanted a barbie doll, I'd buy one.
Plus, a grandma with DDs is just plain and wrong.
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:00:13 PM
LOL
... you guys stop makin' me cry; I'm half way to grandma ((sniff, sniff)) [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:57:39 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
NO!!!! Personally, I am disgusted by them. If I wanted a barbie doll, I'd buy one.
Plus, a grandma with DDs is just plain and wrong.
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
... mmm ... Man Whores!!! Equal Employment Opportunity, all shapes and sizes, physically / mentally challenged - no problem, no glass ceiling in this industry. All applicants welcome ... MEOW
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:57:39 PM
NO!!!! Personally, I am disgusted by them. If I wanted a barbie doll, I'd buy one.
Plus, a grandma with DDs is just plain and wrong. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:49:06 PM)
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:56:53 PM
... mmm ... Man Whores!!! Equal Employment Opportunity, all shapes and sizes, physically / mentally challenged - no problem, no glass ceiling in this industry. All applicants welcome ... MEOW
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Deep Freeze] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:55:51 PM
BWWWWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by MG_Metalgoddess from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:51:29 PM)
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:55:33 PM
... mmm ... Man Whores!!! Equal Employment Opportunity, all shapes and sizes, physically / mentally challenged - no problem, no glass ceiling in this industry. All applicants welcome ... MEOW
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:55:08 PM
its just a word, could have used prostitution, but spelling and typing....
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:54:45 PM
... mmm ... Man Whores!!! Equal Employment Opportunity, all shapes and sizes, physically / mentally challenged - no problem, no glass ceiling in this industry. All applicants welcome ... MEOW [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by MG_Metalgoddess from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:51:29 PM)
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:51:29 PM
Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:49:06 PM
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by MG_Metalgoddess from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:43:36 PM)
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:43:36 PM
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job..... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:41:49 PM)
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:41:49 PM
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:16:29 PM)
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Deep Freeze] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:26:47 PM
HAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:39:42 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Freeze, George Carlin just called from up there (yes, there is "up there" and hes feeling like a total jerk). He wants his royalties, or else Joe Pesci will come round your place with a baseball bat.
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:40:58 PM
no, since its not popular, the cause can continue for years. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:19:55 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
You really did it? A pro government stance? First Freeze, now you... Next thing will be me saying that capitalism isnt so bad after all...
And sex isnt something I would rally against, if thats what you mean.
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:19:55 PM
You really did it? A pro government stance? First Freeze, now you... Next thing will be me saying that capitalism isnt so bad after all...
And sex isnt something I would rally against, if thats what you mean. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:16:29 PM)
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:16:29 PM
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:11:05 PM)
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:11:39 PM
No, Im suggesting that the solution to the AIDS problem is less pleasant than solutions to other problems.
As for prostitution, I agree. I think that the Dutch have it the right way. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:05:03 PM)
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:11:05 PM
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:05:03 PM)
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:05:03 PM
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:37:57 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:39:42 PM
Freeze, George Carlin just called from up there (yes, there is "up there" and hes feeling like a total jerk). He wants his royalties, or else Joe Pesci will come round your place with a baseball bat. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:32:34 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:37:57 PM
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:31:49 PM)
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:37:54 PM
Can you imagine how many meals all the money johns spend on hookers could buy? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by METAL MELTDOWN from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:31:51 PM)
METAL MELTDOWN wrote:
My heart is not bleeding for the children abroad but for the children on our neck of the forest but I think it could be that a child cannot fend for itself where as the 20 something hooker can...
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[METAL MELTDOWN] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:31:51 PM
My heart is not bleeding for the children abroad but for the children on our neck of the forest but I think it could be that a child cannot fend for itself where as the 20 something hooker can... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:32:34 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:31:49 PM
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids.... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:32:34 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bazookajoe_666] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:41:16 AM
It's pissing me off that school is boring as shit BUT I made a deal with myself not to skip anymore for a while and go to class.
[Deep Freeze] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:32:34 AM
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 7:16:31 AM
hais or nipples. after 6miles, nipples would be the least of my wories. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:20:03 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair.
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
[Vaillant 3.0] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:46:20 PM
Do you WAANT to come back to my place, bouncy bouncy! I am no longer infected. (Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:27:31 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Pfffff...after running that much, my nipples would be the least of my problems. They would probably come after the heart-attack I'll definitely suffer (along with my already-shin-splinted left leg).
guidogodoy wrote:
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair.
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:42:32 PM
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:39:10 PM
My nipples explode with delight!
Do you WAANT to come back to my place, bouncy bouncy! I am no longer infected. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:27:31 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Pfffff...after running that much, my nipples would be the least of my problems. They would probably come after the heart-attack I'll definitely suffer (along with my already-shin-splinted left leg).
guidogodoy wrote:
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair.
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:42:32 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:27:31 PM
Pfffff...after running that much, my nipples would be the least of my problems. They would probably come after the heart-attack I'll definitely suffer (along with my already-shin-splinted left leg). [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:20:03 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair.
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:25:03 PM
You know, I didn't like that movie. I own it and LOVED "Shawn of the Dead" but that was just too goofy.
Had promise but devolved into a chick-flick, nonsense "hit too close to home" film. Anyone who runs marathons would understand just how bad that movie was. Like either could get to the "elite" group. She WAS a hottie, though.... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by devils_child from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:38:44 PM)
devils_child wrote:
Vaseline?.... Isn't that what the guy used in Run Fatboy Run?..... Or you can run shirtless... that would be easier.... and ....sexier.....
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:20:03 PM
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair.
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
[Vaillant 3.0] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:48:38 PM
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:34:16 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
[devils_child] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:38:44 PM
Vaseline?.... Isn't that what the guy used in Run Fatboy Run?..... Or you can run shirtless... that would be easier.... and ....sexier..... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:34:16 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:34:16 PM
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
[Head banger] Friday, February 27, 2009 12:18:43 PM
everytime I put metalica on to play in my office I get called out, come back and st anger is playing.
[Everleigh] Tuesday, February 24, 2009 6:33:09 AM
I am having the same issure with trying to post on the "Q"..... I can log in without any problem but just can't post any comments or pics. I have e-mailed the webmaster, but never got a response... HELP!!
[adrianaec_88] Monday, February 23, 2009 8:04:13 PM
the Q admin
you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons.....
[adrianaec_88] Monday, February 23, 2009 8:04:12 PM
the Q admin
you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons.....
[Head banger] Saturday, February 21, 2009 11:29:44 AM
government created forms. argh
that and poor record keeping
[paorcamp] Friday, February 20, 2009 7:57:12 PM
cancer de mama is a very good one too... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by adrianaec_88 from Friday, February 20, 2009 7:55:06 PM)
adrianaec_88 wrote:
akasha? haven't heard of them.. I'm listening mantra on youtube right now, yep I listen more music in english too..
paorcamp wrote:
yes...I've heard them...Rata blanca is very popular here...akasha is another one(one of the best by the way),mantra,insano,acero,shakra,askatazuna,garbanzos,percance,totem...y por ahi otras que no me acuerdo...sinceramente oigo mas musica en ingles
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I'd love to hear them.. tell me some names...
Have you heard Rata Blanca / Walter Giardino o Hermetica?
paorcamp wrote:
gracias!!!you're right...but they don't think so...actually we have many good metal bands...recognized in the many countries...and they are very good at playing our favorite music...
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I believe Central America has many metalheads paor !!!!!
paorcamp wrote:
no band wants to come because they think that central america worships reggaeton and other local music...BUT THAT'S NOT TRUE!!! ASK MAIDEN!!!!!!THAT'S WHY THEY'RE COMIN' AGAIN!!!
Becks wrote:
More bands are starting to come but they often skip us
[adrianaec_88] Friday, February 20, 2009 7:55:06 PM
akasha? haven't heard of them.. I'm listening mantra on youtube right now, yep I listen more music in english too.. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by paorcamp from Friday, February 20, 2009 7:47:36 PM)
paorcamp wrote:
yes...I've heard them...Rata blanca is very popular here...akasha is another one(one of the best by the way),mantra,insano,acero,shakra,askatazuna,garbanzos,percance,totem...y por ahi otras que no me acuerdo...sinceramente oigo mas musica en ingles
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I'd love to hear them.. tell me some names...
Have you heard Rata Blanca / Walter Giardino o Hermetica?
paorcamp wrote:
gracias!!!you're right...but they don't think so...actually we have many good metal bands...recognized in the many countries...and they are very good at playing our favorite music...
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I believe Central America has many metalheads paor !!!!!
paorcamp wrote:
no band wants to come because they think that central america worships reggaeton and other local music...BUT THAT'S NOT TRUE!!! ASK MAIDEN!!!!!!THAT'S WHY THEY'RE COMIN' AGAIN!!!
Becks wrote:
More bands are starting to come but they often skip us
[paorcamp] Friday, February 20, 2009 7:47:36 PM
yes...I've heard them...Rata blanca is very popular here...akasha is another one(one of the best by the way),mantra,insano,acero,shakra,askatazuna,garbanzos,percance,totem...y por ahi otras que no me acuerdo...sinceramente oigo mas musica en ingles [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by adrianaec_88 from Friday, February 20, 2009 7:30:27 PM)
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I'd love to hear them.. tell me some names...
Have you heard Rata Blanca / Walter Giardino o Hermetica?
paorcamp wrote:
gracias!!!you're right...but they don't think so...actually we have many good metal bands...recognized in the many countries...and they are very good at playing our favorite music...
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I believe Central America has many metalheads paor !!!!!
paorcamp wrote:
no band wants to come because they think that central america worships reggaeton and other local music...BUT THAT'S NOT TRUE!!! ASK MAIDEN!!!!!!THAT'S WHY THEY'RE COMIN' AGAIN!!!
Becks wrote:
More bands are starting to come but they often skip us
[adrianaec_88] Friday, February 20, 2009 7:30:27 PM
I'd love to hear them.. tell me some names...
Have you heard Rata Blanca / Walter Giardino o Hermetica? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by paorcamp from Friday, February 20, 2009 7:25:48 PM)
paorcamp wrote:
gracias!!!you're right...but they don't think so...actually we have many good metal bands...recognized in the many countries...and they are very good at playing our favorite music...
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I believe Central America has many metalheads paor !!!!!
paorcamp wrote:
no band wants to come because they think that central america worships reggaeton and other local music...BUT THAT'S NOT TRUE!!! ASK MAIDEN!!!!!!THAT'S WHY THEY'RE COMIN' AGAIN!!!
Becks wrote:
More bands are starting to come but they often skip us
[paorcamp] Friday, February 20, 2009 7:25:48 PM
gracias!!!you're right...but they don't think so...actually we have many good metal bands...recognized in the many countries...and they are very good at playing our favorite music... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by adrianaec_88 from Friday, February 20, 2009 7:23:08 PM)
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I believe Central America has many metalheads paor !!!!!
paorcamp wrote:
no band wants to come because they think that central america worships reggaeton and other local music...BUT THAT'S NOT TRUE!!! ASK MAIDEN!!!!!!THAT'S WHY THEY'RE COMIN' AGAIN!!!
Becks wrote:
More bands are starting to come but they often skip us
[adrianaec_88] Friday, February 20, 2009 7:23:08 PM
I believe Central America has many metalheads paor !!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by paorcamp from Friday, February 20, 2009 7:15:39 PM)
paorcamp wrote:
no band wants to come because they think that central america worships reggaeton and other local music...BUT THAT'S NOT TRUE!!! ASK MAIDEN!!!!!!THAT'S WHY THEY'RE COMIN' AGAIN!!!
Becks wrote:
More bands are starting to come but they often skip us
[adrianaec_88] Friday, February 20, 2009 7:21:16 PM
Duely noted Adrian! I will send that off to Jeanine, the keeper of the birthdays, but my guess is she already knows.
adrianaec_88 wrote:
haha thanks spapad! mine is on 3rd July
spapad wrote:
Is it you Birthday party Adrian? Tell us! We need to add you to the B-day list!
adrianaec_88 wrote:
thanks paor....hahaha I'm not going out tonight, tomorrow I will have a birthday party.... hey maiden is coming on march too.. I have to hurry and get those tickets as soon as possible.. they are coming on a rock fest along with Kiss
paorcamp wrote:
Be strong my friend...enjoy your time of loneliness(or whatever the word is)...get wild toninght haha...I'm going to see maiden too!!enjoy it!!!!!I already got my ticket because they'll be here in march...
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I'm not pisssed of but I feel like crap.... my boyfriend just called me from Brazil, and I'm already starting to miss him ..besides today and on suday Deep Purple is playing and I can't go because I have to save money to see Maiden.....
[paorcamp] Friday, February 20, 2009 7:15:39 PM
no band wants to come because they think that central america worships reggaeton and other local music...BUT THAT'S NOT TRUE!!! ASK MAIDEN!!!!!!THAT'S WHY THEY'RE COMIN' AGAIN!!!
More bands are starting to come but they often skip us
[Becks] Friday, February 20, 2009 7:12:58 PM
More bands are starting to come but they often skip us
[spapad] Friday, February 20, 2009 7:11:59 PM
Duely noted Adrian! I will send that off to Jeanine, the keeper of the birthdays, but my guess is she already knows. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by adrianaec_88 from Friday, February 20, 2009 7:04:48 PM)
adrianaec_88 wrote:
haha thanks spapad! mine is on 3rd July
spapad wrote:
Is it you Birthday party Adrian? Tell us! We need to add you to the B-day list!
adrianaec_88 wrote:
thanks paor....hahaha I'm not going out tonight, tomorrow I will have a birthday party.... hey maiden is coming on march too.. I have to hurry and get those tickets as soon as possible.. they are coming on a rock fest along with Kiss
paorcamp wrote:
Be strong my friend...enjoy your time of loneliness(or whatever the word is)...get wild toninght haha...I'm going to see maiden too!!enjoy it!!!!!I already got my ticket because they'll be here in march...
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I'm not pisssed of but I feel like crap.... my boyfriend just called me from Brazil, and I'm already starting to miss him ..besides today and on suday Deep Purple is playing and I can't go because I have to save money to see Maiden.....
[adrianaec_88] Friday, February 20, 2009 7:08:52 PM
poar, becks.... is that so? God I would hate to hear that other bands are coming to many countries except mine.... well I know in some festivals that we have here some people comes from the foreign.. The first one I remember is when I saw Motley Crue last year I saw lots of brasilian there
[adrianaec_88] Friday, February 20, 2009 7:04:48 PM
haha thanks spapad! mine is on 3rd July [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Friday, February 20, 2009 7:02:15 PM)
spapad wrote:
Is it you Birthday party Adrian? Tell us! We need to add you to the B-day list!
adrianaec_88 wrote:
thanks paor....hahaha I'm not going out tonight, tomorrow I will have a birthday party.... hey maiden is coming on march too.. I have to hurry and get those tickets as soon as possible.. they are coming on a rock fest along with Kiss
paorcamp wrote:
Be strong my friend...enjoy your time of loneliness(or whatever the word is)...get wild toninght haha...I'm going to see maiden too!!enjoy it!!!!!I already got my ticket because they'll be here in march...
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I'm not pisssed of but I feel like crap.... my boyfriend just called me from Brazil, and I'm already starting to miss him ..besides today and on suday Deep Purple is playing and I can't go because I have to save money to see Maiden.....
[spapad] Friday, February 20, 2009 7:02:15 PM
Is it you Birthday party Adrian? Tell us! We need to add you to the B-day list! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by adrianaec_88 from Friday, February 20, 2009 6:53:02 PM)
adrianaec_88 wrote:
thanks paor....hahaha I'm not going out tonight, tomorrow I will have a birthday party.... hey maiden is coming on march too.. I have to hurry and get those tickets as soon as possible.. they are coming on a rock fest along with Kiss
paorcamp wrote:
Be strong my friend...enjoy your time of loneliness(or whatever the word is)...get wild toninght haha...I'm going to see maiden too!!enjoy it!!!!!I already got my ticket because they'll be here in march...
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I'm not pisssed of but I feel like crap.... my boyfriend just called me from Brazil, and I'm already starting to miss him ..besides today and on suday Deep Purple is playing and I can't go because I have to save money to see Maiden.....
[paorcamp] Friday, February 20, 2009 6:56:17 PM
you're so lucky...we are having maiden here for the second time...previously Slayer came some years ago....and only these two bands in our whole history... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by adrianaec_88 from Friday, February 20, 2009 6:53:02 PM)
adrianaec_88 wrote:
thanks paor....hahaha I'm not going out tonight, tomorrow I will have a birthday party.... hey maiden is coming on march too.. I have to hurry and get those tickets as soon as possible.. they are coming on a rock fest along with Kiss
paorcamp wrote:
Be strong my friend...enjoy your time of loneliness(or whatever the word is)...get wild toninght haha...I'm going to see maiden too!!enjoy it!!!!!I already got my ticket because they'll be here in march...
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I'm not pisssed of but I feel like crap.... my boyfriend just called me from Brazil, and I'm already starting to miss him ..besides today and on suday Deep Purple is playing and I can't go because I have to save money to see Maiden.....
[adrianaec_88] Friday, February 20, 2009 6:53:02 PM
thanks paor....hahaha I'm not going out tonight, tomorrow I will have a birthday party.... hey maiden is coming on march too.. I have to hurry and get those tickets as soon as possible.. they are coming on a rock fest along with Kiss [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by paorcamp from Friday, February 20, 2009 6:47:24 PM)
paorcamp wrote:
Be strong my friend...enjoy your time of loneliness(or whatever the word is)...get wild toninght haha...I'm going to see maiden too!!enjoy it!!!!!I already got my ticket because they'll be here in march...
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I'm not pisssed of but I feel like crap.... my boyfriend just called me from Brazil, and I'm already starting to miss him ..besides today and on suday Deep Purple is playing and I can't go because I have to save money to see Maiden.....
[Becks] Friday, February 20, 2009 6:52:15 PM
Bands rarely come to New Zealand too. Like I've mentioned before, Priest cancelled their first ever concert here due to logistics reasons (some people say low ticket sales but I doubt that, if it was they would have said so lol). Fingers crossed they stop by at some point :)
[adrianaec_88] Friday, February 20, 2009 6:50:37 PM
thanks Becks.. I know it sucks when you can't go see a band.... why do they always have to come in the same moment of the year.... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Becks from Friday, February 20, 2009 6:46:40 PM)
Becks wrote:
Hugs Adri It's hard when they go away, but you'll be fine.
Maiden is in NZ at the moment and I can't go waaaaaaaah. Oh well they said it definitely won't be 16 years before they're back again yay!
[paorcamp] Friday, February 20, 2009 6:47:24 PM
Be strong my friend...enjoy your time of loneliness(or whatever the word is)...get wild toninght haha...I'm going to see maiden too!!enjoy it!!!!!I already got my ticket because they'll be here in march... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by adrianaec_88 from Friday, February 20, 2009 6:44:02 PM)
adrianaec_88 wrote:
I'm not pisssed of but I feel like crap.... my boyfriend just called me from Brazil, and I'm already starting to miss him ..besides today and on suday Deep Purple is playing and I can't go because I have to save money to see Maiden.....
[Becks] Friday, February 20, 2009 6:46:40 PM
Hugs Adri It's hard when they go away, but you'll be fine.
Maiden is in NZ at the moment and I can't go waaaaaaaah. Oh well they said it definitely won't be 16 years before they're back again yay!
[adrianaec_88] Friday, February 20, 2009 6:44:02 PM
I'm not pisssed of but I feel like crap.... my boyfriend just called me from Brazil, and I'm already starting to miss him ..besides today and on suday Deep Purple is playing and I can't go because I have to save money to see Maiden.....
[_strat_] Friday, February 20, 2009 5:19:56 AM
Well, its an age old fact that alcohol and communicative skills are very connected... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Darth_Painkiller_0870 from Friday, February 20, 2009 5:15:21 AM)
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Okay, this didn't piss me off but I was kinda annoyed by it. That Metal Show - which is hosted by Eddie Trunk on VH1 Classic, had Ace Frehley on back in December. I watched the show last night and for as much as I love the Space Ace, he's a lame guest when he's sober. Dude has nothing much to say.
[Return_of_Darth_Painkiller_0870] Friday, February 20, 2009 5:15:21 AM
Okay, this didn't piss me off but I was kinda annoyed by it. That Metal Show - which is hosted by Eddie Trunk on VH1 Classic, had Ace Frehley on back in December. I watched the show last night and for as much as I love the Space Ace, he's a lame guest when he's sober. Dude has nothing much to say.
[devils_child] Thursday, February 19, 2009 6:26:47 PM
It's like when they ban an image on photobucket.... It's not like we stand to gain any money from posting pics or videos. It's all free sharing.... Stupid pricks... It's free fricken advertisement for their music or whatever... If i didn't have youtube i wouldn't have dicovered at least a 1/3 of my musical taste....
yep copyright is pissing me off.. they banned 2 vids from my account a high quality vid of Sad But True and another of Skid Row on SNL
spapad wrote:
Alot of the really good ones have copyright infridgement problems, so they don't stay around very long.
adrianaec_88 wrote:
they bannned another vid I uploaded in youtube.. violations of terms of use (ha!)
[Before The Rage] Thursday, February 19, 2009 2:20:01 PM
What pisses me off... yesterday, I found my checking account overdrafted, thanks to my car insurance company, with whom I terminated my policy on Sunday. Their automated system still withdrew $251.64 from my account two days later even though I only had $58 in it. Even worse, I made several small purchases last week (the end balance after these purchases was $58), but they didn't show up on my statement until the 17th, AFTER it was overdrafted. So I'm being charged 6 overdraft fees of $22, adding up to $132. It's BS because only my insurance overdrafted my account. I've dealt with them and they're sending me a check in the mail. Now I just have to deal with the bank...
[Return_of_Darth_Painkiller_0870] Thursday, February 19, 2009 6:11:57 AM
Freeze, stay strong my friend!
[_strat_] Thursday, February 19, 2009 1:35:06 AM
Well, Im sure there are still things that can be done... I find it hard to believe that modern medicine cant do anything else than what has already been done.
Oh, and I agree with the rest - Youtube is a big bunch of assholes. I want Billy Bragg videos back! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, February 18, 2009 11:05:23 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
"Live with it", basically. There is not much that can be done as I already had the surgery. There is not much more modern medicine can do for me, unfortunately. I do appreciate all the kindness. You are all very comforting, I can assure you.
_strat_ wrote:
What does the doctor say?
Deep Freeze wrote:
HA!! Thank you , Ron. I wish it were that simple. I fear I am slowly heading into a very bad situation. My medication does not seem to be working and I have a myriad of problems develpoing. Truly miserable.
ronhartsell wrote:
I feel your pain DF...I've been sick since Friday and yesterday was the first day I was able to breath without 'dripping' all over the place...my ribs are so sore from the pressure built up in my lungs, they still hurt pretty bad...and the pressure in my head is slowly going away...hopefully you'll be feeling better soon!!!
Deep Freeze wrote:
I am so SICK of being SICK. I cannot sleep. I cannot sit quietly. I feel like garbage most of the time. I just spent this last evening thrashing about in bed, unable to get to sleep. That sickly feeling coming in wave after wave. The pain in my back screaming at me. I roll to one side, then the other.. I am hot. I am cold. I ache. I have had it with this. It is the most miserable feeling I have evet known.
[adrianaec_88] Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:53:05 PM
yep copyright is pissing me off.. they banned 2 vids from my account a high quality vid of Sad But True and another of Skid Row on SNL [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:49:13 PM)
spapad wrote:
Alot of the really good ones have copyright infridgement problems, so they don't stay around very long.
adrianaec_88 wrote:
they bannned another vid I uploaded in youtube.. violations of terms of use (ha!)
[spapad] Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:49:13 PM
Alot of the really good ones have copyright infridgement problems, so they don't stay around very long. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by adrianaec_88 from Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:40:31 PM)
adrianaec_88 wrote:
they bannned another vid I uploaded in youtube.. violations of terms of use (ha!)
[devils_child] Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:45:47 PM
Fricken youtube buttholes....
SOrry to hear about it Freeze, Hopefully you will find something to ease it (I know you've probably exhausted all options) But you never know what may happen! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by adrianaec_88 from Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:40:31 PM)
adrianaec_88 wrote:
they bannned another vid I uploaded in youtube.. violations of terms of use (ha!)
[adrianaec_88] Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:40:31 PM
they bannned another vid I uploaded in youtube.. violations of terms of use (ha!)
[adrianaec_88] Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:38:55 PM
Freeze so sorry to hear that, my best wishes amigo. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, February 18, 2009 8:00:36 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
HA!! Thank you , Ron. I wish it were that simple. I fear I am slowly heading into a very bad situation. My medication does not seem to be working and I have a myriad of problems develpoing. Truly miserable.
ronhartsell wrote:
I feel your pain DF...I've been sick since Friday and yesterday was the first day I was able to breath without 'dripping' all over the place...my ribs are so sore from the pressure built up in my lungs, they still hurt pretty bad...and the pressure in my head is slowly going away...hopefully you'll be feeling better soon!!!
Deep Freeze wrote:
I am so SICK of being SICK. I cannot sleep. I cannot sit quietly. I feel like garbage most of the time. I just spent this last evening thrashing about in bed, unable to get to sleep. That sickly feeling coming in wave after wave. The pain in my back screaming at me. I roll to one side, then the other.. I am hot. I am cold. I ache. I have had it with this. It is the most miserable feeling I have evet known.
[Becks] Wednesday, February 18, 2009 4:15:29 PM
I'm sorry to hear you're not well, DF, I hope there is light at the end of the tunnel for you!
Ok so what's pissing me off? My Judas Priest shirt appears to have gotten lost in the post took me forever to find a female style shirt here in NZ, and now the postal service has gone and screwed up, I'm still waiting for it. The person I bought it from is very helpful and has sent off a form to find out what has happened to it. I just want my JP shirt!!!!!!!!!!
I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!! 
All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ... 
... stop teasing (ah, take me back a few years) 
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
I appreciate it 
..besides today and on suday Deep Purple is playing and I can't go because I have to save money to see Maiden.....
they banned 2 vids from my account a high quality vid of Sad But True and another of Skid Row on SNL 
