Got issues and concerns regarding Priest...do it here. Keep it out of the other rooms!
You do not have enough Respect Points to post in this topic.
[Vaillant 3.0] Saturday, March 14, 2009 10:41:48 AM
I'm somewhat pissed off that I'm up this early and can't get back to bed.
[J.D. DIAMOND] Saturday, March 14, 2009 3:25:01 AM
HA HA...you've hit it right on the head Darth!! It is "JEALOUSY". But don't let it "piss you off".....those worthless individuals can't reveal themselves...who they really are because of "shear intimidation" by members like "us" who are of greater value as elite as it gets. Just sit back and watch another "worthless member" respond to this!! lol!
What pisses me off...People who seemingly act charming and kind, but harrass people using aliases for no reason other than what I perceive to be some type of petty jealousy. Fucking ridiculous!
Edited at: Saturday, March 14, 2009 3:26:07 AM
[Return_of_Darth_Painkiller_0870] Friday, March 13, 2009 3:35:51 AM
What pisses me off...People who seemingly act charming and kind, but harrass people using aliases for no reason other than what I perceive to be some type of petty jealousy. Fucking ridiculous!
[Bev] Tuesday, March 10, 2009 2:44:32 PM
hm?? Not sure how to read this ... spouse might say one thing, son another, and friends well, let's just say the movie about how to alienate people was based on my life Draw your own conclusion
I'm a tad past 30, nearing 50 ... If you're anywhere near that number, you've earned "bitchy"! Embrace it! In the famed words of the immortals: "I'll stand my ground - I won't go down" Moral of this story being, be sure Ram It Down is in the car next time you have your hair done ; )
spapad wrote:
Your right, it is a lack of assertiveness on my behalf I suppose. Back in the late 80's, earlly nineties they would always want to take a curling iron to my hair and I would say no I would rather you not and they would be like, oh come on, just a little. Always resulted in a trip straight home to wash that mess out. Now they don't even ask and I wonder if they even pay attention to what it looks like when I come in. LOL I guess I will just have to learn to be "bitchy". LOL
TIMBONI wrote:
You're too nice. Just go in and tell them " just put it back like this when we're done "
spapad wrote:
Because they all do it no matter where I go! They do! So I have given up!
TIMBONI wrote:
This may sound incredibly simplistic, but why don't you go to a different salon ?
spapad wrote:
Why, why, why, why, why!.............Every time!!!!................I go to the salon to have my hair done and I walk in having it styled the way I like it styled, and when I walk out it's styled so dumb! I look like the cartoon of Prince Valiant! They always say, so.......how do you like it? and I take my hands and mess it up and say, I guess I'll fix it when I get home. I still tip well simply because it takes them two hours to lighten my hair, but my God, cant they just put my hair back to the way it was when I came in the door!! Men, I know you have not a clue what I'm bitching about! LOL
[Bazookajoe_666] Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:35:23 AM
.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:35:54 AM
[Bazookajoe_666] Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:35:21 AM
I've never clicked on the recent post haha. I just click on the threads that interest me. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Sunday, March 08, 2009 10:47:29 AM)
Head banger wrote:
sure, its so much easier than seeing what thread what happened in.
_strat_ wrote:
You still do that? I stoped when I was away for a while... Got some couple of 10.000 messages since my last visit. I just go through threads.
Head banger wrote:
that I log in here for the first time all weekend, hit up the 547 recent posts, then hit the wrong button, close the window, and have to troll thru all the threads to see what was going on. ARGH
I'm a tad past 30, nearing 50 ... If you're anywhere near that number, you've earned "bitchy"! Embrace it! In the famed words of the immortals: "I'll stand my ground - I won't go down" Moral of this story being, be sure Ram It Down is in the car next time you have your hair done ; )
spapad wrote:
Your right, it is a lack of assertiveness on my behalf I suppose. Back in the late 80's, earlly nineties they would always want to take a curling iron to my hair and I would say no I would rather you not and they would be like, oh come on, just a little. Always resulted in a trip straight home to wash that mess out. Now they don't even ask and I wonder if they even pay attention to what it looks like when I come in. LOL I guess I will just have to learn to be "bitchy". LOL
TIMBONI wrote:
You're too nice. Just go in and tell them " just put it back like this when we're done "
spapad wrote:
Because they all do it no matter where I go! They do! So I have given up!
TIMBONI wrote:
This may sound incredibly simplistic, but why don't you go to a different salon ?
spapad wrote:
Why, why, why, why, why!.............Every time!!!!................I go to the salon to have my hair done and I walk in having it styled the way I like it styled, and when I walk out it's styled so dumb! I look like the cartoon of Prince Valiant! They always say, so.......how do you like it? and I take my hands and mess it up and say, I guess I'll fix it when I get home. I still tip well simply because it takes them two hours to lighten my hair, but my God, cant they just put my hair back to the way it was when I came in the door!! Men, I know you have not a clue what I'm bitching about! LOL
[_strat_] Tuesday, March 10, 2009 6:26:43 AM
Lol... I know how you feel. I have a haircut once a year. I usualy leave it long over winter, and then cut it in spring, so Im not hot in the summer. By March, everyone is nagging me that I should go. And of course, the same people then laugh their asses off when I come back with really short hair... lol. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by DelivererofEvil from Tuesday, March 10, 2009 6:13:06 AM)
DelivererofEvil wrote:
Hair dressers are probably the same on both sides of the Atlantic, but the trick I figured out to use on my trips there (usually I'm dragged and kicked into a hair dresser's when all the women I know come together and literally drag me there ) is to look them in the eye with a serious, but polite face and simply say what I want. Precisely
"Stand your ground, don't go down"
Edited at: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 6:28:44 AM
[DelivererofEvil] Tuesday, March 10, 2009 6:13:06 AM
Hair dressers are probably the same on both sides of the Atlantic, but the trick I figured out to use on my trips there (usually I'm dragged and kicked into a hair dresser's when all the women I know come together and literally drag me there ) is to look them in the eye with a serious, but polite face and simply say what I want. Precisely
"Stand your ground, don't go down"
[Return_of_Darth_Painkiller_0870] Tuesday, March 10, 2009 5:22:26 AM
You just need to find a better salon, spapad. Then again, that would require you to uproot and go northeast. I can name 4 in my area who actually listen to what the client wants. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Monday, March 09, 2009 8:05:28 PM)
spapad wrote:
I probably do need that! I have just always accepted the fact that the stylists do what they want no matter what I say. Ram it down Cd or Painkiller! Something to make me grow a pseudo set, to deal with these ladies who sytle hair!
[Necroticist] Tuesday, March 10, 2009 12:36:46 AM
Ya..Insomnia..tried to sleep about 2 am..is now 5.30 am...useless..
[TIMBONI] Monday, March 09, 2009 11:47:48 PM
Absolutely. When you pay for something, it's not unreasonable to expect the results you want. Not the results they want. That's not bitchy, that's just right ! But you know what ? If that's what people want to call it, cool. Like when people tell me I'm an asshole. My response is " Yeah, and . . . ."
[spapad] Monday, March 09, 2009 8:05:28 PM
I probably do need that! I have just always accepted the fact that the stylists do what they want no matter what I say. Ram it down Cd or Painkiller! Something to make me grow a pseudo set, to deal with these ladies who sytle hair!
[Bev] Monday, March 09, 2009 7:22:20 PM
I'm a tad past 30, nearing 50 ... If you're anywhere near that number, you've earned "bitchy"! Embrace it! In the famed words of the immortals: "I'll stand my ground - I won't go down" Moral of this story being, be sure Ram It Down is in the car next time you have your hair done ; )
Your right, it is a lack of assertiveness on my behalf I suppose. Back in the late 80's, earlly nineties they would always want to take a curling iron to my hair and I would say no I would rather you not and they would be like, oh come on, just a little. Always resulted in a trip straight home to wash that mess out. Now they don't even ask and I wonder if they even pay attention to what it looks like when I come in. LOL I guess I will just have to learn to be "bitchy". LOL
TIMBONI wrote:
You're too nice. Just go in and tell them " just put it back like this when we're done "
spapad wrote:
Because they all do it no matter where I go! They do! So I have given up!
TIMBONI wrote:
This may sound incredibly simplistic, but why don't you go to a different salon ?
spapad wrote:
Why, why, why, why, why!.............Every time!!!!................I go to the salon to have my hair done and I walk in having it styled the way I like it styled, and when I walk out it's styled so dumb! I look like the cartoon of Prince Valiant! They always say, so.......how do you like it? and I take my hands and mess it up and say, I guess I'll fix it when I get home. I still tip well simply because it takes them two hours to lighten my hair, but my God, cant they just put my hair back to the way it was when I came in the door!! Men, I know you have not a clue what I'm bitching about! LOL
[spapad] Monday, March 09, 2009 5:43:22 PM
Your right, it is a lack of assertiveness on my behalf I suppose. Back in the late 80's, earlly nineties they would always want to take a curling iron to my hair and I would say no I would rather you not and they would be like, oh come on, just a little. Always resulted in a trip straight home to wash that mess out. Now they don't even ask and I wonder if they even pay attention to what it looks like when I come in. LOL I guess I will just have to learn to be "bitchy". LOL [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by TIMBONI from Sunday, March 08, 2009 4:32:17 PM)
TIMBONI wrote:
You're too nice. Just go in and tell them " just put it back like this when we're done "
spapad wrote:
Because they all do it no matter where I go! They do! So I have given up!
TIMBONI wrote:
This may sound incredibly simplistic, but why don't you go to a different salon ?
spapad wrote:
Why, why, why, why, why!.............Every time!!!!................I go to the salon to have my hair done and I walk in having it styled the way I like it styled, and when I walk out it's styled so dumb! I look like the cartoon of Prince Valiant! They always say, so.......how do you like it? and I take my hands and mess it up and say, I guess I'll fix it when I get home. I still tip well simply because it takes them two hours to lighten my hair, but my God, cant they just put my hair back to the way it was when I came in the door!! Men, I know you have not a clue what I'm bitching about! LOL
[Bev] Monday, March 09, 2009 4:48:07 AM
Narcisism (?) think we all have it in us as a defense, maybe. It' is troublesome when it comes in clusters (oximoronic huh?) Who'da thunk "narcisistic sheeple" ... my rant for the day! (sighs) K, now I'm gone for the day
[TIMBONI] Sunday, March 08, 2009 4:32:17 PM
You're too nice. Just go in and tell them " just put it back like this when we're done " [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Sunday, March 08, 2009 4:24:56 PM)
spapad wrote:
Because they all do it no matter where I go! They do! So I have given up!
TIMBONI wrote:
This may sound incredibly simplistic, but why don't you go to a different salon ?
spapad wrote:
Why, why, why, why, why!.............Every time!!!!................I go to the salon to have my hair done and I walk in having it styled the way I like it styled, and when I walk out it's styled so dumb! I look like the cartoon of Prince Valiant! They always say, so.......how do you like it? and I take my hands and mess it up and say, I guess I'll fix it when I get home. I still tip well simply because it takes them two hours to lighten my hair, but my God, cant they just put my hair back to the way it was when I came in the door!! Men, I know you have not a clue what I'm bitching about! LOL
[spapad] Sunday, March 08, 2009 4:24:56 PM
Because they all do it no matter where I go! They do! So I have given up! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by TIMBONI from Sunday, March 08, 2009 4:15:57 PM)
TIMBONI wrote:
This may sound incredibly simplistic, but why don't you go to a different salon ?
spapad wrote:
Why, why, why, why, why!.............Every time!!!!................I go to the salon to have my hair done and I walk in having it styled the way I like it styled, and when I walk out it's styled so dumb! I look like the cartoon of Prince Valiant! They always say, so.......how do you like it? and I take my hands and mess it up and say, I guess I'll fix it when I get home. I still tip well simply because it takes them two hours to lighten my hair, but my God, cant they just put my hair back to the way it was when I came in the door!! Men, I know you have not a clue what I'm bitching about! LOL
[TIMBONI] Sunday, March 08, 2009 4:15:57 PM
This may sound incredibly simplistic, but why don't you go to a different salon ? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Friday, March 06, 2009 7:11:46 PM)
spapad wrote:
Why, why, why, why, why!.............Every time!!!!................I go to the salon to have my hair done and I walk in having it styled the way I like it styled, and when I walk out it's styled so dumb! I look like the cartoon of Prince Valiant! They always say, so.......how do you like it? and I take my hands and mess it up and say, I guess I'll fix it when I get home. I still tip well simply because it takes them two hours to lighten my hair, but my God, cant they just put my hair back to the way it was when I came in the door!! Men, I know you have not a clue what I'm bitching about! LOL
[Head banger] Sunday, March 08, 2009 10:47:29 AM
sure, its so much easier than seeing what thread what happened in. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Sunday, March 08, 2009 10:35:29 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
You still do that? I stoped when I was away for a while... Got some couple of 10.000 messages since my last visit. I just go through threads.
Head banger wrote:
that I log in here for the first time all weekend, hit up the 547 recent posts, then hit the wrong button, close the window, and have to troll thru all the threads to see what was going on. ARGH
[_strat_] Sunday, March 08, 2009 10:35:29 AM
You still do that? I stoped when I was away for a while... Got some couple of 10.000 messages since my last visit. I just go through threads. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Sunday, March 08, 2009 10:21:35 AM)
Head banger wrote:
that I log in here for the first time all weekend, hit up the 547 recent posts, then hit the wrong button, close the window, and have to troll thru all the threads to see what was going on. ARGH
[Head banger] Sunday, March 08, 2009 10:21:35 AM
that I log in here for the first time all weekend, hit up the 547 recent posts, then hit the wrong button, close the window, and have to troll thru all the threads to see what was going on. ARGH
[spapad] Friday, March 06, 2009 7:11:46 PM
Why, why, why, why, why!.............Every time!!!!................I go to the salon to have my hair done and I walk in having it styled the way I like it styled, and when I walk out it's styled so dumb! I look like the cartoon of Prince Valiant! They always say, so.......how do you like it? and I take my hands and mess it up and say, I guess I'll fix it when I get home. I still tip well simply because it takes them two hours to lighten my hair, but my God, cant they just put my hair back to the way it was when I came in the door!! Men, I know you have not a clue what I'm bitching about! LOL
[J.D. DIAMOND] Thursday, March 05, 2009 5:13:53 PM
Forget it, then. Im sure that there are plenty of other tit experts, who will be happy to do it.
Head banger wrote:
you will webcast this too me? my fee including travel may bankrupt you. as an expert, my opinion is quite expensive. capitalism you know.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 12:41:04 PM
Forget it, then. Im sure that there are plenty of other tit experts, who will be happy to do it. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:21:58 AM)
Head banger wrote:
you will webcast this too me? my fee including travel may bankrupt you. as an expert, my opinion is quite expensive. capitalism you know.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[Deep Freeze] Thursday, March 05, 2009 11:45:39 AM
My friend, you are employing a double infinitive. You would say , "Where's Freeze?" or "Where is Freeze?" but you do not need to put "at" on the end of your sentence..... BWWWAAAAAAAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now, go get yourself a SAMMICH!!! HAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Darth_Painkiller_0870 from Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:45:31 AM)
Darth_Painkiller_0870 wrote:
Justin misspelling sandwich and calling it 'sammich'. What in God's name is a sammich? Where's Freeze at!!??
[Return_of_Darth_Painkiller_0870] Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:45:31 AM
Justin misspelling sandwich and calling it 'sammich'. What in God's name is a sammich? Where's Freeze at!!??
[Head banger] Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:23:22 AM
currently pissing me off.
wind
work
[Head banger] Thursday, March 05, 2009 10:21:58 AM
you will webcast this too me? my fee including travel may bankrupt you. as an expert, my opinion is quite expensive. capitalism you know. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:25:46 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[Head banger] Thursday, March 05, 2009 7:25:32 AM
apparently thats comon in asia. also butock implants???? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by spapad from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:15:18 PM)
spapad wrote:
Oh yuck, Ladies could you imagine going out with a guy and finding out he had Pec implants! ........NO!!! Gross!
[Return_of_Darth_Painkiller_0870] Thursday, March 05, 2009 5:30:18 AM
And where is Deep Duck? He's usually on by now.
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:23:22 AM
A bewitched log? You think if a princess gives him a kiss that he will then turn into a duck/swan?
We should perform the experiment with and without the pool cover, and compare the results.
HAAAAA!!!! A SWAN!!?? I would guess a log to be more accurate were he to actually float. A bewitched log at that.
My money is still on him dropping like a stone off my diving board. Granted, I have no children so should not expect to have my children's children affected much but, hey, I just want to kick the guy into my pool for a laugh (er, um...I mean "experiment")! I may or may not take off the pool cover.
_strat_ wrote:
Now, now, no more about bets. This is a serious scientific experiment.
The duck possibility has to be considered. Also, he could be a swan, or just a log. In any case, we have to take into consideration his overall body density, and compare it to that of water, because that determines wheter or not he will float. But, enough theory, we need to try it out for real. He wont like it, Im sure, but hey... Sacrifices are neccesary when it comes to such scientific breakthroughs as this one. The future of our children, and our childrens children may well depend on wheter Freeze will float or sink.
guidogodoy wrote:
You're on!
Of course you realize that if he were to float it also could mean he was a duck.....LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation.
guidogodoy wrote:
It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:18:48 AM
HAAAAA!!!! A SWAN!!?? I would guess a log to be more accurate were he to actually float. A bewitched log at that.
My money is still on him dropping like a stone off my diving board. Granted, I have no children so should not expect to have my children's children affected much but, hey, I just want to kick the guy into my pool for a laugh (er, um...I mean "experiment")! I may or may not take off the pool cover. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:06:59 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Now, now, no more about bets. This is a serious scientific experiment.
The duck possibility has to be considered. Also, he could be a swan, or just a log. In any case, we have to take into consideration his overall body density, and compare it to that of water, because that determines wheter or not he will float. But, enough theory, we need to try it out for real. He wont like it, Im sure, but hey... Sacrifices are neccesary when it comes to such scientific breakthroughs as this one. The future of our children, and our childrens children may well depend on wheter Freeze will float or sink.
guidogodoy wrote:
You're on!
Of course you realize that if he were to float it also could mean he was a duck.....LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation.
guidogodoy wrote:
It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 4:06:59 AM
Now, now, no more about bets. This is a serious scientific experiment.
The duck possibility has to be considered. Also, he could be a swan, or just a log. In any case, we have to take into consideration his overall body density, and compare it to that of water, because that determines wheter or not he will float. But, enough theory, we need to try it out for real. He wont like it, Im sure, but hey... Sacrifices are neccesary when it comes to such scientific breakthroughs as this one. The future of our children, and our childrens children may well depend on wheter Freeze will float or sink. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:57:33 AM)
guidogodoy wrote:
You're on!
Of course you realize that if he were to float it also could mean he was a duck.....LOL!!!
_strat_ wrote:
I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation.
guidogodoy wrote:
It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:57:33 AM
You're on!
Of course you realize that if he were to float it also could mean he was a duck.....LOL!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:48:29 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation.
guidogodoy wrote:
It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:48:29 AM
I see. Innocent = sink. Not innocent = float. I have 20€ that say he will float.
And I cant wait till he gets on here and sees this conversation. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:45:26 AM)
guidogodoy wrote:
It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:45:26 AM
It would be like testing to see if he is a witch! He doesn't float then he goes to the Hereafter with the peace of mind knowing he was innocent!
...and that he should have considered fake boobs. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:46:06 AM
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:40:05 AM
I think that the phrase youre looking for is "big guhrlie man!!!" spoken in a thick Austrian accent...
In any case... What if he doesnt float? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:26:36 AM)
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Let's kick HIM in my pool to see if he floats! HAAAAAAA!!!! (oh wait, this probably deviates a bit from the original experiment...) [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:05:51 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs.
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 3:05:51 AM
Aha. So youre saying that women have more fat than men? Cool with me... But some members will probably want to scratch your eyes out.
Oh, and I could always get really fat, and get man-boobs. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:42:39 AM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results.
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:42:39 AM
Do you have man-boobs?
I think your idea would give skewed results anyway. Wouldn't work with men who tend to have a lower overall body-fat index. Muscle simply weighs more than fat.
Don't know about you but my head alone would ruin the results. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:25:46 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better.
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:25:46 AM
Ok. You get them implants, and we`ll go swimming. HB will be the independant expert, who will determine who floats better. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:12:51 AM)
guidogodoy wrote:
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Now then....volunteers? (Quoting Message by _strat_ from Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM)
_strat_ wrote:
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[guidogodoy] Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:12:51 AM
I think we should conduct our own "independent" study.
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"...
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Edited at: Thursday, March 05, 2009 2:16:19 AM
[_strat_] Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37:17 AM
Really? I saw another show (Brainiac, I think) where they did an experiment and got the opposite result. Not very scientific, tho. They just got two girls, one fake and one natural into a pool, and "observed"... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:51 PM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
LOL ... In that case, I think the football players woulda had half a chance if they had Bev along!
I'm off 'til later as well. Thanks for the laughs, gang! Cheers
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:16:00 PM
LOL ... In that case, I think the football players woulda had half a chance if they had Bev along!
I'm off 'til later as well. Thanks for the laughs, gang! Cheers [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:51 PM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
[spapad] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:15:18 PM
Oh yuck, Ladies could you imagine going out with a guy and finding out he had Pec implants! ........NO!!! Gross!
[spapad] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:51 PM
Yeah right! I guess all she wanted for Christmas was a sexy bra for Gramps! LOL [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:02 PM)
Bev wrote:
That's me, spa!!!
spapad wrote:
Hey!............What's going on!? ..............Who posted My Mother!!!
[Deep Freeze] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:13:51 PM
According to the show MANswers, fakes sink. Real ones float! (Fat content) HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK, gotta run. Dinner time!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:07:56 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
Ok, then. Plusses and minuses / fake vs. real. Plus for fake, they can always be used as a flotation device in case of a water landing. Minus for real, you might trip over them and break your neck falling down the stairs.
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:07:15 PM
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:02:06 PM
NO!!!! Personally, I am disgusted by them. If I wanted a barbie doll, I'd buy one.
Plus, a grandma with DDs is just plain and wrong.
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:00:13 PM
LOL
... you guys stop makin' me cry; I'm half way to grandma ((sniff, sniff)) [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:57:39 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
NO!!!! Personally, I am disgusted by them. If I wanted a barbie doll, I'd buy one.
Plus, a grandma with DDs is just plain and wrong.
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
... mmm ... Man Whores!!! Equal Employment Opportunity, all shapes and sizes, physically / mentally challenged - no problem, no glass ceiling in this industry. All applicants welcome ... MEOW
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:57:39 PM
NO!!!! Personally, I am disgusted by them. If I wanted a barbie doll, I'd buy one.
Plus, a grandma with DDs is just plain and wrong. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:49:06 PM)
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:56:53 PM
... mmm ... Man Whores!!! Equal Employment Opportunity, all shapes and sizes, physically / mentally challenged - no problem, no glass ceiling in this industry. All applicants welcome ... MEOW
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Deep Freeze] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:55:51 PM
BWWWWAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by MG_Metalgoddess from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:51:29 PM)
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:55:33 PM
... mmm ... Man Whores!!! Equal Employment Opportunity, all shapes and sizes, physically / mentally challenged - no problem, no glass ceiling in this industry. All applicants welcome ... MEOW
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:55:08 PM
its just a word, could have used prostitution, but spelling and typing....
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:54:45 PM
... mmm ... Man Whores!!! Equal Employment Opportunity, all shapes and sizes, physically / mentally challenged - no problem, no glass ceiling in this industry. All applicants welcome ... MEOW [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by MG_Metalgoddess from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:51:29 PM)
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
Bev wrote:
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:51:29 PM
Yeah I hear you.... Everyday I see these buisness opening???????? topless coffee shop ect..
Cleaning lady would be me too... LOL
Oh before I forget... that goes for you men too.... LMAO
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!!
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:49:06 PM
God I hope not! I can't believe all guys out for a lay are into fake boobs. If they are that's just ridiculous ... I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by MG_Metalgoddess from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:43:36 PM)
MG_Metalgoddess wrote:
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job.....
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[~ MG_Metalgoddess~] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:43:36 PM
LMAO... Yeah pretty soon everyone will need a boob lift.. just to get a job..... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:41:49 PM)
Bev wrote:
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ...
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:41:49 PM
You said "whore" ... you know how that upsets me All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:16:29 PM)
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Deep Freeze] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 5:26:47 PM
HAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:39:42 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Freeze, George Carlin just called from up there (yes, there is "up there" and hes feeling like a total jerk). He wants his royalties, or else Joe Pesci will come round your place with a baseball bat.
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:40:58 PM
no, since its not popular, the cause can continue for years. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:19:55 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
You really did it? A pro government stance? First Freeze, now you... Next thing will be me saying that capitalism isnt so bad after all...
And sex isnt something I would rally against, if thats what you mean.
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:19:55 PM
You really did it? A pro government stance? First Freeze, now you... Next thing will be me saying that capitalism isnt so bad after all...
And sex isnt something I would rally against, if thats what you mean. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:16:29 PM)
Head banger wrote:
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:16:29 PM
LOL and a govt dept in charge of sex might be worse than the hells angels. I just proposed a pro govt stance. what is the world coming too? sure, there would always be a few that get around the issue, but the majority would be in the red light district, or a govt whore house. I would name it the Govt whorehouse of (whatevertown). said whorehouse or red light district would be beter for the girls than working dark streets in some warehouse district.
Strat, I see. think it might be that it is harder to cure. we always need a cause to rally against [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Bev from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:11:05 PM)
Bev wrote:
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:11:39 PM
No, Im suggesting that the solution to the AIDS problem is less pleasant than solutions to other problems.
As for prostitution, I agree. I think that the Dutch have it the right way. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:05:03 PM)
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:11:05 PM
Sounds reasonable. There would still be some, in it for the thrill of the chase, that would prolly find a way around the system; and, there is that distasteful element requiring the creation of yet another governmental entity (no pun intended-lol). Never a perfect world, but a step in the right direction. imo [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:05:03 PM)
Head banger wrote:
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt.
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 4:05:03 PM
your sugesting aids is a more popular cure than the others?
Bev, your right. not to mention all the efforts to reduce prostitution, to move it to a more paletable area, to control it. what about this. legalize it, licence it, test for aids (and other things) and make them pay taxes. if you eliminate the criminal aspect, you eliminate most of the problems, and create a revenue stream for the govt. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by _strat_ from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:37:57 PM)
_strat_ wrote:
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex?
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:39:42 PM
Freeze, George Carlin just called from up there (yes, there is "up there" and hes feeling like a total jerk). He wants his royalties, or else Joe Pesci will come round your place with a baseball bat. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:32:34 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[_strat_] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:37:57 PM
Maybe its because of the solutions? I mean, the solution to famine is more food. The solution to war is somehow achieving peace. Thats fine. Solution to AIDS... No sex? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:31:49 PM)
Head banger wrote:
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids....
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bev] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:37:54 PM
Can you imagine how many meals all the money johns spend on hookers could buy? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by METAL MELTDOWN from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:31:51 PM)
METAL MELTDOWN wrote:
My heart is not bleeding for the children abroad but for the children on our neck of the forest but I think it could be that a child cannot fend for itself where as the 20 something hooker can...
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[METAL MELTDOWN] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 3:31:51 PM
My heart is not bleeding for the children abroad but for the children on our neck of the forest but I think it could be that a child cannot fend for itself where as the 20 something hooker can... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:32:34 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:31:49 PM
its all about what is popular, it has nothing to do with actualy saving anyone, just popularity. kids raise money. it causes fear.
look at the fund raising to treat aids in africa. huge. you would think it was the number one killer there. nope. rising at a rate it will be. nope. Malaria kills more people in africa than Aids. Famine and war are also ahead. but, which gets more funding?
we need a feel good cause, and a fear cause. children are the feel good, there are a host of fear causes. global warming, cancer, aids.... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:32:34 AM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Bazookajoe_666] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:41:16 AM
It's pissing me off that school is boring as shit BUT I made a deal with myself not to skip anymore for a while and go to class.
[Deep Freeze] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:32:34 AM
My apologies upfront to the liberal, tree-hugging bleeding hearts among us (you know who you are) but this is what is (again) PISSING me Off!!!;
I just saw yet another commercial on television for one of those "feed the poor children of Africa" organizations. You know the ones..some grim faced, nearly weeping woman or a guy with glasses and a scraggly, grey beard is in front of the camera going on about how these poor, helpless kids are suffering and don't know where their next meal is coming from and need YOUR help now. WHATEVER!!!!!!!!!!
To begin with, why is it that children are so friggin special?? What is it with people that makes them consider children a more important form of human life than adults???? Why should I consider a child's life more valuable or more significant than, say, a twenty-six year old girl in Bolivia that has to prostitute herself to feed her seven illegitimate kids and four grandparents??? Where is the organization for them?? And what about the drug lord that has been devastated by the "War on Drugs" and had his cartel nearly dismantled and cannot pay for his wife's lipo and his hooker's apartment?? Why are they left out of all this??? WHERE IS THE EQUITY????
Every country has poverty. Worse yet, there are literally millions and millions of suffering children AND adults all over the world that have it rough. Who is the guy (or gal) that decides what form of suffering is more signifcant than the other??????????
[Head banger] Wednesday, March 04, 2009 7:16:31 AM
hais or nipples. after 6miles, nipples would be the least of my wories. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:20:03 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair.
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
[Vaillant 3.0] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:46:20 PM
Do you WAANT to come back to my place, bouncy bouncy! I am no longer infected. (Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:27:31 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Pfffff...after running that much, my nipples would be the least of my problems. They would probably come after the heart-attack I'll definitely suffer (along with my already-shin-splinted left leg).
guidogodoy wrote:
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair.
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:42:32 PM
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:39:10 PM
My nipples explode with delight!
Do you WAANT to come back to my place, bouncy bouncy! I am no longer infected. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Vaillant 3.0 from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:27:31 PM)
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Pfffff...after running that much, my nipples would be the least of my problems. They would probably come after the heart-attack I'll definitely suffer (along with my already-shin-splinted left leg).
guidogodoy wrote:
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair.
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
Edited at: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:42:32 PM
[Vaillant 3.0] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:27:31 PM
Pfffff...after running that much, my nipples would be the least of my problems. They would probably come after the heart-attack I'll definitely suffer (along with my already-shin-splinted left leg). [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:20:03 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Vaillant 3.0 wrote:
Nipples, too? First its your John Tiny-er...John Thomas and now this?
Here's my advice: grow some chest hair.
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:25:03 PM
You know, I didn't like that movie. I own it and LOVED "Shawn of the Dead" but that was just too goofy.
Had promise but devolved into a chick-flick, nonsense "hit too close to home" film. Anyone who runs marathons would understand just how bad that movie was. Like either could get to the "elite" group. She WAS a hottie, though.... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by devils_child from Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:38:44 PM)
devils_child wrote:
Vaseline?.... Isn't that what the guy used in Run Fatboy Run?..... Or you can run shirtless... that would be easier.... and ....sexier.....
guidogodoy wrote:
My nipples! I throw down the gauntlet to any guy to run six miles and not come back with "damage." Like body surfing all day in the ocean.
Trick for marathons? Liquid bandages! Trust me, runners. It'll save your life.
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:20:03 PM
HEY! I have three (really long ones one each side).
Tell you what. YOU go run 6 miles and give me a nipple post-mortem! HAAAAAA!!!!!
Just sit back and watch another "worthless member" respond to this!! lol!
Draw your own conclusion
) is to look them in the eye with a serious, but polite face and simply say what I want. Precisely
I know they like to look at 'em, but, when it comes to the nitty-gritty ... some like perky, some like it natural (thank whatever spirit moves 'em). If that were the case, I'd definitely be the cleaning woman!!! 
All kidding aside. Think the same guy that thought of the topless flight attendants, saving the airline industry, would work well as head of the dept ... 
... stop teasing (ah, take me back a few years) 
BAHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... could you see Freeze or guido in a bra serving coffee,,
