[Craig Wagenhoffer] Saturday, April 03, 2010 3:51:48 PM
Motörhead's version of Cat Scratch Fever is one of the greatest covers I've ever heard! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Craig Wagenhoffer from Saturday, April 03, 2010 3:50:21 PM)
Craig Wagenhoffer wrote:
[Craig Wagenhoffer] Saturday, April 03, 2010 3:50:21 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Saturday, April 03, 2010 2:48:59 PM
Motorhead - In The Black from the Inferno LP...this song sticks in my head for days after I hear it once! Just excellent.
Edited at: Saturday, April 03, 2010 2:50:23 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Friday, April 02, 2010 3:16:49 PM
Oh hell yeah! Everybody has thier own take on what is a band's best album,and to me 2004 "Inferno" is the best Motorhead album they have ever done.Every track is a hit single and each one is absolutely excellent,"Life's A Bitch" is fuckin kick ass Painkiller!!! They played "In The Name Of Tradgedy" when I saw them in October here in Seattle and it was amazing!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Painkiller87 from Friday, April 02, 2010 3:10:54 PM)
Painkiller87 wrote:
Inferno is probably the best of their new material. I can't get enough of this song either!
[Painkiller87] Friday, April 02, 2010 3:10:54 PM
Inferno is probably the best of their new material. I can't get enough of this song either!
[J.D. DIAMOND] Friday, April 02, 2010 2:10:33 PM
MOTORHEAD - HEART OF STONE -1982 Iron Fist LP
Hey Painkiller87,the whole album of Iron Fist is totally excellent,used to have this on vinyl back in the 80's but who knows what happened to it? lol! Motorhead keep proving year after year that they are one of the most consistant bands that knows how to write killer albums year after year and they just keep rolling out classics,its truely amazing to tell ya the truth,can't wait for the new album!!!!
I love this tune a lot. I was so psyched seeing them with Priest back in '08!!
Edited at: Friday, April 02, 2010 2:25:39 PM Edited at: Friday, April 02, 2010 2:26:29 PM
[Brian_Evans] Friday, April 02, 2010 11:50:25 AM
Yeah thats right , you were saying that before I joinde the forum. I'll give you credit for that. But you were also saying that Motorhead wasn't a Heavy Metal band but some kind of hard greasy biker style band instead. Now you're on here saying they are one of champions of British Heavy Metal. So which on is it? Are they heavy metal or not? Make up your mind or do you change it every day. The contradiction continues. BaHa!!!!!! Busted again!!
J.D. Diamond wrote:
"Even though Motorhead is not "heavy metal" and Iron Maiden is heavy metal.....the question would be in which era?"
"Judas Priest,Motorhead and Saxon are the champions of British Heavy Metal."
rofl!!!
UP THE IRONS!!!!!!! Edited at: Friday, April 02, 2010 11:58:13 AM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Thursday, April 01, 2010 1:39:32 PM
Oh i know it Becks!! And the funny thing is that we were saying this all along way before that retarded piece of shit Maiden fanboy joined this forum,Freeze is right nobody should even talk to him,I've stomped him and defeated him 10 times over as everybody already knows so theres no point in posting in his lame stupid thread lol! This guy is retarded to the max and he has proven it to the rest of the forum. Everybody just stop responding to him,let him talk to himself and post by himself for now on...he will get bored if nobody awknowleges him....fuckin loser lol!
Motorhead blows aways Iron Maiden so far into the dirt its unexplainable,Maiden is a "trend" that people listen to because its the "hip thing to do" they listen to them because everybody else likes them so they feel they have to like them too to try and "fit in" with the masses of sheep just like Metallica fans,there is no difference between the "TREND" of Iron Maiden and Shitallica,no difference,dumb people listen to post Cliff Burton era Metallica because its the trendy thing to do,they see all these trendy kiddies listening to shitallica so they feel they have to be a part in that,thats why they are "sheep". Fuck off to Iron Maiden and fuck off to all Iron Maiden fans.
[hellrider 31038] Wednesday, March 31, 2010 9:53:49 PM
MOTORHEAD EASILY ALL THE WAY
[guidogodoy] Wednesday, March 31, 2010 5:06:39 PM
A-FREAKIN'-MEN!!! THAT is what I have been saying for ages now! Exactly why I can't stand current Maiden. A Matter of Life and Death led me to that very conclusion. Every (seemingly 17 minute) song changes tempo so often I just can't get into it. Never have, never will and believe me, I have tried.
One guitarist too many, too many poor, droning songs to count. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:57:34 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
One thing I've noticed about their later material, from Brave New World onwards, is this tendency to try and be to clever. When you listen to their old stuff, from Iron Maiden through to Fear Of The Dark, the songs are constructed in two ways. They either start at a certain tempo and pretty much stick with it or they build and build and build and then reach a peak and finish. This works well as you'd have your three to five minute songs that just go along and then you'd have your longer "epic" kind of songs which are usually six or seven minutes. The obvious exception is Ancient Mariner at 13 minutes. Nowadays it seems to me that Maiden do to many songs maybe start out slow, build up to a peak, then change tempo again chugging along then try to build up again before winding down. It's things like that that get boring. It worked for Mariner but that was a one off. They end up with a good idea for a four minute song turning into a boring eight minute song. Whether it's Harris or not I don't know but it pisses me off. I hate putting a new cd in and seeing that it's 76 minutes long or something.
[Becks] Wednesday, March 31, 2010 4:23:20 PM
I agree with the trying to be clever comment JJ. I think Maiden needs to realise that fans don't necessarily want some egotistical insanely long album. It's very rare that it actually works, like you say. Marriner is the exception. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:57:34 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
One thing I've noticed about their later material, from Brave New World onwards, is this tendency to try and be to clever. When you listen to their old stuff, from Iron Maiden through to Fear Of The Dark, the songs are constructed in two ways. They either start at a certain tempo and pretty much stick with it or they build and build and build and then reach a peak and finish. This works well as you'd have your three to five minute songs that just go along and then you'd have your longer "epic" kind of songs which are usually six or seven minutes. The obvious exception is Ancient Mariner at 13 minutes. Nowadays it seems to me that Maiden do to many songs maybe start out slow, build up to a peak, then change tempo again chugging along then try to build up again before winding down. It's things like that that get boring. It worked for Mariner but that was a one off. They end up with a good idea for a four minute song turning into a boring eight minute song. Whether it's Harris or not I don't know but it pisses me off. I hate putting a new cd in and seeing that it's 76 minutes long or something.
[jimmyjames] Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:57:34 PM
One thing I've noticed about their later material, from Brave New World onwards, is this tendency to try and be to clever. When you listen to their old stuff, from Iron Maiden through to Fear Of The Dark, the songs are constructed in two ways. They either start at a certain tempo and pretty much stick with it or they build and build and build and then reach a peak and finish. This works well as you'd have your three to five minute songs that just go along and then you'd have your longer "epic" kind of songs which are usually six or seven minutes. The obvious exception is Ancient Mariner at 13 minutes. Nowadays it seems to me that Maiden do to many songs maybe start out slow, build up to a peak, then change tempo again chugging along then try to build up again before winding down. It's things like that that get boring. It worked for Mariner but that was a one off. They end up with a good idea for a four minute song turning into a boring eight minute song. Whether it's Harris or not I don't know but it pisses me off. I hate putting a new cd in and seeing that it's 76 minutes long or something.
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:18:34 PM
I agree with you. I've never liked the band "Rush" but they used to play "rock" with a tad bit of progressiveness but it was rock and there were "riffs" ect..but when they hit around 1984-85- till now they are so progressive its really not Rush anymore with the songs they write. Iron Maiden to me is the "Rush" of heavy metal except they didn't go as far as Rush did with the over-the-top progressiveness but they still went far enough to agrivate old time Maiden fans especially fans of the band's first 7 studio albums(1980 -1988).
I actually like the AMOLAD album except for those 2 stupid tracks I've already mentioned several times because its the best thing I can get from Maiden since 1988's Seventh Son album but it still is light years from Seventh Son in quality,as I've said it is a great album for Iron Maiden as we all know they can get worse so I'm just trying to give the band some kind of credit.
I think the problem with Iron Maiden is "Steve Harris" and the reason I say that is because of Bruce Dickinson's last 3 studio albums Accident Of Birth,The Chemical Wedding and Tyranny Of Souls wich they are kinda progressive too but they are tons heavier and better quality of song writting,those 3 albums to me crush every Maiden album after 1988's Seventh Son album. I think Steve Harris says whats what and whos who...he is the master mind behind Iron Maiden and he says what goes and what doesn't,these less than average albums they keep putting out I blame on Steve Harris.
Judas Priest may not set the world on fire writting albums but really they lost Rob Halford a lot longer than Maiden lost Bruce and to be totally honest...Angel Of Retribution besides Lochness screams of classic Judas Priest and has that old-school sound....it could of easily been released in 1986 instead of Turbo...it could of been right there alongside Screaming For Vengeance and Defenders Of The Faith.
I'm not saying that its better than those albums but it could of easily been in that era with sound and quality song writting. Iron Maiden hasn't come close to Retribution with Brave New World,Dance Of Death or A Matter Of life And Death and I'm betting that The Final Frontier will be no exception.At least Priest gave us Angel Of Retribution and I'll put my money on that this next LP from our Metal Gods will be another classic in the Judas Priest shrine...we'll have to wait and see. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:16:55 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
The thing about Maiden is that they set the benchmark so high. Those first seven albums, up to an including Seventh Son are some of the greatest albums in the whole metal genre. Every single one of those albums is considered a classic. I think Maiden are fully aware that everything just clicked right back then and it's something they are never going to be able to recapture. They are also fully aware that the reason people come along to their shows is to see songs from those albums performed live. This is why they continue to play them and also the reason behind the Somewhere Back In Time Tour, which was a true world tour. I think Maiden truly enjoy touring and playing to their fans and thats why they continue to do so, it's not as if they need the money or anything. The reason they continue to release new albums is because it gives them a legitimate reason to get out there and play without falling into the whole nostalgia cash in type of thing a lot of bands are doing these days. (Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:22:39 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hell yeah jimmy the key thing for me about Motorhead is thier "consistancy" at writting good albums and not just good for Motorhead should do,good for mass people who like rock/heavy metal. They are #1 at consistant quality song writting album after album and they don't wait 3 or more years to write those albums I agree with you on that. I'm not linking you to my opinion about Iron Maiden,but to me Iron Maiden is they worst band at consistant song writting/albums of quality material. Compared to Motorhead it would be a mear joke to say that Maiden is just as consistant in writting quality songs and putting out quality albums of kick ass material and again this is not to toy with Brian and his likings for Iron Maiden,this is how I thougtht long before he unfortuantely joined our forum,Iron Maiden is just not good at writting quality songs on a consistant basis so again I'll have to say......
DOWN THE IRONS.
jimmyjames wrote:
The great thing about Motorhead is that they do put out albums on a regular basis. I remember when I was in Canada a year and a half ago and I saw the Motorizer cd at the mall. I was thinking but Kiss Of Death only came out 5 minutes ago. Now, a year and a half later another album is ready. All bands should be like this. Bands blame things like long tours etc being the reason for these extended periods in between albums but thats bullshit, Motorhead are always touring, they've even found the time to make it down here to NZ twice in the last 5 years. Motorhead is an example to all bands as far as having a work ethic goes. So many bands think 20 shows in the US and Canada and 15 in Europe constitutes a world tour and then they take a year off before starting work on the next album, not Motorhead. These guys are legends. Can't wait for the new album.
Check this out. This is awesome.
Edited at: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:18:45 PM
[jimmyjames] Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:16:55 PM
The thing about Maiden is that they set the benchmark so high. Those first seven albums, up to an including Seventh Son are some of the greatest albums in the whole metal genre. Every single one of those albums is considered a classic. I think Maiden are fully aware that everything just clicked right back then and it's something they are never going to be able to recapture. They are also fully aware that the reason people come along to their shows is to see songs from those albums performed live. This is why they continue to play them and also the reason behind the Somewhere Back In Time Tour, which was a true world tour. I think Maiden truly enjoy touring and playing to their fans and thats why they continue to do so, it's not as if they need the money or anything. The reason they continue to release new albums is because it gives them a legitimate reason to get out there and play without falling into the whole nostalgia cash in type of thing a lot of bands are doing these days. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:22:39 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hell yeah jimmy the key thing for me about Motorhead is thier "consistancy" at writting good albums and not just good for Motorhead should do,good for mass people who like rock/heavy metal. They are #1 at consistant quality song writting album after album and they don't wait 3 or more years to write those albums I agree with you on that. I'm not linking you to my opinion about Iron Maiden,but to me Iron Maiden is they worst band at consistant song writting/albums of quality material. Compared to Motorhead it would be a mear joke to say that Maiden is just as consistant in writting quality songs and putting out quality albums of kick ass material and again this is not to toy with Brian and his likings for Iron Maiden,this is how I thougtht long before he unfortuantely joined our forum,Iron Maiden is just not good at writting quality songs on a consistant basis so again I'll have to say......
DOWN THE IRONS.
jimmyjames wrote:
The great thing about Motorhead is that they do put out albums on a regular basis. I remember when I was in Canada a year and a half ago and I saw the Motorizer cd at the mall. I was thinking but Kiss Of Death only came out 5 minutes ago. Now, a year and a half later another album is ready. All bands should be like this. Bands blame things like long tours etc being the reason for these extended periods in between albums but thats bullshit, Motorhead are always touring, they've even found the time to make it down here to NZ twice in the last 5 years. Motorhead is an example to all bands as far as having a work ethic goes. So many bands think 20 shows in the US and Canada and 15 in Europe constitutes a world tour and then they take a year off before starting work on the next album, not Motorhead. These guys are legends. Can't wait for the new album.
Check this out. This is awesome.
Edited at: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:18:45 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:52:42 PM
We are Motorhead,born to kick your ass!!!
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
Edited at: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:54:51 PM
[Brian_Evans] Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:13:37 PM
Up The Irons!!!!!
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:23:57 PM
¡Cuidado con Tóxcatl! He oído que algo se va a pasar allá. Aquel idiota será mi primer sacrificio.
Sorry Guido, I still live here at Tenochtitlán. (and I´m pretty drunk by now). Sometimes I screw up my english.
guidogodoy wrote:
"GETTING boring?" FFS. Long dead.
I am off to listen to Stryper. Now THERE is some metal!
Al-fons Blazing wrote:
I like the four of them a lot, and I respect you for posting your own opinions on this four GREAT bands.
Judas Priest.
Iron Maiden.
Motorhead.
Saxon.
All of them kick ass, and they all have good and weak albums. This discussion is getting boring for me.
So, I'll watch Slayer's "Still Reigning" DVD.
See you. Edited at: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:45:11 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:22:39 PM
Hell yeah jimmy the key thing for me about Motorhead is thier "consistancy" at writting good albums and not just good for Motorhead should do,good for mass people who like rock/heavy metal. They are #1 at consistant quality song writting album after album and they don't wait 3 or more years to write those albums I agree with you on that. I'm not linking you to my opinion about Iron Maiden,but to me Iron Maiden is they worst band at consistant song writting/albums of quality material. Compared to Motorhead it would be a mear joke to say that Maiden is just as consistant in writting quality songs and putting out quality albums of kick ass material and again this is not to toy with Brian and his likings for Iron Maiden,this is how I thougtht long before he unfortuantely joined our forum,Iron Maiden is just not good at writting quality songs on a consistant basis so again I'll have to say......
The great thing about Motorhead is that they do put out albums on a regular basis. I remember when I was in Canada a year and a half ago and I saw the Motorizer cd at the mall. I was thinking but Kiss Of Death only came out 5 minutes ago. Now, a year and a half later another album is ready. All bands should be like this. Bands blame things like long tours etc being the reason for these extended periods in between albums but thats bullshit, Motorhead are always touring, they've even found the time to make it down here to NZ twice in the last 5 years. Motorhead is an example to all bands as far as having a work ethic goes. So many bands think 20 shows in the US and Canada and 15 in Europe constitutes a world tour and then they take a year off before starting work on the next album, not Motorhead. These guys are legends. Can't wait for the new album.
Check this out. This is awesome.
[Al-fons Blazing] Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:15:37 PM
Sorry Guido, I still live here at Tenochtitlán. (and I´m pretty drunk by now). Sometimes I screw up my english.
I am off to listen to Stryper. Now THERE is some metal!
Al-fons Blazing wrote:
I like the four of them a lot, and I respect you for posting your own opinions on this four GREAT bands.
Judas Priest.
Iron Maiden.
Motorhead.
Saxon.
All of them kick ass, and they all have good and weak albums. This discussion is getting boring for me.
So, I'll watch Slayer's "Still Reigning" DVD.
See you. Edited at: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:45:11 PM
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:47:54 PM
"GETTING boring?" FFS. Long dead.
I am off to listen to Stryper. Now THERE is some metal! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Al-fons Blazing from Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:43:20 PM)
Al-fons Blazing wrote:
I like the four of them a lot, and I respect you for posting your own opinions on this four GREAT bands.
Judas Priest.
Iron Maiden.
Motorhead.
Saxon.
All of them kick ass, and they all have good and weak albums. This discussion is getting boring for me.
So, I'll watch Slayer's "Still Reigning" DVD.
See you. Edited at: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:45:11 PM
[Al-fons Blazing] Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:43:20 PM
I like the four of them a lot, and I respect you for posting your own opinions on this four GREAT bands.
Judas Priest.
Iron Maiden.
Motorhead.
Saxon.
All of them kick ass, and they all have good and weak albums. This discussion is getting boring for me.
So, I'll watch Slayer's "Still Reigning" DVD.
See you. Edited at: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:45:11 PM
[guidogodoy] Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:16:29 PM
You strike me as one bored, sad individual.
Let's take a vote as to how many people want to talk to you? LOL!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:11:44 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
Just made a quick count of the post (opinions) in this thread and it looks like a slam dunk for Maiden so far. lol! I even gave Motorhead votes for being considered louder than Maiden. lol!
Iron Maiden 53
Motorhead 33
UP THE IRONS!!!!!
[Brian_Evans] Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:11:44 PM
Just made a quick count of the post (opinions) in this thread and it looks like a slam dunk for Maiden so far. lol! I even gave Motorhead votes for being considered louder than Maiden. lol!
Iron Maiden 53
Motorhead 33
UP THE IRONS!!!!! Edited at: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:29:26 PM
[jimmyjames] Tuesday, March 30, 2010 6:34:52 PM
The great thing about Motorhead is that they do put out albums on a regular basis. I remember when I was in Canada a year and a half ago and I saw the Motorizer cd at the mall. I was thinking but Kiss Of Death only came out 5 minutes ago. Now, a year and a half later another album is ready. All bands should be like this. Bands blame things like long tours etc being the reason for these extended periods in between albums but thats bullshit, Motorhead are always touring, they've even found the time to make it down here to NZ twice in the last 5 years. Motorhead is an example to all bands as far as having a work ethic goes. So many bands think 20 shows in the US and Canada and 15 in Europe constitutes a world tour and then they take a year off before starting work on the next album, not Motorhead. These guys are legends. Can't wait for the new album.
Check this out. This is awesome.
[J.D. DIAMOND] Tuesday, March 30, 2010 2:05:09 PM
Motorhead finished recording the band's "20th" studio album!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No title has been revealed as of yet but Lemmy assures it will be "classic Motorhead" with no lame suprises. This is what Motorhead is all about. 19 studio albums and only one of them is an under-par LP with 1993 March Or Die but every other Motorhead album is Lemmy and Co. churning out classic Motorhead. They are the band you can trust that gives you a quality album year after year on a consistant basis unlike the poor song writting skills of a band such as "Iron Maiden". Wait untill this new Motorhead album is unleashed and I'll gaurantee it will hold more votes as being a better album than the next boring Star Trek Maiden studio album.
DOWN THE IRONS. Edited at: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 2:06:35 PM
[Head banger] Sunday, March 28, 2010 7:57:41 PM
probably some cable restriction or something [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ron h from Sunday, March 28, 2010 4:16:30 PM)
ron h wrote:
You too???????? I thought our friends up there in the Great White North pretty much got everything we get...hmmmmm...
Head banger wrote:
same for me. its not just you
Becks wrote:
'Sorry, we're unable to offer this video to users in your region' - ah the joys of living on the other side of the world LOL! Thanks anyway Ron!
I've seen the old version, not the updated one that was shown recently. There are links online that I have seen but it keeps telling me I can't watch it in my area, which SUCKS! LOL!
ron h wrote:
Becks...Did you ever get the chance to see the show of Behind the Music: Judas Priest??
Becks wrote:
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[hellrider 31038] Sunday, March 28, 2010 5:49:03 PM
CAN YOU FEEL IT RUSHING FURIOUS THROU COOOOMMMMMAAAAANNNNNDDDDDEEEERRRRRRRR [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:20:56 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Pain..........................................Pain.............................................killer.........................................killerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr argh we are in for a heavy album I can feel it Hellriderrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hellrider 31038 wrote:
IM GONNA RIP YOUR FACE OFF WITH SOME MIGHTY PAAAAAAAAAINKILLLLLLLLER
AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WHAT A TOTAL INTENSE RUSH OF POWER
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:46:41 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Fuck yeah Hellrider its the "Demonizer"!!!!!!! Boy this song whips some serious ass!!!!
hellrider 31038 wrote:
HELL YEAH J.D DIAMOND THE COOOMMMMMAAAANNNNDDDDEEERRRRRR
JUDAS PRIEST HEAVY MEEETTT TTTAAALLL
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
HA HA HA!!!!! Yes Becks,me puking at an Iron Maiden concert would be the most exciting part lol!!!
DOWN THE IRONS.
Becks wrote:
LOL now that would be something to see. Probably the most exciting part of a concert consisting of 1990-2006 Iron Maiden, LOL!
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:07:13 PM
[ron h] Sunday, March 28, 2010 4:16:30 PM
You too???????? I thought our friends up there in the Great White North pretty much got everything we get...hmmmmm... [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Head banger from Sunday, March 28, 2010 4:13:39 PM)
Head banger wrote:
same for me. its not just you
Becks wrote:
'Sorry, we're unable to offer this video to users in your region' - ah the joys of living on the other side of the world LOL! Thanks anyway Ron!
I've seen the old version, not the updated one that was shown recently. There are links online that I have seen but it keeps telling me I can't watch it in my area, which SUCKS! LOL!
ron h wrote:
Becks...Did you ever get the chance to see the show of Behind the Music: Judas Priest??
Becks wrote:
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
I've seen the old version, not the updated one that was shown recently. There are links online that I have seen but it keeps telling me I can't watch it in my area, which SUCKS! LOL!
ron h wrote:
Becks...Did you ever get the chance to see the show of Behind the Music: Judas Priest??
Becks wrote:
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[Becks] Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:49:11 PM
Yeah, that Eddie sucks donkey balls doesn't it. Maiden have had shit loads of AWESOME album covers, why not continue in that fashion rather than this Star Trek type Eddie LOL! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:33:02 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Hell yeah Becks I couldn't agree more with you and I too would wait through ice and snow for Judas Priest Motorhead and Saxon but NEVER for Iron Maiden. Iron Maiden is the 2nd most overrated pice of shit with shitallica at #1. And yeah the chances of The Final Frontier turning out "as good as Powerslave" are nill but as always I will hope and give it a chance,but with the title of the album along with those song titles the odds of it being anything good are pretty slim.
I already "HATE" the crappy thing on the cover thats supposed to be "Eddie" it is the "worst album cover I have ever seen for an Iron Maiden album cover". And I HATE the title "The Final Frontier" as it instantly reminds me of "Star Trek". And with those lame song titles if they are the real ones they blow big time...so really the odds of this turning out to be something cool are very slim to none.Lets just face it...this band is "dead" and they have fuckin sucked since 1990 thats 20 years this band has "sucked". Fuck Iron Maiden,they have been "weak" for 20 years while Judas Priest,Motorhead and Saxon are the champions of British Heavy Metal.
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS. oh there isn't enough negative icons for how shitty Iron Maiden really is!!!!
lol Becks!
(Quoting Message by Becks from Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:53:41 PM)
Becks wrote:
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:34:45 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:33:02 PM
Hell yeah Becks I couldn't agree more with you and I too would wait through ice and snow for Judas Priest Motorhead and Saxon but NEVER for Iron Maiden. Iron Maiden is the 2nd most overrated pice of shit with shitallica at #1. And yeah the chances of The Final Frontier turning out "as good as Powerslave" are nill but as always I will hope and give it a chance,but with the title of the album along with those song titles the odds of it being anything good are pretty slim.
I already "HATE" the crappy thing on the cover thats supposed to be "Eddie" it is the "worst album cover I have ever seen for an Iron Maiden album cover". And I HATE the title "The Final Frontier" as it instantly reminds me of "Star Trek". And with those lame song titles if they are the real ones they blow big time...so really the odds of this turning out to be something cool are very slim to none.Lets just face it...this band is "dead" and they have fuckin sucked since 1990 thats 20 years this band has "sucked". Fuck Iron Maiden,they have been "weak" for 20 years while Judas Priest,Motorhead and Saxon are the champions of British Heavy Metal.
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS. oh there isn't enough negative icons for how shitty Iron Maiden really is!!!!
lol Becks!
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:34:45 PM
[Becks] Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:26:21 PM
I would have thought so too, but obviously not. Ah well, don't worry about it, I'll get to watch it at some point! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ron h from Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:25:40 PM)
ron h wrote:
Stupid me!! I thought if you paid for Internet access, you had access to ALL of the Internet!! If I was savy enough, I'd burn you a copy, but I'm not!!
Becks wrote:
Awwww thanks Ron, but yeah, poos to them restricting who can view it. Why not make it available for all Priest heavy metal maniacs around the world!
ron h wrote:
I'm really sorry Becks. I just noticed it earlier today and you were the first person I thought about!! Damn them!! lol
Becks wrote:
'Sorry, we're unable to offer this video to users in your region' - ah the joys of living on the other side of the world LOL! Thanks anyway Ron!
I've seen the old version, not the updated one that was shown recently. There are links online that I have seen but it keeps telling me I can't watch it in my area, which SUCKS! LOL!
ron h wrote:
Becks...Did you ever get the chance to see the show of Behind the Music: Judas Priest??
Becks wrote:
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[ron h] Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:25:40 PM
Stupid me!! I thought if you paid for Internet access, you had access to ALL of the Internet!! If I was savy enough, I'd burn you a copy, but I'm not!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Becks from Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:23:19 PM)
Becks wrote:
Awwww thanks Ron, but yeah, poos to them restricting who can view it. Why not make it available for all Priest heavy metal maniacs around the world!
ron h wrote:
I'm really sorry Becks. I just noticed it earlier today and you were the first person I thought about!! Damn them!! lol
Becks wrote:
'Sorry, we're unable to offer this video to users in your region' - ah the joys of living on the other side of the world LOL! Thanks anyway Ron!
I've seen the old version, not the updated one that was shown recently. There are links online that I have seen but it keeps telling me I can't watch it in my area, which SUCKS! LOL!
ron h wrote:
Becks...Did you ever get the chance to see the show of Behind the Music: Judas Priest??
Becks wrote:
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[Becks] Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:23:19 PM
Awwww thanks Ron, but yeah, poos to them restricting who can view it. Why not make it available for all Priest heavy metal maniacs around the world! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ron h from Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:20:52 PM)
ron h wrote:
I'm really sorry Becks. I just noticed it earlier today and you were the first person I thought about!! Damn them!! lol
Becks wrote:
'Sorry, we're unable to offer this video to users in your region' - ah the joys of living on the other side of the world LOL! Thanks anyway Ron!
I've seen the old version, not the updated one that was shown recently. There are links online that I have seen but it keeps telling me I can't watch it in my area, which SUCKS! LOL!
ron h wrote:
Becks...Did you ever get the chance to see the show of Behind the Music: Judas Priest??
Becks wrote:
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:20:56 PM
Pain..........................................Pain.............................................killer.........................................killerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr argh we are in for a heavy album I can feel it Hellriderrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by hellrider 31038 from Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:00:10 PM)
hellrider 31038 wrote:
IM GONNA RIP YOUR FACE OFF WITH SOME MIGHTY PAAAAAAAAAINKILLLLLLLLER
AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WHAT A TOTAL INTENSE RUSH OF POWER
(Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:46:41 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Fuck yeah Hellrider its the "Demonizer"!!!!!!! Boy this song whips some serious ass!!!!
hellrider 31038 wrote:
HELL YEAH J.D DIAMOND THE COOOMMMMMAAAANNNNDDDDEEERRRRRR
JUDAS PRIEST HEAVY MEEETTT TTTAAALLL
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
HA HA HA!!!!! Yes Becks,me puking at an Iron Maiden concert would be the most exciting part lol!!!
DOWN THE IRONS.
Becks wrote:
LOL now that would be something to see. Probably the most exciting part of a concert consisting of 1990-2006 Iron Maiden, LOL!
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:07:13 PM
[ron h] Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:20:52 PM
I'm really sorry Becks. I just noticed it earlier today and you were the first person I thought about!! Damn them!! lol [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Becks from Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:14:51 PM)
Becks wrote:
'Sorry, we're unable to offer this video to users in your region' - ah the joys of living on the other side of the world LOL! Thanks anyway Ron!
I've seen the old version, not the updated one that was shown recently. There are links online that I have seen but it keeps telling me I can't watch it in my area, which SUCKS! LOL!
ron h wrote:
Becks...Did you ever get the chance to see the show of Behind the Music: Judas Priest??
Becks wrote:
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[Becks] Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:14:51 PM
'Sorry, we're unable to offer this video to users in your region' - ah the joys of living on the other side of the world LOL! Thanks anyway Ron! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ron h from Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:12:25 PM)
I've seen the old version, not the updated one that was shown recently. There are links online that I have seen but it keeps telling me I can't watch it in my area, which SUCKS! LOL!
ron h wrote:
Becks...Did you ever get the chance to see the show of Behind the Music: Judas Priest??
Becks wrote:
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
I've seen the old version, not the updated one that was shown recently. There are links online that I have seen but it keeps telling me I can't watch it in my area, which SUCKS! LOL!
ron h wrote:
Becks...Did you ever get the chance to see the show of Behind the Music: Judas Priest??
Becks wrote:
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[ron h] Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:10:14 PM
Well, I wouldn't sleep right if I didn't try to give you yet another link you prolly can't use...brb!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Becks from Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:05:54 PM)
Becks wrote:
I've seen the old version, not the updated one that was shown recently. There are links online that I have seen but it keeps telling me I can't watch it in my area, which SUCKS! LOL!
ron h wrote:
Becks...Did you ever get the chance to see the show of Behind the Music: Judas Priest??
Becks wrote:
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[Becks] Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:05:54 PM
I've seen the old version, not the updated one that was shown recently. There are links online that I have seen but it keeps telling me I can't watch it in my area, which SUCKS! LOL! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ron h from Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:59:15 PM)
ron h wrote:
Becks...Did you ever get the chance to see the show of Behind the Music: Judas Priest??
Becks wrote:
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[hellrider 31038] Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:00:10 PM
IM GONNA RIP YOUR FACE OFF WITH SOME MIGHTY PAAAAAAAAAINKILLLLLLLLER
AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WHAT A TOTAL INTENSE RUSH OF POWER
Fuck yeah Hellrider its the "Demonizer"!!!!!!! Boy this song whips some serious ass!!!!
hellrider 31038 wrote:
HELL YEAH J.D DIAMOND THE COOOMMMMMAAAANNNNDDDDEEERRRRRR
JUDAS PRIEST HEAVY MEEETTT TTTAAALLL
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
HA HA HA!!!!! Yes Becks,me puking at an Iron Maiden concert would be the most exciting part lol!!!
DOWN THE IRONS.
Becks wrote:
LOL now that would be something to see. Probably the most exciting part of a concert consisting of 1990-2006 Iron Maiden, LOL!
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 3:07:13 PM
[ron h] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:59:15 PM
Becks...Did you ever get the chance to see the show of Behind the Music: Judas Priest?? [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Becks from Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:53:41 PM)
Becks wrote:
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[Becks] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:53:41 PM
It's unfortunate that Iron Maiden haven't continued the momentum they had in the 80s. They had some fantastic albums during that time, but everything has become patchy, for lack of a better term, in recent years. If this Final Frontier album turns out as good as say Powerslave, then awesome, but what are the chances really?
Granted, Priest have had their ups and downs musically too, but on recent years they have knocked the shit out of Maiden with their releases.
Now Motorhead, does any band really get any more heavy metal than Motorhead? Lemmy is fuckin awesome LOL! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:50:34 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
DOWN THE IRONS
Becks wrote:
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[guidogodoy] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:52:54 PM
Damn, that "CRRRRAAAAKCK" at the beginning gets me every time. DEMONIZAAAAHHHH!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:46:41 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Fuck yeah Hellrider its the "Demonizer"!!!!!!! Boy this song whips some serious ass!!!!
hellrider 31038 wrote:
HELL YEAH J.D DIAMOND THE COOOMMMMMAAAANNNNDDDDEEERRRRRR
JUDAS PRIEST HEAVY MEEETTT TTTAAALLL
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
HA HA HA!!!!! Yes Becks,me puking at an Iron Maiden concert would be the most exciting part lol!!!
DOWN THE IRONS.
Becks wrote:
LOL now that would be something to see. Probably the most exciting part of a concert consisting of 1990-2006 Iron Maiden, LOL!
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:50:34 PM
I strongly agree Becks,and this is not to toy with Brian either,this is the sad truth about the boring poor song writting skills of the washed up shit band "Iron maiden". "Sad" from a once great band back in the 1980's.
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:46:41 PM
Fuck yeah Hellrider its the "Demonizer"!!!!!!! Boy this song whips some serious ass!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by hellrider 31038 from Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:42:52 PM)
hellrider 31038 wrote:
HELL YEAH J.D DIAMOND THE COOOMMMMMAAAANNNNDDDDEEERRRRRR
JUDAS PRIEST HEAVY MEEETTT TTTAAALLL
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
HA HA HA!!!!! Yes Becks,me puking at an Iron Maiden concert would be the most exciting part lol!!!
DOWN THE IRONS.
Becks wrote:
LOL now that would be something to see. Probably the most exciting part of a concert consisting of 1990-2006 Iron Maiden, LOL!
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[Becks] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:42:57 PM
I would gladly wait for hours for the mighty Priest! Through any weather, any circumstances, I'd be there.
Motorhead and Saxon would be worth waiting for too.
Don't know if I could say the same thing for Maiden - very likely not. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:39:53 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
guidogodoy wrote:
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[hellrider 31038] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:42:52 PM
HELL YEAH J.D DIAMOND THE COOOMMMMMAAAANNNNDDDDEEERRRRRR
JUDAS PRIEST HEAVY MEEETTT TTTAAALLL [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:35:43 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
HA HA HA!!!!! Yes Becks,me puking at an Iron Maiden concert would be the most exciting part lol!!!
DOWN THE IRONS.
Becks wrote:
LOL now that would be something to see. Probably the most exciting part of a concert consisting of 1990-2006 Iron Maiden, LOL!
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:42:39 PM
R.A.M.O.N.E.S. Ramones!!!!!!!!!!
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:39:53 PM
I agree Guido I would of waited trough ice and snow for hours to see Judas Priest,Motorhead or Saxon but never for the overrated boring egomania driven Iron Maiden. And fake Brian "did win"....he won the stupidity trophy as he is the biggest idiot fanboy this site has ever seen ha!! Your right Guido..."what a fuckin joke".
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up).
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:35:43 PM
HA HA HA!!!!! Yes Becks,me puking at an Iron Maiden concert would be the most exciting part lol!!!
LOL now that would be something to see. Probably the most exciting part of a concert consisting of 1990-2006 Iron Maiden, LOL!
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[Becks] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:33:12 PM
LOL now that would be something to see. Probably the most exciting part of a concert consisting of 1990-2006 Iron Maiden, LOL! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:11:10 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[guidogodoy] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:29:35 PM
As for myself, I was in the "Down the Irons" camp back in the Fear of the Dark tour. Free tix and I got onstage with them. The song? Clairvoyant or something just as dull. I remember when the roadie asked if we knew the song so as to show up at the backstage door. "Groan," I think was my reply! LOL!!! FFS, give me a GOOD song!
Like I have posted before, my buddy and I went to the signing at midnight the night of the concert. Guys were an hour+ late and it was cold so we just went home. Think I'd EVER do that with Priest?! Not in a million years. Hell, I'd have even braved the cold a good while longer for Motorhead.
Fake Brian thinks he "won." HAAA! What a friggin' joke. Personally, I am just too bored with his lack of dialog to bother. I'll wait for that loser to start up the White Lion vs. thread. LOL!!! In the meantime, anyone want to make me an offer on some late Maiden CDs? Only played once (disclaimer: seller is not responsible should your ears start to bleed or should your brain suddenly dry up). [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:17:24 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
DOWN THE IRONS FOREVER.
jimmyjames wrote:
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:17:24 PM
LOL! Well my point is that they would be "cringeworthy" played live...I still give A Matter Of Life And Death credit as a "great album" for a washed up poor song writting band like Iron maiden but to hear it live HELL NO. lol!
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
All over the person in front.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[jimmyjames] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:11:10 PM
That would be so funny.
"THIS NEXT SONG IS CALLED THE REINCARNATION OF BENJAMIN BREEG" music starts.....
"oh my god!!!! ......I'm gonna puke!........BLAAAAAAAARGGGHHHHHH
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
"DOWN THE IRONS"
jimmyjames wrote:
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:07:06 PM
Killers!!!! Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:07:37 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, March 28, 2010 2:00:30 PM
But I couldn't ever make a list not even for fun because any songs from Iron Maiden that were made from 1990 -2006 would make me puke to hear them played live,I just can't come up with anything for real man,they are "that bad" and I can only listen to some of these songs on my stereo in small doses maybe once every 2 years if that and only a track or 2,not the whole album ect..
My girlfriend has Brave New World and A Matter Of life And Death but they never get played...we don't own any other album from 1990-2006 except those 2 and they hardly even get played at home like I said maybe once every 2 years or more and when we play them we only play one song or so...thats why I just can't list a setlist YUK! lol!
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[jimmyjames] Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:46 PM
I didn't ask you to rate the albums JD, I just figured if you compiled a setlist you would naturally pick the songs you liked best or didn't like the least. It's not and easy thing to do and was supposed to be a bit of fun. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:27:07 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:49:18 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:27:07 PM
To Jimmy James: Listing a setlist from Iron maiden tracks that are from albums 1990 - 2006 is a lost cause because I would "HATE" to hear these fuckin songs live even if I like some of them,its not to hard to understand because as I've said.....while some of those tracks are good and even if I think AMOLAD album is great they are not "good enough to play live" YUK. Thats why I can't come up with a set list from those years...they simply "are not good enough" for a live show because Iron Maiden "FUCKING SUCKS".
And by the way....I did and have rated those albums from 1990-2006 go back in Brian's pathetic Iron Maiden thread from the other day March 25th when we both listed each Iron Maiden album...you will find that I've rated each album ...do you have a short term memory loss jimmy or have you been smoking my pot again? lol!!!
Now Motorhead? This isn't aimed at you jimmy but heres my opinion of Motorhead vs. Iron Maiden..... Motorhead's song writting fuckin crushes Iron Maiden's balls no question. I could "easily" make up a set list of kick ass Motorhead songs in a track list from 1990 -2008 no problem although it would be so easy there would be so many tracks that would not fit in a 2 1/2 hour set list but I could easily make one....Motorhead has so many top notch excellent songs that tower over Iron maiden its not funny,really...its not even close.
And another thing thats funny is the title of this thread says "who is HARDER"? LOL Iron Maiden is so mellow these days and soooooo progressive that there is NO WAY they can be "harder" than the panzer division Motorhead assult at thier volume.
Listen to Runaround Man uptop....does Iron maiden have any songs that can top this in heaviness the last 20 years? Fuck no they don't. Motorhead has balls and like Brian_Evans, Iron Maiden does not...end of story.
DOWN THE FUCKIN' IRONS.
Edited at: Sunday, March 28, 2010 1:51:31 PM
[Becks] Wednesday, March 17, 2010 9:57:03 PM
AWESOME. Motorhead + Classic British Comedy = [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by jimmyjames from Wednesday, March 17, 2010 9:28:55 PM)
jimmyjames wrote:
This was the first time I ever saw Motorhead. Guesting on one of the great TV shows of all time, The Young Ones.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I want one of these Lemmy figures!!!! lol!! Motorhead over Maiden everyday!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:15:36 AM
[jimmyjames] Wednesday, March 17, 2010 9:28:55 PM
This was the first time I ever saw Motorhead. Guesting on one of the great TV shows of all time, The Young Ones.
I want one of these Lemmy figures!!!! lol!! Motorhead over Maiden everyday!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:15:36 AM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:14:58 AM
I want one of these Lemmy figures!!!! lol!! Motorhead over Maiden everyday!!!!
Edited at: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 2:15:36 AM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:51:53 AM
HAHA but Brian,I already admit that Iron Maiden are a great band from 1980 to 1988. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Brian_Evans from Tuesday, March 16, 2010 9:41:47 PM)
Brian_Evans wrote:
You're going to look pretty silly man with all your Iron Madien bashing when the new Iron Maiden album (The Final Frontier) comes out and it blows everyone away. You still have time to save face and admit what a great metal band they are. Its up to you. roflol!! at you Saxon fanboy.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Hey Becks...I suppose Bruce Dickinson will be in a Star Trek uniform when he comes out on stage right? lol!!!
(Quoting Message by Becks from Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:37:25 PM)
Becks wrote:
LOL yep those 3 titles are pretty rubbish JD. The others I can take or leave.
This is unofficial but I'm beginning to think this is the real song titles of the new Iron Maiden album. If this is true (wich keep in mind it may not be) then there are 3 song titles that are utterly ridiculous.."Where No Man Has Gone Before" Longing For Heaven(yuk) and Murky Space Race...those 3 title would be lame if they are actually the song titles.The other 5 titles I can handle. "Where No Man Has Gone Before"?? Is this a joke?
Edited at: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:47:49 PM
[Brian_Evans] Tuesday, March 16, 2010 9:41:47 PM
You're going to look pretty silly man with all your Iron Madien bashing when the new Iron Maiden album (The Final Frontier) comes out and it blows everyone away. You still have time to save face and admit what a great metal band they are. Its up to you. roflol!! at you Saxon fanboy. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:39:58 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Hey Becks...I suppose Bruce Dickinson will be in a Star Trek uniform when he comes out on stage right? lol!!!
(Quoting Message by Becks from Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:37:25 PM)
Becks wrote:
LOL yep those 3 titles are pretty rubbish JD. The others I can take or leave.
This is unofficial but I'm beginning to think this is the real song titles of the new Iron Maiden album. If this is true (wich keep in mind it may not be) then there are 3 song titles that are utterly ridiculous.."Where No Man Has Gone Before" Longing For Heaven(yuk) and Murky Space Race...those 3 title would be lame if they are actually the song titles.The other 5 titles I can handle. "Where No Man Has Gone Before"?? Is this a joke?
Edited at: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:47:49 PM
[Becks] Tuesday, March 16, 2010 7:02:52 PM
LOL!!!! Yeah, maybe eh! Sounds more and more like a Star Trek concept album if those song titles are correct! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:39:58 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
LOL! Hey Becks...I suppose Bruce Dickinson will be in a Star Trek uniform when he comes out on stage right? lol!!!
(Quoting Message by Becks from Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:37:25 PM)
Becks wrote:
LOL yep those 3 titles are pretty rubbish JD. The others I can take or leave.
This is unofficial but I'm beginning to think this is the real song titles of the new Iron Maiden album. If this is true (wich keep in mind it may not be) then there are 3 song titles that are utterly ridiculous.."Where No Man Has Gone Before" Longing For Heaven(yuk) and Murky Space Race...those 3 title would be lame if they are actually the song titles.The other 5 titles I can handle. "Where No Man Has Gone Before"?? Is this a joke?
Edited at: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:47:49 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:39:58 PM
LOL! Hey Becks...I suppose Bruce Dickinson will be in a Star Trek uniform when he comes out on stage right? lol!!!
This is unofficial but I'm beginning to think this is the real song titles of the new Iron Maiden album. If this is true (wich keep in mind it may not be) then there are 3 song titles that are utterly ridiculous.."Where No Man Has Gone Before" Longing For Heaven(yuk) and Murky Space Race...those 3 title would be lame if they are actually the song titles.The other 5 titles I can handle. "Where No Man Has Gone Before"?? Is this a joke?
Edited at: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:47:49 PM
[Becks] Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:37:25 PM
LOL yep those 3 titles are pretty rubbish JD. The others I can take or leave. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:31:07 PM)
This is unofficial but I'm beginning to think this is the real song titles of the new Iron Maiden album. If this is true (wich keep in mind it may not be) then there are 3 song titles that are utterly ridiculous.."Where No Man Has Gone Before" Longing For Heaven(yuk) and Murky Space Race...those 3 title would be lame if they are actually the song titles.The other 5 titles I can handle. "Where No Man Has Gone Before"?? Is this a joke?
This is unofficial but I'm beginning to think this is the real song titles of the new Iron Maiden album. If this is true (wich keep in mind it may not be) then there are 3 song titles that are utterly ridiculous.
"Where No Man Has Gone Before" Longing For Heaven(yuk ) and Murky Space Race...those 3 title would be lame if they are actually the song titles.The other 5 titles I can handle.
"Where No Man Has Gone Before" from the album The Final Frontier.....they should have the Star Trek theme song that goes into the first track right? ?? Is this a joke?
Edited at: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:37:30 PM
[Soylentgreen4u] Friday, March 12, 2010 7:42:23 AM
WE'RE OUT OF COKES,CLEAN OUT OF SMOKES,
IT'S NOT FUNNY 'COS WE RUN OUT OF JOKES,
GOING TO THE MOVIES,BABES IN THE WOOD,
GONNA GET A TELESCOPE,LOOK REAL GOOD.....
[J.D. DIAMOND] Saturday, January 23, 2010 11:43:23 PM
We all have opinions and I'm no different,so I have to say that "only the old Iron Maiden" first 5 studio albums are great up to Powerslave,the rest are overrated BIG TIME. Metallica is the biggest lamest overrated band in the world and Maiden is # 2 next to shittalica.I like old Iron Maiden and some of thier newer stuff too but its ridiculously overrated in my opinion.
Thier albums after Powerslave are really not all that great,some of them are ok but never as good as the first 5 albums,not even close.But when they play live,everyone wants to go because of "Number Of The Beast man"....thats the only reason people go see Iron Maiden is to hear thier "old shit"not thier new shit.
Motorhead might be harder, Maiden are fuckin better though.
Edited at: Saturday, January 23, 2010 11:50:28 PM
[Frosty] Saturday, January 23, 2010 11:12:38 PM
Motorhead might be harder, Maiden are fuckin better though.
[iamnostradamus88] Sunday, November 29, 2009 8:59:53 PM
Motorhead. I just love em'
[guidogodoy] Sunday, November 29, 2009 6:14:52 PM
I've seen that too. The "Beast" didn't have hair as long nor voice as loud as Lemmy. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Sunday, November 29, 2009 5:54:05 PM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
I saw Disney on Ice. That was pretty loud and heavy...HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
I have seen Motorhead some five times in small and large venues and I can confirm. They are as loud and heavy as they get.
Edited at: Sunday, November 29, 2009 6:16:12 PM
[Deep Freeze] Sunday, November 29, 2009 6:11:58 PM
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, November 29, 2009 6:09:06 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Thats what we need is when Lemmy retires from Motorhead to join Disney On Ice tour....can you imagine the volume??? LOL! Those kids would be crying to turn it down!!! lol!!
Deep Freeze wrote:
I saw Disney on Ice. That was pretty loud and heavy...HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
I have seen Motorhead some five times in small and large venues and I can confirm. They are as loud and heavy as they get.
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, November 29, 2009 6:09:06 PM
Thats what we need is when Lemmy retires from Motorhead to join Disney On Ice tour....can you imagine the volume??? LOL! Those kids would be crying to turn it down!!! lol!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Sunday, November 29, 2009 5:54:05 PM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
I saw Disney on Ice. That was pretty loud and heavy...HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
guidogodoy wrote:
I have seen Motorhead some five times in small and large venues and I can confirm. They are as loud and heavy as they get.
[Deep Freeze] Sunday, November 29, 2009 5:54:05 PM
I saw Disney on Ice. That was pretty loud and heavy...HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Sunday, November 29, 2009 5:49:48 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
I have seen Motorhead some five times in small and large venues and I can confirm. They are as loud and heavy as they get.
[guidogodoy] Sunday, November 29, 2009 5:49:48 PM
I have seen Motorhead some five times in small and large venues and I can confirm. They are as loud and heavy as they get.
[Deep Freeze] Sunday, November 29, 2009 5:12:51 PM
I have not had the pleasure of seeing (hearing) Motorhead live so I can only tell you what I know. I am sure that audio technology has come a LOOOOOONG way in 40 years so I would guess that you are right. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, November 29, 2009 5:01:58 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Yeah I know Freeze I know it sounds clich'e but dude.....YES!! Motorhead ARE the loudest band on EARTH!!! LOL! OMFG they were LOUD man,and belive me I've heard loud shows before but,fucking AAAA!!!! God damn they were LOUD and CLEAR TOO!!! The decible level crushes whatever level the Who were playing at in 68' because I've read articles about this very thing and man,Lemmy is NUTS!! LOFL!!
Deep Freeze wrote:
Hmmm..."loudest", huh? I seem to recall the same thing being said about The Who back in '68.......Seriously!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I like Seventh Son too,but I don't like Somewhere In Time except for a couple of songs(2) like you,and yeah they got soft after Powerslave. And MUSICGIRL....this thread wasn't who we like better,it is "who is harder"?? And I've seen Iron Maiden live 3 times and just saw Motorhead live in October for the first time,and I can definately tell you that "MOTORHEAD" is "harder"!!!!!! This was the LOUDEST fucking show I have EVER seen!!!! Any louder and my ears would literately be bleeding,so to say Maiden is harder is unvalid,so I'm not saying that you should like Motorhead better rather than admitting that Motorhead are "harder"!!! lol! These guys are so loud its unreal!!!!! lol!
guidogodoy wrote:
Now THAT is a statement I'll back 100%. Powerslave is a gem, I CHERISH Seventh Son, I still like some songs off of Somewhere in Time but they dropped the ball afterwards if you ask me....and I was on stage with them during Fear of the Dark. They had us on during the Clairvoyant? How do you spice up a dud like that by pretending people rushed the stage?!
At least it wasn't "Take your Daughter to the Slaughter!" LOL.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Iron Maiden "used" to be heavier than Motorhead up till Powerslave....and then they got so progressive that nowadays...Motorhead is light years heavier than maiden.
And as I said before...Motorhead is LIGHT YEARS more "consistant with releasing quality albums....Maiden is nowhere close to that at all.
Edited at: Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:29:41 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, November 29, 2009 5:01:58 PM
Yeah I know Freeze I know it sounds clich'e but dude.....YES!! Motorhead ARE the loudest band on EARTH!!! LOL! OMFG they were LOUD man,and belive me I've heard loud shows before but,fucking AAAA!!!! God damn they were LOUD and CLEAR TOO!!! The decible level crushes whatever level the Who were playing at in 68' because I've read articles about this very thing and man,Lemmy is NUTS!! LOFL!! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by Deep Freeze from Sunday, November 29, 2009 2:39:24 PM)
Deep Freeze wrote:
Hmmm..."loudest", huh? I seem to recall the same thing being said about The Who back in '68.......Seriously!
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I like Seventh Son too,but I don't like Somewhere In Time except for a couple of songs(2) like you,and yeah they got soft after Powerslave. And MUSICGIRL....this thread wasn't who we like better,it is "who is harder"?? And I've seen Iron Maiden live 3 times and just saw Motorhead live in October for the first time,and I can definately tell you that "MOTORHEAD" is "harder"!!!!!! This was the LOUDEST fucking show I have EVER seen!!!! Any louder and my ears would literately be bleeding,so to say Maiden is harder is unvalid,so I'm not saying that you should like Motorhead better rather than admitting that Motorhead are "harder"!!! lol! These guys are so loud its unreal!!!!! lol!
guidogodoy wrote:
Now THAT is a statement I'll back 100%. Powerslave is a gem, I CHERISH Seventh Son, I still like some songs off of Somewhere in Time but they dropped the ball afterwards if you ask me....and I was on stage with them during Fear of the Dark. They had us on during the Clairvoyant? How do you spice up a dud like that by pretending people rushed the stage?!
At least it wasn't "Take your Daughter to the Slaughter!" LOL.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Iron Maiden "used" to be heavier than Motorhead up till Powerslave....and then they got so progressive that nowadays...Motorhead is light years heavier than maiden.
And as I said before...Motorhead is LIGHT YEARS more "consistant with releasing quality albums....Maiden is nowhere close to that at all.
Edited at: Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:29:41 PM
[jackylone] Sunday, November 29, 2009 4:40:53 PM
Loudest band, definitely Motorhead! i paid a buck for ear plugs at Blossom Music Center, with pavillion seats! Best band, no question, JUDAS PRIEST!!! Maiden also a great band!
[HOT ROCKIN' METAL GODDESS] Sunday, November 29, 2009 2:47:32 PM
ABSOLUTELY Motorhead is THE LOUDEST show I've ever seen. I normally don't put in earplugs, but DAMN! I had to save my ears for Heaven and Hell and the MIGHTY PRIEST! Those boys know how to kick ass on stage [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, November 29, 2009 2:26:20 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I like Seventh Son too,but I don't like Somewhere In Time except for a couple of songs(2) like you,and yeah they got soft after Powerslave. And MUSICGIRL....this thread wasn't who we like better,it is "who is harder"?? And I've seen Iron Maiden live 3 times and just saw Motorhead live in October for the first time,and I can definately tell you that "MOTORHEAD" is "harder"!!!!!! This was the LOUDEST fucking show I have EVER seen!!!! Any louder and my ears would literately be bleeding,so to say Maiden is harder is unvalid,so I'm not saying that you should like Motorhead better rather than admitting that Motorhead are "harder"!!! lol! These guys are so loud its unreal!!!!! lol!
guidogodoy wrote:
Now THAT is a statement I'll back 100%. Powerslave is a gem, I CHERISH Seventh Son, I still like some songs off of Somewhere in Time but they dropped the ball afterwards if you ask me....and I was on stage with them during Fear of the Dark. They had us on during the Clairvoyant? How do you spice up a dud like that by pretending people rushed the stage?!
At least it wasn't "Take your Daughter to the Slaughter!" LOL.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Iron Maiden "used" to be heavier than Motorhead up till Powerslave....and then they got so progressive that nowadays...Motorhead is light years heavier than maiden.
And as I said before...Motorhead is LIGHT YEARS more "consistant with releasing quality albums....Maiden is nowhere close to that at all.
Edited at: Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:29:41 PM
[Deep Freeze] Sunday, November 29, 2009 2:39:24 PM
Hmmm..."loudest", huh? I seem to recall the same thing being said about The Who back in '68.......Seriously! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Sunday, November 29, 2009 2:26:20 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
I like Seventh Son too,but I don't like Somewhere In Time except for a couple of songs(2) like you,and yeah they got soft after Powerslave. And MUSICGIRL....this thread wasn't who we like better,it is "who is harder"?? And I've seen Iron Maiden live 3 times and just saw Motorhead live in October for the first time,and I can definately tell you that "MOTORHEAD" is "harder"!!!!!! This was the LOUDEST fucking show I have EVER seen!!!! Any louder and my ears would literately be bleeding,so to say Maiden is harder is unvalid,so I'm not saying that you should like Motorhead better rather than admitting that Motorhead are "harder"!!! lol! These guys are so loud its unreal!!!!! lol!
guidogodoy wrote:
Now THAT is a statement I'll back 100%. Powerslave is a gem, I CHERISH Seventh Son, I still like some songs off of Somewhere in Time but they dropped the ball afterwards if you ask me....and I was on stage with them during Fear of the Dark. They had us on during the Clairvoyant? How do you spice up a dud like that by pretending people rushed the stage?!
At least it wasn't "Take your Daughter to the Slaughter!" LOL.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Iron Maiden "used" to be heavier than Motorhead up till Powerslave....and then they got so progressive that nowadays...Motorhead is light years heavier than maiden.
And as I said before...Motorhead is LIGHT YEARS more "consistant with releasing quality albums....Maiden is nowhere close to that at all.
Edited at: Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:29:41 PM
[J.D. DIAMOND] Sunday, November 29, 2009 2:26:20 PM
I like Seventh Son too,but I don't like Somewhere In Time except for a couple of songs(2) like you,and yeah they got soft after Powerslave. And MUSICGIRL....this thread wasn't who we like better,it is "who is harder"?? And I've seen Iron Maiden live 3 times and just saw Motorhead live in October for the first time,and I can definately tell you that "MOTORHEAD" is "harder"!!!!!! This was the LOUDEST fucking show I have EVER seen!!!! Any louder and my ears would literately be bleeding,so to say Maiden is harder is unvalid,so I'm not saying that you should like Motorhead better rather than admitting that Motorhead are "harder"!!! lol! These guys are so loud its unreal!!!!! lol! [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by guidogodoy from Sunday, November 29, 2009 1:42:24 PM)
guidogodoy wrote:
Now THAT is a statement I'll back 100%. Powerslave is a gem, I CHERISH Seventh Son, I still like some songs off of Somewhere in Time but they dropped the ball afterwards if you ask me....and I was on stage with them during Fear of the Dark. They had us on during the Clairvoyant? How do you spice up a dud like that by pretending people rushed the stage?!
At least it wasn't "Take your Daughter to the Slaughter!" LOL.
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Iron Maiden "used" to be heavier than Motorhead up till Powerslave....and then they got so progressive that nowadays...Motorhead is light years heavier than maiden.
And as I said before...Motorhead is LIGHT YEARS more "consistant with releasing quality albums....Maiden is nowhere close to that at all.
Edited at: Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:29:41 PM
[guidogodoy] Sunday, November 29, 2009 1:42:24 PM
Now THAT is a statement I'll back 100%. Powerslave is a gem, I CHERISH Seventh Son, I still like some songs off of Somewhere in Time but they dropped the ball afterwards if you ask me....and I was on stage with them during Fear of the Dark. They had us on during the Clairvoyant? How do you spice up a dud like that by pretending people rushed the stage?!
At least it wasn't "Take your Daughter to the Slaughter!" LOL. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:29:13 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
Iron Maiden "used" to be heavier than Motorhead up till Powerslave....and then they got so progressive that nowadays...Motorhead is light years heavier than maiden.
And as I said before...Motorhead is LIGHT YEARS more "consistant with releasing quality albums....Maiden is nowhere close to that at all.
You may be right J.D. Diamond, Motorhead is harder but I still enjoy Maiden best because I know more of their music. But I would not be against seeing Motorhead live. I quess that would help make an informed decision.
[musicgirl] Sunday, November 29, 2009 12:38:24 PM
You may be right J.D. Diamond, Motorhead is harder but I still enjoy Maiden best because I know more of their music. But I would not be against seeing Motorhead live. I quess that would help make an informed decision.
[J.D. DIAMOND] Saturday, November 28, 2009 2:53:15 PM
HAHAHA you are very hilarious hehehe as if Iron Maiden could possibly be "harder" than Motorhead(lomfl!!) Obviously you have NEVER SEEN MOTORHEAD LIVE or you wouldn't be posting such nonsense!! HAHA!! There is no band in the world that is louder than Motorhead and Maiden don't come close to being "harder" than Motorhead. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by musicgirl from Saturday, November 28, 2009 11:45:06 AM)
musicgirl wrote:
Maiden of course, who could deny EDDIE
[musicgirl] Saturday, November 28, 2009 11:45:06 AM
Maiden of course, who could deny EDDIE
[hellrider 31038] Saturday, November 28, 2009 11:38:44 AM
the heeeeeellllllrrrrrriiiiiiddddddeeeeerrrrrrrrrrr definatly seconds that. [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by ammedredd from Saturday, November 28, 2009 6:58:00 AM)
ammedredd wrote:
MOTORHEAD by far! MOTORHEAD Maiden. Edited at: Saturday, November 28, 2009 7:02:45 AM
[ammedredd] Saturday, November 28, 2009 6:58:00 AM
MOTORHEAD by far! MOTORHEAD Maiden. Edited at: Saturday, November 28, 2009 7:02:45 AM
[hellrider 31038] Monday, October 05, 2009 10:58:42 PM
OH HELL YEAH J.D DIAMOND THE COOOOMMMMMMMMAAAAAAANNNNNNNDDDDDDEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRR [Show/Hide Quoted Message](Quoting Message by J.D. DIAMOND from Monday, October 05, 2009 5:36:01 PM)
J.D. DIAMOND wrote:
As the member who created this thread ("livethemetal") said: who's harder? Maiden or Motorhead? Its gotta be Motorhead.... After the panzer division assult rolled through Seattle on Friday night thats called "MOTORHEAD"....I can back his statement up
1,000%!!!!!!!!! For god's sake if anybody ever wonders about this question....Motorhead are definately "harder" and louder than Maiden.
[J.D. DIAMOND] Monday, October 05, 2009 5:36:01 PM
As the member who created this thread ("livethemetal") said: who's harder? Maiden or Motorhead? Its gotta be Motorhead.... After the panzer division assult rolled through Seattle on Friday night thats called "MOTORHEAD"....I can back his statement up
1,000%!!!!!!!!! For god's sake if anybody ever wonders about this question....Motorhead are definately "harder" and louder than Maiden.
[.] Friday, September 04, 2009 2:12:42 AM
Not a choice question for me. I can enjoy both. But (joking) the day Lemmy Kilmeister dies, they will tour his dead body around the world. There will be massive funeral processions by biker gangs and grieving fandom everywhere. Tattoos with RIP Lemmy in Goth lettering by the thousands, every band ever known to mankind will pay tribute...it will be a massive event for decades to come.
[wino] Friday, September 04, 2009 12:22:28 AM
HARD CHOICE SO WONT MAKE ONE !
[Izzystone] Wednesday, September 02, 2009 12:52:35 PM
I have to say Iron Maiden. They have a lot more variations and are tighter and more "metallish".
I also love Motörhead, but Maiden is so much more music for me!
oh there isn't enough negative icons for how shitty Iron Maiden really is!!!! 
